Question bank — Integers — operations, number line, absolute value
Prerequisite links to lean on while you reason: 2.5.01-Natural-numbers-and-place-value, 2.1.05-Inequalities, and later 2.5.03-Rational-numbers.
The three figures below are your reference pictures — the reveals point back to them, so glance at them first.
Number line as movement (addition/subtraction traps):
The sign-pattern grid (multiplication/division traps):
Absolute value = distance from zero (magnitude traps):
True or false — justify
Recall Every subtraction of two natural numbers gives another natural number.
True or false, and why? ::: False — , which is not natural. Integers exist precisely to close this gap so every subtraction has an answer.
Recall Zero is a positive integer.
True or false, and why? ::: False — zero is neither positive nor negative. It is the origin of the number line and belongs to , but it has no direction, so it is excluded from both and the negatives.
Recall The rule "two negatives make a positive" applies to
. True or false, and why? ::: False — that rule is only for multiplication/division. Here : both are movements left (figure s01), which pile up, not cancel.
Recall
can ever be negative. True or false, and why? ::: False — is a distance from zero (figure s03), and distance is never negative. By definition for every integer .
Recall If
then . True or false, and why? ::: False — equal distances allow opposite directions, e.g. but . Absolute value forgets sign, so it cannot recover it.
Recall For all integers,
. True or false, and why? ::: False — subtraction is not commutative. but ; only addition and multiplication are commutative.
Recall
is always a negative number. True or false, and why? ::: False — means "the additive inverse of ", not "a negative number". If , then , which is positive. The minus sign flips whatever it meets.
Recall On the number line,
means is the smaller magnitude. True or false, and why? ::: False — means is to the left of (figure s01), regardless of magnitude. For example even though ; the more negative number is smaller.
Recall
for all integers. True or false, and why? ::: False in general — this is only an inequality (). Equality needs to share a sign (or one to be zero). E.g. but ; see 2.1.05-Inequalities for the triangle inequality.
Spot the error
Recall A student writes:
"because two negatives make a positive". Find and fix the error. ::: They applied a multiplication rule to addition. Two leftward moves accumulate (figure s01): . Sign in addition comes from direction of movement, not a blanket rule.
Recall A student writes:
. Find and fix the error. ::: They kept the second minus as "more negative". Subtracting a negative adds its opposite: — a move right, not left.
Recall A student writes:
. Find and fix the error. ::: Absolute value does not distribute over subtraction. Evaluate inside first: , then . A magnitude can never come out negative.
Recall A student concludes
"since anything with zero is zero". Find and fix the error. ::: Division asks "what makes ?" No such exists, so is undefined — it is not zero, and confusing it with (which is zero) is the trap.
Recall A student writes:
. Find and fix the error. ::: Without brackets the exponent binds tighter than the sign, so . Only . The bracket decides whether the minus is squared.
Recall A student writes: since
, then too. Find and fix the error. ::: The sign-cancelling behaviour is exclusive to multiplication (figure s02). In addition both moves go left: .
Why questions
Recall Why is
forced, not just a convention? Explain. ::: Because . Since , the other term must equal to keep the sum at . The distributive law leaves no other choice (see the diagonal of figure s02).
Recall Why do we
define as instead of treating subtraction separately? Explain. ::: So one addition rule handles everything. "Take away " is exactly "move left by " (figure s01), i.e. add ; this also explains why flips subtracting-a-negative into adding-a-positive.
Recall Why is absolute value defined with two cases (
if , else )? Explain. ::: Because distance must come out non-negative (figure s03). A positive input is already its own distance; a negative input needs its sign flipped, and (the inverse) does exactly that, e.g. .
Recall Why does the triangle inequality use
and not ? Explain. ::: When point in opposite directions, part of one move cancels the other, so the final distance is less than the total distance walked . Equality only when nothing cancels.
Recall Why can't the natural numbers alone model temperature or debt?
Explain. ::: They have no way to go below a starting point — no negatives and no zero-as-origin. Integers add a left-hand side to the number line so "5 below zero" or "owe $5" have honest addresses.
Edge cases
Recall What is
when exactly (equal magnitudes, opposite signs)? Answer. ::: Exactly . The rightward and leftward moves are the same length (figure s01), so they cancel and land you back on the origin — the tie case of the opposite-signs rule.
Recall Is
positive, negative, or does it have a sign at all in ? Answer. ::: has no sign; it is neither positive nor negative, and because it sits at the origin, zero steps away.
Recall What happens to the "keep the sign of the larger magnitude" rule when the two magnitudes are equal?
Answer. ::: There is no "larger", so the rule's tie-branch applies: the result is . A tie lands you exactly on zero, which carries no sign.
Recall Is
defined? Is defined? Answer. ::: is fine (the with is ). But is undefined — no satisfies . Only the divisor being zero breaks things.
Recall Is
defined? (The subtler zero case.) Answer. ::: No — it is indeterminate. Here holds for every , so there is no single answer; too many candidates is just as fatal as none, so stays undefined.
Recall For which integers does
hold, and for which does ? Answer. ::: whenever (including , the shared boundary); whenever . Zero satisfies both since .
Recall Does
ever fail? Answer. ::: Never — and are mirror images across the origin (figure s03), always the same distance from it. This holds even at , where both sides are .