2.5.15Thermodynamics (Chemical)

ΔG° and equilibrium constant - ΔG° = −RT ln K

1,903 words9 min readdifficulty · medium1 backlinks

WHAT are we talking about?

The single most important relation:   ΔG=ΔG+RTlnQ  \boxed{\;\Delta G = \Delta G^\circ + RT\ln Q\;} and its equilibrium special case:   ΔG=RTlnK  \boxed{\;\Delta G^\circ = -RT\ln K\;}


WHY should this be true? (Derivation from scratch)

Step 1 — Free energy of one substance depends on its pressure. For 1 mole of an ideal gas at constant TT, dG=VdPdG = V\,dP (from dG=VdPSdTdG = V\,dP - S\,dT, with dT=0dT=0). Using V=RT/PV = RT/P: dG=RTPdP    PPdG=RTPPdPPdG = \frac{RT}{P}\,dP \;\Rightarrow\; \int_{P^\circ}^{P} dG = RT\int_{P^\circ}^{P}\frac{dP}{P} G(P)=G+RTlnPPG(P) = G^\circ + RT\ln\frac{P}{P^\circ} Why this step? Chemical potential grows logarithmically with pressure — squeezing gas costs free energy, and the cost is RTln(ratio)RT\ln(\text{ratio}). Write μ=μ+RTlna\mu = \mu^\circ + RT\ln a where a=P/Pa=P/P^\circ is the activity.

Step 2 — Build ΔG\Delta G for a reaction. For aA+bBcC+dDaA + bB \rightleftharpoons cC + dD: ΔG=νiμi=(cμC+dμD)(aμA+bμB)\Delta G = \sum \nu_i \mu_i = \big(c\mu_C + d\mu_D\big) - \big(a\mu_A + b\mu_B\big) Substitute each μi=μi+RTlnai\mu_i = \mu_i^\circ + RT\ln a_i: ΔG=(cμC+dμDaμAbμB)ΔG+RT(clnaC+dlnaDalnaAblnaB)\Delta G = \underbrace{\Big(c\mu_C^\circ+d\mu_D^\circ - a\mu_A^\circ - b\mu_B^\circ\Big)}_{\Delta G^\circ} + RT\Big(c\ln a_C + d\ln a_D - a\ln a_A - b\ln a_B\Big) The log terms collapse using lnxn=nlnx\ln x^n = n\ln x and lnx+lny=lnxy\ln x+\ln y=\ln xy: ΔG=ΔG+RTlnaCcaDdaAaaBbQ\Delta G = \Delta G^\circ + RT\ln\underbrace{\frac{a_C^{\,c}\,a_D^{\,d}}{a_A^{\,a}\,a_B^{\,b}}}_{Q} Why this step? This is just algebra collecting all the logs into one quotient QQ — the exact shape of the equilibrium expression.

Step 3 — Impose equilibrium. At equilibrium the system has no tendency to change, so ΔG=0\Delta G = 0 and Q=KQ = K: 0=ΔG+RTlnK    ΔG=RTlnK0 = \Delta G^\circ + RT\ln K \;\Rightarrow\; \Delta G^\circ = -RT\ln K Why this step? ΔG\Delta G is the slope of GG vs extent of reaction. At the minimum of GG (equilibrium) the slope is zero. That single physical fact is what pins ΔG\Delta G^\circ to KK.

Figure — ΔG° and equilibrium constant -  ΔG° = −RT ln K

HOW to read the formula


Worked examples


Common mistakes (steel-manned)


Active recall

Recall Predict before you check (Forecast-then-Verify)

If TT doubles at fixed ΔG<0\Delta G^\circ<0, does KK move toward 1 or away? (Answer: lnK=ΔG/RT\ln K = -\Delta G^\circ/RT shrinks in magnitude ⇒ KK moves toward 1.)

