Exercises — Alkenes — preparation (dehydration, dehydrohalogenation, Zaitsev's rule), addition reactions
Level 1 — Recognition
L1.1
Problem. A student wants to turn an alcohol into an alkene. Name the reaction type, and say which two atoms/groups leave and from which carbons.
Recall Solution
Reaction type: dehydration (a β-elimination). The two departing pieces are –OH (from the carbon bearing it, the α-carbon) and –H (from an adjacent carbon, the β-carbon). Removing an H and an OH from neighbouring carbons lets a new C=C π bond snap into place. Net loss = , hence de-hydr-ation. Trace it with curly arrows (Picture A): the β C–H electron pair swings in to become the π bond, while the C–OH₂⁺ electrons leave with water.
L1.2
Problem. For each, state whether it is elimination or addition: (a) decolourising an alkene, (b) alcoholic KOH acting on an alkyl halide, (c) /Ni on an alkene.
Recall Solution
(a) Addition — Br atoms add across the double bond, destroying it (decolourisation is the visible sign). (b) Elimination — H and X leave adjacent carbons, building the double bond. (c) Addition — two H atoms add across C=C (hydrogenation), destroying the double bond. Rule of thumb: making an alkene = elimination; using an alkene = addition.
Level 2 — Application
L2.1
Problem. Predict the major product when 2-bromobutane () reacts with alcoholic KOH. Name it, give the C=C substitution count, and state which geometric isomer of the major product dominates.
Recall Solution
Alcoholic KOH → base → elimination (dehydrohalogenation). The Br sits on C2, so a β-H can come from C1 or C3.
- β-H from C1 → but-1-ene, → 1 alkyl group on the C=C (monosubstituted).
- β-H from C3 → but-2-ene, → 2 alkyl groups on the C=C (disubstituted).
Zaitsev's rule: the more substituted (more stable) alkene is the major product. Major product = but-2-ene, a disubstituted alkene (2 alkyl groups feeding the double bond via hyperconjugation + I).
Geometry (E/Z): but-2-ene has two versions because the C=C cannot rotate (the π bond locks it). If the two groups sit on opposite sides = trans (E)-but-2-ene; on the same side = cis (Z)-but-2-ene. The bulky methyls repel less when opposite, so trans (E)-but-2-ene is the major geometric isomer. See the E/Z figure below.

L2.2
Problem. Add HBr to propene () with no peroxide. Give the major product by name. Draw the mechanism with curly arrows.
Recall Solution
Ionic, electrophilic addition → Markovnikov. The adds where it makes the more stable cation. Follow the curly arrows in the figure below:
- The π electron pair reaches out and grabs (arrow from the double bond to H).
- This leaves a cation on the other carbon.
- on C1 (terminal ) → 2° cation on C2 (stable). Then lends its lone pair to that carbon (arrow from Br⁻ to C2).
- on C2 → 1° cation on C1 (unstable) → minor.
The 2° pathway dominates → ends on the more substituted carbon → 2-bromopropane, .

