2.5.6 · D5Thermodynamics (Chemical)
Question bank — Heat capacities Cp, Cv; relationship Cp − Cv = nR (ideal gas)
Self-contained symbol kit (read first)
Everything used on this page, restated so you never leave:
The picture below is the whole story: at constant the heat arrow feeds only the -tank; at constant the same heat splits, and the extra sliver is the expansion tax .

True or false — justify
The relation holds for a single mole of any gas at any pressure
False — it is exact only for an ideal gas; real gases follow (symbols defined in the Edge cases section) and only approach at low pressure. See van der Waals gases.
For liquids and solids, and are essentially equal
True — they barely expand when heated, so the "expansion tax" is tiny and .
is always greater than for a substance that expands on heating
True — heating at constant pressure must also pay for expansion work against the surroundings, so it needs extra heat, making .
For an ideal gas, only when the volume is held constant
False — for an ideal gas depends only on , so holds in every process (isobaric, isothermal, adiabatic). See Internal Energy.
The heat capacity ratio increases as a molecule gains more degrees of freedom
False — more modes raise , and since , a larger lowers . See Degrees of Freedom.
Along an isothermal ideal-gas process, even though heat flows in
True — constant means ; all the heat leaves as work. See Isothermal vs Adiabatic Processes.
A monatomic ideal gas has regardless of which element it is
True — with only 3 translational modes, and for He, Ar, Ne alike, giving .
Molar heat capacity and specific heat capacity are numerically the same for a given gas
False — molar is per mole, specific is per gram; they differ by the molar mass, .
Spot the error
"Since the derivation of just used the first law and enthalpy, it must apply to all matter."
The hidden ideal-gas steps are (no intermolecular forces) and (ideal gas law); both fail for real gases, so the generality is false.
"At constant volume no work is done, therefore ."
Wrong capacity — at constant volume , so ; belongs to the constant-pressure path.
" uses enthalpy only as a mathematical trick with no physical meaning."
Enthalpy captures the internal energy plus the work; at constant pressure , so genuinely counts the expansion energy. See Enthalpy.
"For 3 moles of gas, Mayer's relation gives ."
If are molar (per mole) it is still just ; the form applies only when they are the total (extensive) heat capacities.
"Since an adiabatic process transfers no heat, we cannot use or there."
We still can — holds in any ideal-gas process, and actually governs the adiabatic curve . See Adiabatic Process.
"Water's heat capacity is , so its molar value is also ."
That is per gram; multiplying by the molar mass gives per mole.
"The extra heat in the constant-pressure case became internal energy that we can recover later."
No — that extra left the system as expansion work pushing the piston; it is not stored in the gas.
Why questions
Why does involve enthalpy while involves internal energy ?
At constant , ; at constant , , so enthalpy automatically bundles in the work. See First Law of Thermodynamics.
Why is the difference exactly per mole and not some other constant?
Because for an ideal gas at constant pressure, so the per-mole expansion cost per kelvin is precisely . See Ideal Gas Law.
Why does adding degrees of freedom leave unchanged but change ?
New modes add equally to both and , so their difference stays , but their ratio shrinks toward 1.
Why can we treat as path-independent for an ideal gas?
depends only on (no intermolecular potential energy), so any two states at the same temperature have the same no matter the route.
Why does the real-gas correction take the form ?
The general (exact, any-substance) result is , where is how eagerly the volume swells per kelvin, and is how easily it is squeezed by pressure. Heating at constant expands the material by ; that expansion does work, but a stiffer material (small ) resists more, so the "tax" grows with how much it expands () and shrinks with how squishy it is — the picture below traces this chain.

Edge cases
First, the two coefficients the real-gas formula needs, in plain words:
For a monatomic ideal gas at very low temperature, does change from ?
No — a point-like monatomic gas has no rotational/vibrational modes to freeze out, so and down to where it liquefies.
For a diatomic gas heated to very high temperature so vibrations activate, what happens to ?
Vibrational modes raise (toward ), lowering from toward . See Degrees of Freedom.
In a free (Joule) expansion of an ideal gas into vacuum, is any expansion "tax" paid?
No — with no external pressure, and , so is unchanged; there is no cost here despite the volume growing.
As pressure , does a real gas's approach ?
Yes — in the dilute limit intermolecular forces vanish and the gas behaves ideally, so . See Real Gases (van der Waals).
Can a material ever have
Not from the ideal-gas (always positive), but for a real substance with negative — cold water between 0 °C and 4 °C shrinks when heated — you might expect a flip; however the formula carries , so and still holds. It reaches exact equality () only right where (water at 4 °C).
Can ever equal zero for an ideal gas?
No — even a monatomic ideal gas has ; some translational storage always exists, so is finite.
If a gas is heated at constant pressure but is prevented from expanding, which capacity applies?
Then the volume is actually fixed, so no work is done and — the "constant pressure" label is misleading if .
Recall One-line summary of every trap
is ideal-gas-only and per-mole; the exact any-substance version is (because of ) so always, with equality where ; is always true for an ideal gas; more degrees of freedom lower but never touch the difference ; and the extra constant-pressure heat is spent, not stored.
Connections
- First Law of Thermodynamics — the source of and .
- Enthalpy — why carries the work.
- Ideal Gas Law — supplies .
- Degrees of Freedom — controls and hence .
- Internal Energy — why is path-independent.
- Adiabatic Process · Isothermal vs Adiabatic Processes — where and reappear.
- Real Gases (van der Waals) — where breaks.