2.6.4 · D3 · Maths › Matrices & Determinants — Introduction › Scalar multiplication
Yeh page scalar multiplication ke liye "sab kuch ek jagah" wali page hai. Parent note ne rule build kiya tha: k A matlab A ki har entry ko number k se multiply karo. Yahan hum us rule ko har tarah ke input ke against drill karenge — positive, negative, zero, fractions, zero matrix, ek word problem, aur ek exam trap.
Shuru karne se pehle, ek word jo hum zyada use karte hain: scalar bas ek akela ordinary number hota hai (jaise 3 , − 2 , ya 2 1 ) — dekho vectors and scalars . Yeh ek matrix nahi hai. Neeche har example mein ek matrix (numbers ki grid, introduction to matrices ) ko ek aisa scalar se multiply kiya gaya hai.
Har scalar-multiplication problem jo tumhe di ja sakti hai, in boxes mein se kisi ek mein aati hai. Hum sabhi ko cover karenge.
Cell
Scenario
Isme tricky kya hai
Example
A
Positive whole scalar, k > 1
Baseline — har entry ko stretch karo
Ex 1
B
Fractional scalar, 0 < k < 1
Shrink; fractions ka dhyan raho
Ex 2
C
Negative scalar, k < 0
Har sign flip ho jaata hai
Ex 3
D
The scalar k = 0
Zero matrix O mein collapse ho jaata hai
Ex 4
E
The scalar k = 1
Kuch nahi badlta (identity check)
Ex 4
F
Combined: k 1 A + k 2 B
Dono baar scale karo, phir add karo
Ex 5
G
Geometric meaning (columns as arrows)
Scaling = picture ko stretch/reflect karna
Ex 6
H
Real-world word problem (units!)
Words → matrix → scale mein translate karo
Ex 7
I
Exam twist: solve for k or X
Rule ko ulta chalao
Ex 8
Chalo cell by cell chalte hain.
Worked example Example 1 —
k = 4 se stretch (Cell A)
Maano A = [ 2 5 − 3 0 ] . 4 A nikalo.
Forecast: aage padhne se pehle — har number 4 guna bada ho jaayega, aur grid 2 × 2 hi rahegi. Charo answers guess karo.
Scalar ko grid ke aage likho.
4 A = 4 [ 2 5 − 3 0 ]
Yeh step kyun? Definition kehti hai k A har entry ko k se multiply karta hai; aise likhne se yaad rehta hai ki 4 ko har box tak pahunchna hai.
Entry-by-entry multiply karo.
= [ 4 ⋅ 2 4 ⋅ 5 4 ⋅ ( − 3 ) 4 ⋅ 0 ] = [ 8 20 − 12 0 ]
Yeh step kyun? Koi bhi entry doosri se interact nahi karti (jaise matrix multiplication mein hoti hai); har ek ko apne aap scale kiya jaata hai.
Verify: 4 ⋅ 0 = 0 (zero entry zero hi rehti hai — accha sanity anchor hai). Dimensions: A 2 × 2 hai, toh 4 A bhi 2 × 2 hai. ✓
Worked example Example 2 —
k = 3 1 se shrink (Cell B)
Maano E = [ 6 12 − 9 15 ] . 3 1 E nikalo.
Forecast: 3 1 se multiply karna 3 se divide karne jaisa hi hai. Yahan saari entries 3 ke multiples hain, toh guess karo: kya yeh whole numbers mein aayenge?
3 1 ko har box mein distribute karo.
3 1 E = [ 3 6 3 12 3 − 9 3 15 ]
Yeh step kyun? Fraction bilkul legal scalar hai; entry-wise rule ko koi fark nahi padta ki k whole hai ya nahi.
Har fraction simplify karo.
= [ 2 4 − 3 5 ]
Yeh step kyun? Har division ek akele number par independent arithmetic hai.
Verify: 3 se multiply karke wapas check karo: 3 [ 2 4 − 3 5 ] = [ 6 12 − 9 15 ] = E . Original wapas milna confirm karta hai ki 3 1 aur 3 ek doosre ko undo karte hain. ✓
Worked example Example 3 —
k = − 1 se reflect (Cell C)
Maano B = [ 1 4 2 5 3 6 ] . − B compute karo.
Forecast: − B shorthand hai ( − 1 ) B ka. Har entry ke sign ka kya hoga? Scroll karne se pehle guess karo.
− B ko scalar multiple ke roop mein rewrite karo.
− B = ( − 1 ) [ 1 4 2 5 3 6 ]
Yeh step kyun? Matrix ke aage bare minus sign ka matlab hi − 1 se scalar multiplication hai — scalar ko naam dena rule ko honest rakhta hai.
