Exercises — Types of organic reactions — addition, substitution, elimination, rearrangement
Before we start, the decision tree you will use on every question:

Level 1 — Recognition
Goal: name the reaction shape by the atom budget alone.
Recall Solution L1.1
Type: Addition (hydrogenation).
- Two molecules () became one ().
- The bond opened; two atoms added across it.
- Degree of unsaturation dropped from .
- Nothing left the molecule. → Addition confirmed by the classifier's box 2.
Recall Solution L1.2
Type: Substitution (nucleophilic).
- left and (a nucleophile) took its exact place.
- Atoms in () = atoms out (); no bond born or destroyed.
- This is box 4 of the classifier — a group swap.
Recall Solution L1.3
Type: Elimination (dehydration).
- and a - left as from adjacent carbons.
- A new bond was born — unsaturation rose .
- One molecule split into two. Box 3.
Level 2 — Application
Goal: apply Markovnikov / Saytzeff by choosing the more stable intermediate.
Recall Solution L2.1
Major product: (2-bromopropane).
- Step 1 (slow): the electrons grab . can land on C1 (terminal) or C2.
- Landing on C1 puts the charge on C2, giving a secondary carbocation.
- Landing on C2 would leave a primary cation — much less stable.
- By Carbocation stability (, via Hyperconjugation and Inductive effect), the mechanism takes the path.
- Step 2 (fast): adds to . So sits on the more substituted carbon → Markovnikov.
Recall Solution L2.2
Major product: but-2-ene, .
- Two -hydrogens are available: on C1 (the terminal ... actually the far ) giving but-1-ene, or on C3 giving but-2-ene.
- But-2-ene is disubstituted ( alkyl groups on the double bond); but-1-ene is monosubstituted.
- More alkyl groups → more hyperconjugation → lower-energy alkene → Saytzeff major.
Level 3 — Analysis
Goal: pick the operating mechanism from substrate + conditions.

Recall Solution L3.1
Mechanism: . Rate .
- Substrate is methyl (least hindered) — no stable carbocation possible, so is ruled out.
- is a strong nucleophile; acetone is polar aprotic (doesn't cage the nucleophile).
- Both favour the one-step backside attack → inversion (see left panel of figure). See SN1 vs SN2 mechanisms.
Recall Solution L3.2
Mechanism: . Rate ; outcome = racemisation.
- Tertiary carbon → too crowded for backside attack ( blocked), but forms a very stable carbocation.
- Polar protic solvent (water/ethanol) stabilises that cation.
- The planar cation is attacked from both faces equally → racemic mixture (right panel of figure).
Recall Solution L3.3
Elimination, E2.
- A bulky base is too fat to reach the carbon for substitution but can still pluck an exposed -.
- Strong base + one concerted step → E2, rate .
- See E1 vs E2 mechanisms. Bulky base also steers toward the Hofmann (less substituted) alkene, but the classification is firmly E2.
Level 4 — Synthesis
Goal: combine steps — spot rearrangement hidden inside a substitution/addition.
Recall Solution L4.1
Product: 2-methylbutan-2-ol, . Types: Substitution () with Rearrangement (1,2-methyl shift).
- Step 1: leaves the , giving a primary neopentyl cation — very unstable.
- Step 2 (rearrangement): a methyl group migrates with its bonding pair (1,2-methyl shift) to convert the cation into a cation . Formula unchanged ().
- Step 3: water attacks the carbon, then loses → the tertiary alcohol.
- The rearranged product dominates because energy drops going .
Recall Solution L4.2
Major product: 2-chloro-2-methylbutane, . Types: Addition + Rearrangement.
- adds to C1 (terminal) → a cation on C2: .
- A 1,2-hydride shift from the adjacent turns the cation into a cation on C3.
- then adds to the carbon → the "unexpected" Markovnikov-plus-rearranged product.
- Lesson: whenever a more stable cation is one shift away, expect rearrangement even in simple additions.
Level 5 — Mastery
Goal: full multi-classification and quantitative reasoning.
Recall Solution L5.1
Type: Aromatic Electrophilic Substitution (Ar).
- The electrophile attacks the ring cloud, forming a resonance-stabilised arenium ion (Wheland intermediate) — momentarily an addition-like species.
- But instead of a nucleophile adding (which would destroy aromaticity), a ring is lost, restoring the aromatic sextet.
- Net: one out, one in, ring system preserved → substitution. See Aromatic Electrophilic Substitution.
- Addition is avoided because keeping aromaticity ( kJ/mol resonance energy) is worth far more than the two extra bonds addition would buy.
Recall Solution L5.2
(a) Rate law: Rate (first order), because nucleophile concentration has no effect — consistent with a rate-determining ionisation step (classic ). (b) For a first-order reaction, half-life , so .
- The substrate has larger by , so its half-life is smaller by :
- The huge rate jump is Carbocation stability in action: the cation forms faster because it is so much lower in energy.
Recall Solution L5.3
Rule: Saytzeff — the more substituted (but-2-ene) is major.
- Major:minor .
- Consistent with Saytzeff since the disubstituted alkene (but-2-ene) is favoured by hyperconjugation. See E1 vs E2 mechanisms and Leaving groups ( is a good leaving group, enabling the elimination).
Recall Master check — say each answer out loud
L1.1 type? ::: Addition (hydrogenation). L1.2 type? ::: Nucleophilic substitution. L1.3 type? ::: Elimination (dehydration). L2.1 major product? ::: 2-bromopropane (Markovnikov). L2.2 major alkene? ::: but-2-ene (Saytzeff). L3.2 stereochemical outcome? ::: Racemisation (). L4.1 product & extra step? ::: 2-methylbutan-2-ol via + 1,2-methyl shift. L5.2(b) tertiary half-life? ::: s. L5.3 major:minor ratio? ::: .