4.2.2 · D4Hydrocarbons

Exercises — Conformations of ethane, butane — Newman projections

2,199 words10 min readBack to topic

Constants used everywhere on this page:


Level 1 — Recognition

Problem 1.1 (L1)

Look at the Newman projection below. Is it staggered or eclipsed? How can you tell at a glance?

Figure — Conformations of ethane, butane — Newman projections
Recall Solution 1.1

Staggered. The clue is the dihedral angle — the angle between a front bond (line from the centre dot) and the nearest back bond (line from the circle's edge).

  • If the back bonds would hide directly behind the front bonds (three lines only, they overlap) → eclipsed.
  • Here the back bonds sit in the gaps at , giving a clean six-pointed star → staggered.

What we did: measured the front-to-back bond gap. Why: the gap is the single number that names the conformer.

Problem 1.2 (L1)

In a butane Newman projection down the C2–C3 bond, name the conformer when the two groups sit at .

Recall Solution 1.2

means the two methyls point in exactly opposite directions — the maximum possible separation. This is the anti (trans) conformer, the global energy minimum. All bonds are staggered and the bulky groups are as far apart as geometry allows, so neither torsional nor steric strain bites.


Level 2 — Application

Problem 2.1 (L2)

Use the ethane torsional energy formula to find at .

Recall Solution 2.1

What the formula says: tracks the three-fold symmetry — three H's mean the pattern repeats every . Plug in , so : Interpretation: is exactly halfway between staggered (, ) and eclipsed (, ). The molecule is climbing the barrier, sitting at half-height. Makes physical sense ✓.

Problem 2.2 (L2)

Ethane has three eclipsing H–H pairs at . If the total barrier is , what is the strain contributed by one H–H eclipsing pair?

Recall Solution 2.2

The three pairs are identical by symmetry, so they share the barrier equally: Why divide: symmetry guarantees each pair costs the same, so total 3 × (one pair). This ~4.2 kJ/mol number is the building block chemists quote per eclipsing interaction.


Level 3 — Analysis

Problem 3.1 (L3)

For butane, gauche sits above anti. Compute the raw Boltzmann ratio for a single gauche well.

Recall Solution 3.1

Which tool and why: the Boltzmann distribution answers "given an energy gap, what fraction of molecules climb into the higher state?" That is exactly our question. Keep units consistent — convert kJ to J: . Meaning: for every 100 anti molecules, about 22 sit in each gauche well.

Problem 3.2 (L3)

There are two gauche wells ( and ). Using Problem 3.1, estimate the percentage of molecules that are anti.

Recall Solution 3.2

Why count two wells: and are distinct arrangements of equal energy — a degeneracy that doubles gauche's share (an entropy effect). Total gauche relative population . Treat anti's population as . Then the fractions are: So room-temperature butane is roughly 70% anti, 30% gauche ✓ — the classic textbook mixture.


Level 4 — Synthesis

Problem 4.1 (L4)

Sketch (mentally) the full butane energy curve down C2–C3 and rank all four labelled conformers by energy, giving the approximate value of each: fully eclipsed (syn, ), gauche (), eclipsed (), anti ().

Figure — Conformations of ethane, butane — Newman projections
Recall Solution 4.1

Read the curve left to right. Each feature comes from adding two kinds of strain — torsional (from eclipsing) + steric (from bulky clashes). See Steric strain and van der Waals repulsion.

Conformer Strains (kJ/mol)
Fully eclipsed (syn) torsional + steric ~19 (highest)
Gauche mild steric only ~3.8
Eclipsed torsional + steric ~16
Anti none significant 0 (lowest)

Stability order: . Key insight: the two eclipsed peaks are unequal. At methyl sits over methyl (fat over fat) → worst. At methyl sits over H (fat over thin) → milder. Ethane would show three equal peaks; butane's methyl breaks that symmetry.

Problem 4.2 (L4)

The syn barrier (from anti at up to syn) is about . Room-temperature thermal energy per collision is roughly . Argue quantitatively whether butane can be "bottled" as separate anti and gauche compounds.

Recall Solution 4.1

Compute how many "thermal units" the barrier is worth: The barrier is under 8 . Barriers below roughly are crossed billions of times per second at room temperature (the Boltzmann tail always supplies enough molecules with ). Conclusion: anti and gauche interconvert far too fast to isolate — they are conformers, not isomers you can put in separate flasks. This is the boundary drawn in Stereochemistry — isomerism overview.


Level 5 — Mastery

Problem 5.1 (L5)

A student measures butane and finds it is 65% anti at some temperature . Assuming and two gauche wells, solve for . Is it hotter or colder than ? Explain the direction physically.

Recall Solution 5.1

Set up the equation. With two gauche wells of ratio each: Solve for : Invert the Boltzmann relation. Take : Physical direction: — it is hotter. Heating supplies more thermal energy, so more molecules climb into the higher-energy gauche wells; the anti fraction falls from 70% toward 65%. Raising always pushes populations toward the higher states (the exponential rises toward 1 as ).

Problem 5.2 (L5 — synthesis with symmetry)

Ethane's barrier follows . Suppose a molecule had a two-fold rotation symmetry about its central bond instead of three-fold. Write the analogous energy formula, state how many maxima per full turn it predicts, and name a real molecule from the parent note whose methyl–methyl clash pattern is closer to two-fold than three-fold.

Recall Solution 5.2

Build the formula from symmetry. The exponent inside cosine counts maxima per : three-fold → (3 peaks). Two-fold → replace 3 with 2: Check: maxima where , i.e. . That is 2 maxima per full turn. Real-molecule link. Butane's dominant clash is between the two methyl groups (one on each carbon). As you rotate, the big methyl–methyl eclipse recurs strongly with a period tied to those two groups meeting — a roughly two-fold pattern in the steric term, superimposed on the three-fold torsional background. That is precisely why butane's curve has two unequal big features (syn at , plus the milder eclipse at ) rather than three identical ones like ethane. Why this matters: the cosine's integer coefficient is literally a symmetry counter — read the molecule's rotational symmetry and you can predict the number of energy peaks before doing any chemistry.


Recall One-line self-test (click to check you internalised the page)

Why is butane's peak higher than its peak? ::: At methyl eclipses methyl (both bulky → torsional + large steric); at methyl eclipses only H (torsional + small steric). What single number in tells you the peak count? ::: — the rotational symmetry order equals the number of maxima per full turn. Heating butane shifts population which way? ::: Toward the higher-energy gauche conformers, so anti fraction drops.


Connections

  • Boltzmann distribution — the engine behind every population problem (L3, L5).
  • Steric strain and van der Waals repulsion — why gauche and syn cost energy.
  • Hyperconjugation — the electronic reason staggered ethane wins.
  • Stereochemistry — isomerism overview — where the "conformer ≠ isomer" line is drawn (L4).
  • Alkanes — structure and sp3 hybridisation — the tetrahedral geometry these projections view.
  • Cyclohexane conformations chair and boat — the same strain logic on a ring.