2.2.3 · D1Functions

Foundations — Function notation — f(x), g(x)

1,651 words8 min readBack to topic

Before you can trust the parent note on Function notation — f(x), g(x), you need every piece of its alphabet built from nothing. This page collects each symbol and idea it uses or silently assumes, and defines them one at a time, each resting on the one before.


1. A number and a number line

This is the very first picture we need, because a function machine eats a number (a position on the line) and produces another number (another position).

Figure — Function notation — f(x), g(x)

Why the topic needs it: when we later write or , the and the are just marked spots on this line — the raw material the machine transforms.


2. The variable — a box waiting for a number

Why the topic needs it: function notation separates the rule from the specific number. The variable is exactly that separation — the "any-number" stand-in.


3. An expression — a recipe made of numbers and a box

Why the topic needs it: the parent note's rules like are expressions. The expression is the "recipe card" hanging inside the machine.


4. Substitution — putting a value into the box

This is the single most important action in the whole topic, so it gets its own picture.

Figure — Function notation — f(x), g(x)

Why the topic needs it: every evaluation (, , ) in the parent note is a substitution. Master this and the rest is bookkeeping.


5. The equals sign, two jobs

Why the topic needs it: confusing these two is the root of the parent's "Common Mistake 2" (writing ). Keeping the jobs separate keeps rule and number separate.


6. The function machine — name, rule, input, output

Now we can assemble the star of the show.

Figure — Function notation — f(x), g(x)

Why the topic needs it: this machine picture is the mental model behind literally every callout in the parent note.


7. The notation itself, decoded

Why the topic needs it: this is the topic. Everything else is what you can do once you can read .


8. Different names, same input — vs

Why the topic needs it: comparing and combining functions (the parent's whole "power of notation" section) is impossible without distinct names.


9. Feeding a machine another machine's output — composition

Figure — Function notation — f(x), g(x)

Why the topic needs it: composition is the reason notation exists — it lets us stack machines unambiguously.


The prerequisite map

Number line

Variable x as a box

Expression as a recipe

Substitution put a value in

Equals sign two jobs

Function machine name rule output

Notation f of x

Many names f vs g

Composition inside out

Read it downward: each idea only makes sense once the ones feeding into it are solid.


  • Functions: Domain and Range — which inputs the box is allowed to hold.
  • Composite functions — the full machinery of .
  • Inverse functions — the machine that undoes .
  • Graphing functions — drawing as a picture on the line's 2D cousin.
  • Piecewise functions — machines with more than one rule.

Equipment checklist

Give an out-loud answer, then reveal.

Where does a number "live" in our picture?
As a marked position on a straight number line.
What is the variable ?
A named empty box that will hold any number you choose later.
What is an expression like ?
A recipe of operations on the box — instructions, not yet a number.
What does "substitute" mean?
Erase everywhere and write the chosen number in its place, then compute.
The two jobs of the sign?
Defining the machine () vs. reporting a result ().
What are the four parts of a function machine?
Name, input, rule, output.
How do you read ?
" of " — the output when machine is fed the input .
Does mean ?
No — the bracket means "feed in," not multiply.
Why use different letters and ?
They name different machines, so the same input can give different outputs.
In , which runs first?
runs first (innermost bracket); its output is then fed to .
Is always true?
No — order matters; composition is generally not commutative.