What is the relation between ΔG\Delta G^\circ and KK?
ΔG=RTlnK\Delta G^\circ = -RT\ln K (equivalently K=eΔG/RTK=e^{-\Delta G^\circ/RT}).
Difference between ΔG\Delta G and ΔG\Delta G^\circ?
ΔG\Delta G = at actual composition (depends on QQ); ΔG\Delta G^\circ = all species in standard states, a constant tied to KK.
General equation linking ΔG\Delta G, QQ, ΔG\Delta G^\circ?
ΔG=ΔG+RTlnQ\Delta G = \Delta G^\circ + RT\ln Q.
Why is ΔG=0\Delta G=0 at equilibrium?
GG is minimum vs extent of reaction, so its slope (=ΔG\Delta G) is zero.
Sign of ΔG\Delta G^\circ when K>1K>1?
Negative (lnK>0\ln K>0).
Can a reaction with ΔG>0\Delta G^\circ>0 proceed forward?
Yes, if Q<KQ<K so that ΔG<0\Delta G<0.
What decides the actual direction of a real mixture?
Comparing QQ with KK (i.e. the sign of ΔG\Delta G), not ΔG\Delta G^\circ.
Base-10 form of the relation?
ΔG=2.303RTlogK\Delta G^\circ = -2.303\,RT\log K.
Why is KK dimensionless?
It is built from activities (P/PP/P^\circ, c/cc/c^\circ), which are unitless.
Where does the RTlnRT\ln term come from physically?
From μ=μ+RTlna\mu=\mu^\circ+RT\ln a, i.e. dG=VdP=RTdP/PdG=V\,dP=RT\,dP/P integrated.
Recall Feynman: explain to a 12-year-old

Imagine a ball rolling in a valley. The bottom of the valley is where the reaction "settles" — that's equilibrium. ΔG\Delta G^\circ tells you how deep and where the bottom is: a very deep valley on the "products" side means the reaction almost completely turns into products (huge KK). If the valley bottom is more toward "reactants," you get a small KK. The formula ΔG=RTlnK\Delta G^\circ=-RT\ln K is just the mathematical rule linking "how deep/where the valley sits" to "how much product you end with."


Connections

Concept Map

sum over species

derived from

integrate ideal gas

current activities

part of

set ΔG = 0 at min of G

gives

rearrange

value of Q at equilibrium

ΔG° < 0

ΔG° > 0

G = G° + RT ln a

ΔG = ΔG° + RT ln Q

chemical potential μ = μ° + RT ln a

dG = V dP at const T

reaction quotient Q

ΔG° standard state constant

Equilibrium: ΔG = 0, Q = K

ΔG° = −RT ln K

K = e^(−ΔG°/RT)

equilibrium constant K

large K, near completion

small K, favors reactants

Hinglish (regional understanding)

Intuition Hinglish mein samjho

Dekho, thermodynamics mein sabse important rishta yahi hai: ΔG=RTlnK\Delta G^\circ = -RT\ln K. Iska matlab simple hai — reaction ka standard free energy change humein bata deta hai ki equilibrium par products zyada banenge ya reactants. Agar ΔG\Delta G^\circ bahut negative hai, to KK bahut bada hoga, yaani reaction almost poora products mein convert ho jaayega. Agar ΔG\Delta G^\circ positive hai, to KK chhota, matlab mostly reactants hi bache rahenge.

Ek cheez hamesha yaad rakho: ΔG\Delta G aur ΔG\Delta G^\circ alag hain. ΔG\Delta G^\circ ek fixed constant hai (jab saare species standard state mein ho), jabki ΔG\Delta G current mixture par depend karta hai — uska formula hai ΔG=ΔG+RTlnQ\Delta G = \Delta G^\circ + RT\ln Q. Equilibrium par ΔG\Delta G zero ho jaata hai (kyunki GG ki valley ka bottom aa gaya, slope zero), aur tab Q=KQ=K ho jaata hai — bas yahin se ΔG=RTlnK\Delta G^\circ = -RT\ln K nikalta hai.

Bahut students yeh galti karte hain ki ΔG>0\Delta G^\circ > 0 dekhte hi bol dete hain "reaction hoga hi nahi". Galat! Agar starting mein product kam hai (yaani Q<KQ<K), to ΔG\Delta G negative ban sakta hai aur reaction forward chalega. Direction hamesha QQ aur KK compare karke decide hota hai, sirf ΔG\Delta G^\circ se nahi.

Practical tip: numbers plug karte waqt units match karo — ΔG\Delta G^\circ ko Joule mein le lo (kJ ko ×1000) taaki R=8.314R=8.314 ke saath sahi bethe. Aur KK hamesha dimensionless hota hai kyunki wo activities (P/PP/P^\circ) se banta hai. Yeh ek formula tumhare equilibrium aur spontaneity dono chapters ko jod deta hai — isliye ratta nahi, derivation samajh lo.

Go deeper — visual, from zero

Test yourself — Thermodynamics (Chemical)

Connections