Intuition The ONE core idea
An oxidation number is a pretend charge : we imagine that every shared electron in a bond is grabbed entirely by the greedier atom, then count how many electrons each atom is "up" or "down" from neutral. Everything in this topic — the rules, the counting equation, oxidation vs reduction — is just careful counting of that one make-believe scoreboard.
This page assumes nothing . Before you can assign a single oxidation number, you need to genuinely understand a handful of small ideas: what an atom's charge is, what "sharing electrons" means, what "greedy" (electronegative) means, why a lone atom scores zero, and what the little symbols you'll meet (like + 6 , the "add-them-all" sign, and the target charge) are shouting at you. We build each one, in order, from the ground — every symbol is defined before it is used.
Look at the figure. Two atoms are joined by a bond — a shared pair of electrons (the two dots in the middle). In reality that pair sits between them, tugged slightly toward the greedier atom. The whole trick of oxidation numbers is the thought experiment on the right : we pretend the greedy atom snatches BOTH electrons completely. Once we do that pretend snatch, each atom has a clean whole-number charge — and those charges are the oxidation numbers.
Hold this image. Every rule below is a shortcut for doing this pretend-snatch quickly.
A tiny particle carrying one unit of negative charge , written − 1 (or e − ). Atoms are built from a positive nucleus surrounded by these negative electrons.
Think of an electron as a single negatively-charged marble orbiting the atom. Oxidation numbers are, from start to finish, a way of asking: how many marbles does this atom "own" compared to when it was neutral and alone?
Owns fewer marbles than neutral ⇒ positive oxidation number.
Owns more marbles than neutral ⇒ negative oxidation number.
Owns exactly the same as neutral ⇒ oxidation number zero .
The symbol e − means "one electron." When we later write "Z n loses 2 e − ," that literally means "zinc's scoreboard drops two marbles."
Intuition Why a sign, not just a size
The sign tells you the direction of the imbalance, and the size tells you how much . When you read "S is + 6 in H 2 S O 4 ," parse it as: in the pretend fully-ionic world, sulfur is missing six electrons. The + is not decoration — flip it to − and you've said the opposite physical thing.
Common mistake The sign is easy to drop
Writing "6 " instead of "+ 6 " is a real error, not laziness — a bare number hides whether the atom gave or gained electrons, which is the ENTIRE point of the topic.
Definition Free (elemental) state and the zero rule
An atom is in its free or elemental state when it is bonded only to copies of itself (or to nothing at all): N a , O 2 , P 4 , C l 2 , a lump of iron. In that state its oxidation number is ==0 ==.
Intuition WHY free elements score zero (from the marble picture)
Go back to the pretend-snatch. A bond between two identical atoms — the two oxygens in O 2 , say — is a tug-of-war between equally greedy players. Neither can win the rope, so we split the shared pair right down the middle : each atom keeps exactly what it brought.
If each atom keeps its own electrons, none is short and none is extra ⇒ each still "owns" the same marbles it had when neutral ⇒ oxidation number 0 . A single uncombined atom like N a has no bonds at all, so trivially it is neutral: 0 .
This is the starting point of every reaction table: zinc metal begins at 0 , oxygen gas begins at 0 . Without this default you'd have nothing to measure change against.
Definition Electronegativity
A measure of how strongly an atom pulls shared bonding electrons toward itself . Higher electronegativity = greedier.
Intuition The picture (tug-of-war)
Every bond between different atoms is a tug-of-war over the shared electron pair. The more electronegative atom wins the rope and drags the pair closer to itself. Fluorine is the greediest of all; oxygen is second; metals like sodium are among the least greedy (they let go easily).
For the trends behind who wins, see Electronegativity & periodic trends . You do NOT need to memorise values — you only need the ranking F > O > N ≈ C l > ⋯ > H > metals .
The figure shows the tug-of-war: in H – O , oxygen (mint, greedy) drags the pair; in the pretend-ionic world it keeps both electrons, so O reads − 2 overall in water and each H reads + 1 .
Notice each rule is just "who wins the rope": fluorine always wins, so it's always − 1 ; oxygen usually wins (so − 2 ) but loses to fluorine (so + 2 in O F 2 ). Full worked derivations live in the parent rules note ; here we only need to recognise them.
Definition Bond, molecule, ion
Bond = a shared pair of electrons holding two atoms together (the line in H – O – H ).
Molecule = a neutral group of bonded atoms (e.g. H 2 O , net charge 0 ).
Ion = a charged group of atoms — it has extra or missing electrons overall (e.g. C r 2 O 7 2 − , net charge − 2 ).
Intuition Why the difference matters
The oxidation numbers of all the atoms in a piece of matter must add up to that piece's overall charge . For a neutral molecule that target is 0 ; for an ion it is the ion's charge.
Common mistake The most common wrong answer
Students set the total to 0 even for an ion , because neutral compounds are more familiar. But C r 2 O 7 2 − carries a real − 2 , so its oxidation numbers must add to − 2 , not 0 . Always read the superscript charge first and use that as your target.
Worked example Reading a formula
In C r 2 O 7 2 − :
C r 2 means 2 chromium atoms (the small 2 is a subscript = a count).
O 7 means 7 oxygen atoms.
the 2 − (a superscript ) is the net charge of the whole ion: − 2 .
