Before the traps, lock down the three ideas the whole page leans on. Each has a figure — read the picture, then the words.
What a 3c–2e bond looks like. In an ordinary bond one electron pair glues two atoms. In diborane there aren't enough electrons for that everywhere, so one pair is smeared over three atoms — the B–H–B "banana". Look at the figure: the shaded lobe touches both borons and the hydrogen at once.
What back-bonding (pπ–pπ) looks like. In BX3 boron has an empty2pz orbital sticking up. A halogen with a full lone-pair p orbital can tip that pair sideways into B's empty lobe — this sideways (π) donation is back-bonding. It matters how well the two lobes overlap.
Recall Where does the "6887 kJ/mol" come from?
It is the sum of boron's first three ionisation enthalpies (energy to strip 3 electrons one by one): ΔiH1+ΔiH2+ΔiH3≈801+2427+3660=6888 kJ/mol. Forming an ionic solid or hydrated ion releases lattice/hydration energy of at most a couple of thousand kJ/mol for a small +3 cation — nowhere near enough to pay back ~6900. So the ionic route is a net energy loss and B3+ never forms.
False. Boron has no d-orbitals at any energy, so it cannot expand its octet beyond a covalency of 4 — the largest fluoride ion it forms is BF4−. Aluminium (period 3) can enlist its high-lying 3d orbitals when surrounded by strongly electronegative F, reaching covalency 6.
A free B3+ ion is present in BF3.
False. Stripping 3 electrons costs ≈6887 kJ/mol (sum of the first three ionisation enthalpies), never recovered by lattice or hydration energy, so B never forms a naked cation — every bond in BF3 is covalent.
BF3 is the strongest Lewis acid of the boron halides because F is most electronegative.
False. Electronegativity would help acidity, but it is overruled by strong 2p–2p back-bonding (see the overlap figure above): F donates its lone pair so well into B's empty 2pz that B is nearly satisfied, making BF3 the weakest acid. See Back-bonding (pπ–pπ).
Diborane contains a direct B–B σ-bond like the C–C bond in ethane.
False. The two borons are joined only through the two bridging hydrogens (two 3c–2e B–H–B bonds shown in figure s01); with just 12 valence electrons an ethane-like skeleton (needing 16) is impossible.
Borazine and benzene are equally unreactive because both are aromatic.
False. Borazine's ring is polar (Bδ+, Nδ− — partial, not full, charges) because N is more electronegative, so it readily adds reagents like HCl, whereas benzene resists addition.
Boron is a metal because it sits in Group 13 with Al, Ga, In, Tl.
False. Boron is a hard, non-metallic metalloid; its tiny size and high ionisation enthalpy prevent it from losing electrons ionically, unlike the genuinely metallic members below it.
All B–H bonds in B2H6 are identical in length.
False. The four terminal B–H bonds (≈119 pm) are shorter and stronger than the two bridging B–H bonds (≈133 pm), because a bridge spreads one electron pair over three atoms — thinner electron glue, longer bond (figure s01).
B2O3 and SiO2 are both acidic covalent oxides.
True. This is direct evidence of the B–Si diagonal relationship — both are glassy, weakly acidic giant-covalent oxides rather than basic ionic oxides.
"In B2H6 there are 8 normal 2c–2e B–H bonds, so 16 valence electrons are used."
The molecule has only 12 valence electrons (2×3+6×1). It cannot afford 8 ordinary bonds, which is exactly why it uses two 3c–2e bridges (4 terminal 2c–2e + 2 bridging 3c–2e = 12).
"BCl3+3H2O→BCl3⋅3H2O (a stable hydrate)."
Wrong product — BCl3 is fully hydrolysed: BCl3+3H2O→H3BO3+3HCl. B has an empty orbital that water's lone pair attacks, so it never survives as an intact hydrate. See Boric Acid H3BO3.
"Boron forms B3+ and then sp3-hybridises to make BF4−."
There is no B3+ step; B is always covalent. BF4− forms when neutral BF3 (a Lewis acid) accepts a fluoride lone pair into its empty 2pz.