Har entry ko − 1 se multiply karo.
= [ − 1 − 4 − 2 − 5 − 3 − 6 ]
Yeh step kyun? Kisi number ko − 1 se multiply karne par uska sign flip ho jaata hai; yeh saaton chhezon ke saath independently karo.
Verify: B + ( − B ) zero matrix honi chahiye (dekho matrix addition ): [ 1 + ( − 1 ) ⋯ ] = [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] . ✓ Ek number aur uska negative 0 deta hai, box by box.
Worked example Example 4 —
0 ⋅ A aur 1 ⋅ A (Cells D & E)
Example 1 se A = [ 2 5 − 3 0 ] use karke, 0 ⋅ A aur 1 ⋅ A compute karo.
Forecast: inme se ek matrix ko erase kar dega; doosra use bilkul waise hi chhod dega. Kaunsa kaunsa hai?
Cell D: har entry ko 0 se multiply karo.
0 ⋅ A = [ 0 ⋅ 2 0 ⋅ 5 0 ⋅ ( − 3 ) 0 ⋅ 0 ] = [ 0 0 0 0 ] = O
Yeh step kyun? Zero times koi bhi number zero hota hai, toh har box collapse ho jaata hai — result hai zero matrix O (A ke same size mein, sabhi entries 0 ).
Cell E: har entry ko 1 se multiply karo.
1 ⋅ A = [ 1 ⋅ 2 1 ⋅ 5 1 ⋅ ( − 3 ) 1 ⋅ 0 ] = [ 2 5 − 3 0 ] = A
Yeh step kyun? One times koi bhi number wahi number hota hai, toh kuch nahi hilta — 1 identity scalar hai.
Verify: dono cases mein size unchanged rehti hai (2 × 2 in, 2 × 2 out) — scaling kabhi resize nahi karti. Aur 0 ⋅ A = O parent note ki Property 4 se match karta hai. ✓
0 ⋅ A sirf number 0 hai"
Nahi — yeh zero matrix hai, zeros ki poori grid jiska A jaisa hi shape hai. Ek akela number aur 2 × 2 zeros ka block alag-alag cheezein hain.
Worked example Example 5 —
3 C + 2 D compute karo (Cell F)
Maano C = [ 1 0 0 1 ] aur D = [ 2 4 3 5 ] . 3 C + 2 D nikalo.
Forecast: do scalings hoti hain pehle , phir koi addition hoti hai. Pehle 3 C guess karo (diagonal par sirf 3 hona chahiye).
C ko 3 se scale karo.
3 C = [ 3 0 0 3 ]
Yeh step kyun? Rule D ko haath lagane se pehle akele C par laagu hota hai; order of operations scaling ko pehle rakhta hai.
D ko 2 se scale karo.
2 D = [ 4 8 6 10 ]
Yeh step kyun? Same rule, alag scalar aur matrix.
Dono scaled matrices ko entry-by-entry add karo.
3 C + 2 D = [ 3 + 4 0 + 8 0 + 6 3 + 10 ] = [ 7 8 6 13 ]
Yeh step kyun? Matrices ka addition bhi entry-wise hota hai, aur dono 2 × 2 hain toh allow hai.
Verify: top-left hai 3 ( 1 ) + 2 ( 2 ) = 7 ✓ aur bottom-right hai 3 ( 1 ) + 2 ( 5 ) = 13 ✓. Scaling aur adding ka yeh mixing exactly linear-combination pattern hai.
Yahan 2 × 2 matrix ke do columns ko arrows ki tarah padha jaata hai jo origin se shuru hote hain. Matrix ko scale karna dono arrows ko scale karta hai. Yeh linear transformations ka seed hai.
Worked example Example 6 — arrows ko stretch aur reflect karo (Cell G)
Maano M = [ 2 1 − 1 1 ] . Iske columns arrows hain u = [ 2 1 ] aur v = [ − 1 1 ] . 2 M aur ( − 1 ) M compute karo aur pictures describe karo.
Forecast: doubling se har arrow ki length double honi chahiye, same direction mein. − 1 se multiply karne par har arrow ulti direction mein point karna chahiye. Figure se pehle picture banao.
2 se scale karo.
2 M = [ 4 2 − 2 2 ]
Yeh step kyun? Har column ke coordinates double ho jaate hain, toh har arrow ki length double ho jaati hai jabki uska angle fixed rehta hai.
Blue original arrow u aur longer yellow 2 u ko dekho jo seedha uski direction ke upar layered hai — sirf length badi hai.
− 1 se scale karo.
( − 1 ) M = [ − 2 − 1 1 − 1 ]
Yeh step kyun? − 1 se multiply karne par har coordinate negate ho jaata hai, jo arrow ko origin ke through exact opposite side ki taraf point karta hai.