Subscript = how many atoms. Superscript = the charge. They live in different corners for a reason.
Definition Oxidation number notation
Written as a signed number attached to an element: S is + 6 , O is − 2 . Sometimes drawn above the symbol like S + 6 .
Intuition What it looks like vs a real charge
A real ionic charge (N a + ) is written as a superscript on the atom: N a + . An oxidation number is a bookkeeping value we write separately or above the atom. They can coincide (for N a + both are + 1 ) but they are different ideas: the oxidation number is the pretend-snatch result, the real charge is what an instrument would measure.
Common mistake "Oxidation number = the atom's real charge"
It feels true because for a monatomic ion like N a + the two numbers match. But in a covalent molecule the oxidation number is pure make-believe: sulfur reads + 6 in H 2 S O 4 yet carries no real + 6 charge — the electrons were only pretend -snatched. Keep the two ideas in separate boxes.
Definition The "sum" symbol
∑
∑ (the Greek capital sigma) is shorthand for the instruction "add up all the terms of this kind." The little i underneath is a counter that walks through each element in the formula, one at a time.
∑ i n i ⋅ ( ox no ) i = Q species
Intuition Why this equation exists at all
Electrons are only moved around , never created or destroyed. So the pretend charges must reconcile to the real total charge Q — there's no extra electron hiding anywhere. That conservation is what makes the sum rule true, and it's the tool that lets you solve for one unknown atom (like x for sulfur) using simple algebra.
The figure builds the H 2 S O 4 equation piece by piece so you can see each factor n i ⋅ ( ox no ) i becoming a bar, and the bars cancelling to 0 .
x and solving a linear equation
When one atom's oxidation number is unknown, we call it x , write the sum rule, and isolate x by undoing additions and multiplications.
Worked example The whole algebra, from zero, for
H 2 S O 4
2 ( + 1 ) + x + 4 ( − 2 ) = 0
Multiply the known counts: 2 ( + 1 ) = + 2 and 4 ( − 2 ) = − 8 .
Collect: 2 + x − 8 = 0 ⇒ x − 6 = 0 .
Move the − 6 across (add 6 to both sides): x = + 6 .
That's it — no calculus, no fractions unless the atoms genuinely aren't equivalent. If they aren't (like the four sulfurs in S 4 O 6 2 − ), x comes out as an average and can be fractional (+ 2.5 ). A fraction is a signal, not a mistake.
Definition Oxidation and reduction (as directions)
Oxidation = oxidation number goes up (atom loses electrons).
Reduction = oxidation number goes down (atom gains electrons).
Intuition The number line picture
Put oxidation numbers on a number line. Moving right (− 2 → + 2 ) is oxidation — the atom shed electrons. Moving left (+ 2 → 0 ) is reduction. In any reaction the total rightward movement must equal the total leftward movement, because every electron one atom loses another atom gains. That balance is the doorway to Redox reactions — balancing (half-reaction & ion-electron) and to Oxidising and reducing agents . Note the free-element zero from Section 3 is your fixed reference point — you measure every change from it.
O xidation I s L oss, R eduction I s G ain (of electrons). The atom that is oxidised gave electrons away, so it is the reducing agent .
Electron = one negative marble
Charge and plus minus signs
Oxidation number = pretend charge
Electronegativity = greedy atom wins
The oxidation number rules
Net charge Q of the species
Assign every oxidation number
Everything on this page funnels into the parent: the oxidation-number rules note .
Cover the right side and test yourself — if any answer is fuzzy, reread that section before the parent note.
What does an electron carry, and how is it written? One unit of negative charge, written − 1 or e − .
What does a + 3 charge mean physically? The atom is short 3 electrons compared to neutral (too positive).
What is the oxidation number of an atom in its free (elemental) state, and why? 0 — it is bonded only to identical atoms (or none), so the shared pairs split evenly and it keeps exactly its own electrons.
Give three examples of free elements. N a , O 2 , P 4 (also C l 2 , a lump of iron, etc.).
What does electronegativity measure? How strongly an atom pulls shared bonding electrons toward itself — "greediness."
Rank F, O, and H by electronegativity. F > O > H (fluorine greediest, hydrogen least of these).
Why is fluorine always − 1 in compounds? It is the greediest element, so it always wins the tug-of-war and keeps the shared electrons.
In C r 2 O 7 2 − , what does the subscript 7 mean vs the superscript 2 − ? Subscript 7 = number of oxygen atoms; superscript 2 − = the ion's net charge.
What is the target sum for a neutral molecule vs an ion? 0 for a neutral molecule; the ion's charge for an ion.
What does Q stand for in the sum rule? The net charge of the whole species.
What does ∑ i n i ( ox no ) i instruct you to do? For each element, multiply its atom count by its oxidation number, then add all those products.
Why does the sum rule equal the net charge? Electrons are only redistributed, never created or destroyed, so pretend charges must reconcile to the real total.
Solve 2 ( + 1 ) + x + 4 ( − 2 ) = 0 . x = + 6 .
Why can an oxidation number be fractional like + 2.5 ? It is an average over atoms that are not all equivalent — bookkeeping, not a real per-atom charge.
On a number line, which direction is oxidation? Rightward (increase in oxidation number) = loss of electrons.
What does OIL RIG stand for? Oxidation Is Loss, Reduction Is Gain (of electrons).