The word "square" is not an accident — it is a picture.
Look at the figure: a square whose side is x has area x×x=x2. That is why we call it "squaring", and it is the seed of the whole method — later we literally rearrange rectangles to complete a square.
Recall Why is squaring the hard part?
Because the same box x shows up squared and on its own in x2+…x. We cannot just read the answer off — squaring hides it. The entire method exists to tame that squared term.
::: Because the unknown appears both squared and linear, so it can't be read off directly.
a=0?
The term ax2 is the only place x2 appears. If a=0 that square vanishes and there is no square left to complete — the equation collapses to a straight-line (linear) one.
::: Because a=0 removes the x2 term entirely, so it is no longer quadratic.
The red dots in the figure are the crossings — the roots. The three curves show the only three things that can happen: a parabola can cross the ground twice (cyan), touch it once (amber), or miss it entirely (white). That three-way split is exactly what the discriminant (Section 8) will predict.
Read this identity right-to-left and it becomes a factory: given x2+(linear), what h turns it into a clean square?
The figure shows why: a big square of side (x+h) splits into an x2 block, two identical h⋅x strips (that's the 2hx), and a tiny h2 corner. To "complete the square" we supply exactly that missing corner h2.
See Perfect square trinomials and Completing the square technique for the full drill.
4a2=2∣a∣, not 2a?
Because a square root is never negative, and 4a2=2∣a∣ where ∣a∣ is the absolute value from above. But since the ± out front already supplies both signs, writing 2a instead of 2∣a∣ changes nothing about the pair of answers.
::: The ± absorbs the sign, so 2a and 2∣a∣ give the same two roots.
Compare these three cases directly to the three parabolas in the Section 3 figure. Deep dive: Discriminant and nature of roots. When Δ<0 we escape into Complex numbers and quadratic equations using the symbol i where i2=−1.