"Because Cl is bigger than F, BCl3 has stronger back-bonding than BF3."
Reversed. Bigger, more diffuse Cl 3p orbitals overlap worse with B's compact 2p (right panel of figure s02), so back-bonding is weaker in BCl3 — which is precisely why BCl3 is the stronger acid.
"Borazine is C6H6 with three carbons swapped for boron."
Borazine is B3N3H6 — carbons are replaced in alternating pairs by one B and one N, whose electrons average to 4 (like two carbons). It is isoelectronic with benzene but not a simple substitution.
"Diagonal relationship links B with the element directly below it, Al."
The diagonal partner is Si (one period down and one group right). Al is the group neighbour and behaves as a metal; the diagonal cancellation of trends is what makes B resemble Si instead.
Why does Lewis acidity increase down the boron halides (BF3<BCl3<BBr3<BI3)?
As the halogen gets larger (F→I), its lone-pair p-orbital grows more diffuse and overlaps the small B 2p ever more poorly (figure s02), so back-donation weakens and B stays electron-hungry — a hungrier B is a stronger acid.
Why can boron never expand its octet while aluminium can?
Boron's valence shell is only 2s2p with no d-orbitals, capping covalency at 4; Al has 3d orbitals which, though high in energy, drop low enough to bond when very electronegative atoms surround it, letting Al reach covalency 6.
Why is B2H6 called "electron-deficient"?
It has fewer valence electrons (12) than it would need for a conventional 2c–2e bond on every link (16), forcing it to spread pairs over three atoms.
Why does B behave chemically like Si (diagonal relationship)?
Electronegativity rises across a period and falls down a group; along the B→Si diagonal these two effects cancel, giving both atoms a similar electronegativity and charge/size ratio (polarising power). See Ionisation Enthalpy Trends.
Why is BF3 still a Lewis acid at all, given that F back-donates so well?
Back-bonding only partially fills the empty 2pz; boron remains net electron-deficient, so it still accepts a full lone pair (e.g. forming F3B←NH3) — just less eagerly than the heavier halides. See Boron Trihalides.
Why is borazine planar?
Each N's filled 2pz lone pair overlaps sideways with the empty 2pz of the neighbouring B, and this only works if all six p-orbitals stand parallel and perpendicular to the ring — which forces the ring flat. The result is a delocalised 6-electron π cloud (three N→B donations resonating around the ring), the same flat, aromatic-like arrangement as benzene.
Why does boron form covalent hydrides while its group neighbours' behaviour differs?
Its small size and high ionisation enthalpy make electron sharing (covalency), not electron loss (ionic bonding), energetically favourable — the same reason it resembles a non-metal.
Is BF4− possible but BF63− impossible? Explain the boundary.
Yes — 4 is boron's maximum covalency (four bonds fill its four valence orbitals 2s+2px+2py+2pz). A sixth bond would require d-orbitals it does not possess at any energy.
What holds the two borons together in B2H6 if there is no B–B bond?
Two bridging B–H–B 3c–2e "banana" bonds (figure s01) — each single electron pair binds both borons and the hydrogen between them simultaneously.
In the symmetric cleavage B2H6+2NMe3→2Me3N⋅BH3, what happens to the bridge?
The two 3c–2e bridges break evenly, splitting the molecule into two identical BH3 units, each of which accepts a nitrogen lone pair to satisfy boron's empty orbital.
What is the limiting reason B3+ hydration cannot rescue the ionic route?
Even the very large hydration energy of a hypothetical tiny B3+ falls far short of the enormous ∼6887 kJ/mol needed to strip three electrons, so the ionic option is never thermodynamically viable.
If we replace both bridging H in diborane conceptually with lone pairs, does the structure still work?
No — the bridges are the only way to distribute the scarce 12 electrons; remove them and boron's octet collapses to 6 with no bonding between the two halves.
Does borazine's aromaticity make it as stable as benzene under attack by HCl?
No — its polar B–N π ring provides electrophilic (Bδ+) and nucleophilic (Nδ−) sites, so HCl adds across the ring, unlike inert benzene. Compare with p-Block Overview.