Red arrow − u blue u ki same length hai lekin 18 0 ∘ doosri taraf jaata hai — origin ke through ek reflection hai.
Verify: u ki length hai 2 2 + 1 2 = 5 ; 2 u ki length = 4 2 + 2 2 = 20 = 2 5 — exactly double ✓. − u ki length = ( − 2 ) 2 + ( − 1 ) 2 = 5 — unchanged ✓.
Worked example Example 7 — price list double karna (Cell H)
Ek shop weekly sales ko matrix S mein store karti hai jahan rows do branches hain aur columns hain (units sold, price per unit ₹ mein):
S = [ 30 50 20 15 ]
Ek festival prices double kar deta hai (abhi ke liye units same rehte hain). Lekin prices sirf column 2 mein hain. Koi naive hokar 2 S likhta hai. Kya galat ho jaata hai, aur sahi fix kya hai?
Forecast: kya poori matrix scale hoti hai, ya sirf ek column? Socho ki "prices double karna" actually kya touch karta hai.
Pehle dekho ki 2 S kya dega .
2 S = [ 60 100 40 30 ]
Yeh step kyun? Scalar multiplication all-or-nothing hai — yeh sirf ek column touch nahi kar sakta. Toh 2 S galti se units sold bhi double kar deta hai.
Sahi model: sirf column 2 price hai. Ek akele column ko scale karna S ki scalar multiplication nahi hai; us column ko alag se scale karo.
S new = [ 30 50 40 30 ]
Yeh step kyun? Jo physical quantity double ho rahi hai (price, ₹ mein) woh sirf column 2 mein hai, toh sirf wahi entries badlti hain.
Verify: units column unchanged: 30 , 50 — pehle jaisa ✓. Price column double: 20 → 40 , 15 → 30 ✓. Lesson: scalar multiplication sab kuch scale karta hai; ise tabhi use karo jab poori grid same tarah ki quantity ho jo same factor se scale ho rahi ho.
k A reach karna jab sirf part of the data scale hoti hai
Ek akela scalar k har entry ko equally hit karta hai. Agar tumhara real-world factor sirf kuch rows/columns par apply hota hai (ya alag-alag parts par alag factors), toh poori matrix ki scalar multiplication galat tool hai.
Worked example Example 8 — unknown ke liye solve karo (Cell I)
Scalar k aur phir matrix X nikalo jaise ki
k [ 3 − 6 ] = [ 12 − 24 ] , 2 X = [ 8 6 − 4 0 ] .
Forecast: part 1 mein tumhe before aur after pata hai, toh k ek ratio hai. Part 2 mein ek doubling undo karni hai — kaunsa scalar 2 ko undo karta hai?
k nikalo: har entry same k se multiply hui hai, toh koi ek entry compare karo.
k ⋅ 3 = 12 ⟹ k = 3 12 = 4
Yeh step kyun? Kyunki k ek hi number hai jo har jagah apply hota hai, ek equation use determine kar deti hai.
Doosri entry ke saath consistency check karo.
4 ⋅ ( − 6 ) = − 24 ✓
Yeh step kyun? Agar dono entries alag k deti toh koi single scalar kaam nahi karta — check iske against guard karta hai.
X ke liye solve karo: dono sides ko 2 1 se multiply karo (2 ko undo karne wala scalar).
X = 2 1 [ 8 6 − 4 0 ] = [ 4 3 − 2 0 ]
Yeh step kyun? 2 1 ⋅ 2 = 1 , aur 1 ⋅ X = X (Cell E), toh 2 1 se scale karna X ko isolate kar deta hai.
Verify: wapas plug karo — 2 [ 4 3 − 2 0 ] = [ 8 6 − 4 0 ] ✓ aur 4 [ 3 − 6 ] = [ 12 − 24 ] ✓.
Recall Kaun se scenarios matrix ko collapse ya preserve karte hain?
0 ⋅ A zero matrix deta hai; 1 ⋅ A A ko unchanged chhod deta hai.
0 ⋅ A deta hai ::: zero matrix O (same shape, sab zeros)
1 ⋅ A deta hai ::: A khud, unchanged
Recall Negative scalar ka matrix ke columns par geometric effect kya hota hai?
Har column-arrow ko origin ke through reflect karo (same length, opposite direction).
Effect of multiplying by − 1 ::: har column-arrow 18 0 ∘ flip ho jaata hai, length unchanged
Mnemonic "Ek scalar, poori grid, koi exception nahi"
Agar factor har entry par equally apply nahi hota, toh yeh matrix ki scalar multiplication nahi hai.