L2.3
Problem. Same propene + HBr, but with organic peroxide. Product?
Recall Solution
Peroxide switches the mechanism to free-radical (Kharasch effect). Now adds first, and it adds so as to make the more stable carbon radical.
- on C1 → radical on C2 = 2° radical (stable). Then that carbon grabs H.
- Result: Br on C1 (the carbon with more H's) = anti-Markovnikov = 1-bromopropane, .
Note: this reversal happens only for HBr. (In radicals we track single electrons, so half-headed "fish-hook" arrows would replace the full curly arrows of Picture A.)
Level 3 — Analysis
L3.1
Problem. 2-methylbut-2-ene vs but-1-ene — which alkene is more stable, and by what count of stabilising influences? Explain using substitution and connect it to Picture B.
Recall Solution
Count alkyl groups directly attached to the C=C carbons.
- 2-methylbut-2-ene, : the two double-bond carbons carry 3 alkyl groups (two on one C, one on the other) → trisubstituted.
- but-1-ene, : only 1 alkyl group → monosubstituted.
Why substitution helps (Picture B): each alkyl group carries C–H bonds whose electrons can lean into the π system — that overlap is hyperconjugation. More alkyl groups = more of those overlapping bonds + more +I donation (electrons pushed toward the C=C) → lower energy. 2-methylbut-2-ene is more stable (3 vs 1 alkyl substituents).
L3.2
Problem. 2-bromo-2-methylbutane with alcoholic KOH can give two alkenes. Draw both, decide the Zaitsev major, and justify with a substitution count.
Recall Solution
Structure: . Br is on C2, which is bonded to C1 (), C3 () and a methyl branch. β-H's are available from C1 and from C3.
- β-H from C1 → 2-methylbut-1-ene, → C=C carries 2 alkyl groups (disubstituted).
- β-H from C3 → 2-methylbut-2-ene, → C=C carries 3 alkyl groups (trisubstituted).
Zaitsev picks the more substituted → 2-methylbut-2-ene (trisubstituted) is the major product.
Level 4 — Synthesis
L4.1
Problem. Starting from propan-2-ol, design a two-step route to 2-bromopropane. Give reagents and each intermediate.
Recall Solution
Step 1 — dehydration. Propan-2-ol, , with conc. , heat: (Acid protonates OH → water leaves → 2° cation → loses β-H → propene. Trace this three-step E1 flow with curly arrows as in Picture A.) Step 2 — Markovnikov HBr addition (no peroxide): Br lands on the more substituted C (via the 2° cation). Product: 2-bromopropane.
L4.2
Problem. From the same propene, design a route to 1-bromopropane instead. What single change flips the outcome?
Recall Solution
Add HBr in the presence of organic peroxide: The peroxide switches ionic → free-radical, and adds first to give the stable 2° radical, dropping Br on the terminal carbon = anti-Markovnikov = 1-bromopropane. Single change: add peroxide (and it must be HBr, not HCl/HI).
Level 5 — Mastery
L5.1
Problem. 3,3-dimethylbut-1-ene () is treated with HBr (no peroxide). Naively you'd expect Markovnikov 2-bromo-3,3-dimethylbutane. The actual major product is 2-bromo-2,3-dimethylbutane. Explain the mechanism that causes this, and map the atoms before and after the shift.
Recall Solution
adds to C1 (terminal ) giving a 2° cation on C2: . But right next door sits a fully substituted quaternary carbon carrying methyls. A methyl group migrates (1,2-shift) from C3 to C2, converting the 2° cation into a 3° cation on C3 — far more stable (see Carbocations — stability and rearrangement). then attacks the new 3° cation site. Result: rearranged skeleton → 2-bromo-2,3-dimethylbutane. The before/after atom map (which carbon holds the +, where the migrating lands, where Br finally attaches) is drawn in the figure below.

This is carbocation rearrangement: whenever an ionic mechanism generates a cation that can become more stable by a 1,2-shift, it will.
L5.2
Problem. You have but-2-ene and want to run an experiment proving it is unsaturated, then convert it to butane. Give the qualitative test (with observation) and the conversion.
Recall Solution
Test for unsaturation: add reddish-brown bromine water. The alkene's π electrons attack (via a cyclic bromonium ion), so is consumed and the colour decolourises — positive test for a C=C. Conversion to butane: catalytic hydrogenation (H₂, Ni/Pt/Pd), which adds H across the π bond (syn, saturating it): Product: butane (a saturated alkane).
Recall Quick self-quiz
Alcoholic KOH on an alkyl halide does elimination or substitution? ::: Elimination (base) — aqueous would substitute. Markovnikov: H adds to the carbon with more or fewer H's? ::: More H's (leaving the stable cation on the more substituted carbon). Peroxide effect reverses HX for which halide only? ::: HBr only. Zaitsev counts alkyl groups on what? ::: Only the two double-bond carbons. A 2° cation next to a bulky quaternary carbon may do what? ::: A 1,2-methyl shift to become a 3° cation. Why does but-2-ene have cis and trans forms? ::: The C=C cannot rotate, so groups are locked on the same (cis/Z) or opposite (trans/E) sides — trans is more stable.