Worked examples — Equivalent fractions, simplifying fractions
The scenario matrix
Every simplifying/equivalence task falls into one of these cells. We will hit each one.
| # | Case class | What makes it special | Example we'll do |
|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | Ordinary simplify | Share a common factor | |
| C2 | Big / prime-factor simplify | Numbers too big to guess GCD | |
| C3 | Already lowest terms | GCD is already — nothing to do | |
| C4 | Zero numerator | — a degenerate value | |
| C5 | Zero denominator | — undefined, not a fraction | |
| C6 | Build an equivalent | Grow, don't shrink, to a target denominator | |
| C7 | Negative fraction | A minus sign — which sign, and where? | |
| C8 | Equal-or-not test | Two fractions, no simplifying needed | vs |
| C9 | Word problem | Translate real life into a fraction, then simplify | ribbon lengths |
| C10 | Exam twist | Cancel-across-plus trap; solve for a missing part | and a proportion |
Cells C1–C3 = shrinking. C4–C5 = degenerate inputs. C6 = growing. C7 = signs. C8 = comparison. C9–C10 = real world & traps.
The one tool we'll lean on: prime factorisation

Look at the board above: and each become a tower of prime bricks. The bricks they both have (the pale-yellow highlighted ) are exactly their GCD.
C1 · Ordinary simplify
C2 · Big numbers — prime factorisation earns its keep
C3 · Already in lowest terms
C4 · Zero on top (degenerate but legal)
. Forecast: is this "nothing", or is it undefined?
- Read the meaning. = cut a whole into equal parts and take of them. Why start with meaning? Zero is a legal count of pieces — you're just holding none.
- Value. Taking zero pieces of any whole gives . So . Why? is the number with ; here forces .
- In lowest terms we usually write it simply as (or ).
Verify: anything , and numerator ✓. Cross-check: since ✓ — every equals .
C5 · Zero on the bottom (illegal)
. Forecast: many people write "" or "". Both are wrong. Why?
- Try the definition. would be the number with . Why? That's what a fraction means — the that rebuilds the numerator.
- No such exists. for every , never . Why this kills it: there is no number that works, so the symbol names nothing.
- Conclusion: is undefined. You cannot cut a whole into equal parts.
Verify: for any candidate value, ✓ — the equation is unsolvable, confirming "undefined".
C6 · Build an equivalent fraction (growing)
with denominator . Forecast: what number will sit on top?
- Find the multiplier for the bottom. We need , so . Why the denominator first? The target tells us how many times finer we're cutting each piece — that's .
- Apply the SAME to the top: . Why the top too? Because ; multiplying only the bottom would change the value.
Verify: simplify back — , ✓. Cross-check: , ✓.
C7 · Negative fractions — where does the sign live?
. Forecast: guess the sign and the size of the answer.
- Split off the sign. . Why? A minus on the numerator makes the whole fraction negative — the sign is a property of the value, not of one number. So handle size and sign separately.
- Simplify the size. (since , , shared ). . Why? Same rule as always — the minus doesn't affect which factors are shared.
- Reattach the sign: .
Verify: and — equal ✓. Note : the three forms all name the same negative number.
is negative." No — two minus signs cancel: . A fraction is negative only when top and bottom have different signs.
C8 · Equal or not? (comparison, no simplifying required)
and equal? Forecast: yes or no?
- Cross-multiply. and . Why cross-multiply and not simplify both? It's one clean test: . It never needs a GCD and works even for ugly numbers. Same engine as Ratios and proportion.
- Compare the two products: , so they're equal.
Verify: simplify each — () and (). Same lowest form ✓.
C9 · Word problem — translate, then simplify
long. You cut off . What fraction of the ribbon did you cut, in lowest terms? Forecast: more or less than half?
- Build the fraction. Cut whole . Why this order? "Fraction of the ribbon" means (part) over (whole) — the whole is the denominator.
- Simplify. , ; shared , so . . Why? Lowest terms gives the cleanest description of "how much".
Verify (units + sense): , so ✓ — matches the cut. And , so "more than half" ✓. Connects to Decimals and percentages: .
C10 · Exam twists — the trap and the missing part
. Is this valid? (b) Solve . Forecast (a): does cancelling the 's work? (b): what is ?
Part (a) — the cancel-across-plus trap.
- Test the claim numerically. , but the student claims . Why test first? Numbers settle the argument instantly.
- Compare: but . Not equal — the cancel is illegal. Why it's illegal: you may only cancel a factor that multiplies the whole top and whole bottom. In , the is a term (added), not a factor (multiplied). See the parent note's mistake box.
Part (b) — solve for the missing numerator.
- Find the bottom multiplier: . Why? Same as C6 — the denominators tell us how the pieces were re-cut.
- Apply to the top: .
Verify: (a) ✓ (trap exposed). (b) cross-multiply , ✓.
Recall Quick self-test across the whole matrix
Simplify . ::: (divide by ). What is ? ::: — zero pieces of a whole. What is ? ::: Undefined — nothing satisfies . Write with denominator . ::: (multiply top & bottom by ). Simplify . ::: . Is ? ::: No — ; you can't cancel across a plus. Fraction of a cm ribbon that a cm cut is? ::: .
"Bricks, sign, zero — check all three." Break into prime bricks to cancel, watch the sign, and ask if a zero makes it (top) or undefined (bottom).
Connections
- Prime factorisation — the brick-tower method used in C2, C7, C9.
- Factors, multiples and GCD/HCF — the GCD is the product of shared bricks.
- Ratios and proportion — cross-multiplication (C8, C10b) is the same tool.
- Decimals and percentages — sanity-checks in C9 ().
- Adding and subtracting fractions — building equivalents (C6) is the first step there.
- Number Systems – rational numbers — every case here outputs a rational in lowest terms.