(a) 0.00506 — the leading 0.00 are placeholders that only locate the decimal point, so they are not significant. Then 5, the sandwiched 0, and 6 are all significant. → 3 sig figs.
(b) 4500. — the decimal point is written, so all trailing zeros are deliberate. 4,5,0,0 → 4 sig figs. (Without the point, 4500 would be ambiguous.)
(c) 2.0080 — 2 significant; the two middle zeros are sandwiched → significant; trailing 0 after decimal → significant. 2,0,0,8,0 → 5 sig figs.
(d) 0.100 — leading 0 not significant; 1 significant; two trailing zeros after a decimal → significant. → 3 sig figs.
Recall Solution 1.2
In N×10nevery digit of N is significant, which is exactly why we use it (see Scientific notation and orders of magnitude).
0.00506=3 digits⇒5.06×10−3.
2.0080=5 digits⇒2.0080×100 (keep all five zeros/digits).
(a) 0.0034567 — significant digits are 3,4,5,6,7. Keep 3,4,5; decider is the next digit 6>5 → round up → 3.46×10−3. Answer: 0.00346.
(b) 12.750 — keep 1,2,7; decider is 5 with a trailing 0 after it (nothing non-zero follows) → round half to even. The kept digit is 7 (odd) → bump to 8. Answer: 12.8.
(c) 12.650 — keep 1,2,6; decider 5, nothing non-zero after → round to even. Kept digit 6 is already even → leave it. Answer: 12.6.
Recall Solution 2.2
(a) Multiplication → fewest sig figs. Raw =6.28. Factors: 3.14 (3 sf), 2.0 (2 sf). min=2, so we keep 2 sig figs (6.3). The digit being dropped is the last one, 8; since 8>5 → round the kept 2up to 3. Answer: 6.3.
(b) Addition → fewest decimal places. Raw =91.469. Decimal places: 88.4 (1), 3.06 (2), 0.009 (3). Fewest =1. Round to 1 decimal place: the first dropped digit is 6>5 → round up. Answer: 91.5.
Goal: justify every digit; handle degenerate and edge cases.
Recall Solution 5.1
Significant digits of 0.09995 are 9,9,9,5 (leading 0.0 are placeholders).
Keep the first three 9s; the first dropped digit is the final 5 with nothing after → round half to even. The kept digit is 9 (odd), so we must round up.
Rounding 999→1000 triggers a cascade carry: 0.09995→0.100.
Answer: 0.100 (still 3 sig figs: 1,0,0). Cleanly: 1.00×10−1. (This is why writing the trailing zeros matters — dropping them would lie about the precision.)
Recall Solution 5.2
Difference =87.54−87.49=0.05 g.
Decimal-place rule: both terms have 2 decimal places, so the answer keeps 2 decimal places → 0.05 g. That is correct.
But count the sig figs: 0.05 has only 1 significant figure, even though each input had 4. This is called loss of significance: subtracting two nearly-equal numbers throws away leading digits.
Lesson: the decimal-place rule kept us honest, but the result is far less precise than the inputs. Any further calculation using 0.05 is now capped at 1 sig fig. (See Uncertainty and error propagation.)
Recall Solution 5.3
ρ=25.0/20.00=1.25g/mL exactly.
Sig figs: 25.0 (3 sf) ÷20.00 (4 sf) → min=3.
Correct precision is 3 sig figs: 1.25 g/mL.
The student's 1.250 claims 4 sig figs — that trailing 0 is invented certainty. Not justified.
Answer: 1.25 g/mL (3 sig figs).
Recall One-line self-quiz
When is an exact number allowed to reduce your answer's sig figs? ::: Never — counted or defined numbers have infinite sig figs and cannot cap precision.