Level 3 — ProductionPrimary vs Secondary Market & IPOs

Primary vs Secondary Market & IPOs

45 minutes60 marksprintable — key stays hidden on paper

Level 3 — Production (From-Scratch Derivations & Explain-Out-Loud)

Time Limit: 45 minutes Total Marks: 60


Instructions: Show all working. Where calculations are required, state formulas from memory. "Explain-out-loud" questions expect a structured, reasoned narrative — not one-liners.


Q1. [10 marks] — Explain-out-loud: Primary vs Secondary Market Machinery

From scratch, construct a full comparison of the primary and secondary markets. Your answer must address, for each market: (a) who the money flows to, (b) the pricing mechanism, (c) two typical instruments/transactions, and (d) why a company cannot raise fresh capital in the secondary market. Conclude by explaining how an IPO acts as the bridge between the two.


Q2. [12 marks] — Derive the IPO subscription & allotment arithmetic

A book-built IPO has:

  • Price band \95$100$, lot size = 15 shares
  • Total shares on offer to Retail category = 4,00,000 shares
  • Retail applications received (all at cut-off): 1,20,000 applicants, each applying for exactly 1 lot

(a) Compute the retail subscription (oversubscription) multiple. [3] (b) Under proportionate allotment with a minimum-one-lot guarantee, explain from first principles why not every applicant can get a lot, and compute how many applicants receive an allotment. [4] (c) Describe the lottery mechanism SEBI mandates when the category is oversubscribed and one lot cannot be given to all. [3] (d) If the stock lists at \134,computethelistinggainperallottedlot(assumecutoff=, compute the listing gain per allotted lot (assume cut-off = $100$). [2]


Q3. [10 marks] — Book Building vs Fixed Price (code-from-memory)

Write pseudocode (or clean Python-style logic, from memory) for a function discover_cutoff(bids, shares_available) that takes a list of bids [(price, quantity), ...] and the total shares available, and returns the cut-off / issue price using the book-building demand-aggregation principle (highest price at which the full issue is subscribed). Then, in 3–4 sentences, contrast this with how price is fixed in a fixed-price IPO.


Q4. [10 marks] — Reading a DRHP + Role of Merchant Bankers

(a) Name and describe four distinct sections you would examine in a Draft Red Herring Prospectus, and state the decision each section helps an investor make. [6] (b) Explain the difference between a firm-commitment underwriting and a best-efforts arrangement, and why the merchant banker's role in a "red herring" prospectus means the price is not yet fixed. [4]


Q5. [10 marks] — Distinguish the fund-raising routes (structured derivation)

For each of the following, state (i) whether fresh capital reaches the company or not, and (ii) one defining feature: FPO, OFS, QIP, Private Placement. [8] Then explain why an OFS does not dilute existing shareholders in the way an FPO fresh-issue does. [2]


Q6. [8 marks] — Anchor Investors & Grey Market Premium

(a) Explain the purpose of the anchor investor allotment and state the lock-in logic that protects retail investors. [4] (b) An IPO has issue price \100andaGreyMarketPremium(GMP)ofand a Grey Market Premium (GMP) of$45$. Compute the GMP-implied expected listing price and expected % listing gain. State clearly why GMP is not a guaranteed or regulated figure. [4]


Answer keyMark scheme & solutions

Q1 (10 marks)

Point Primary Secondary Marks
Money flows to Issuing company (fresh capital) Selling investor, not company 2
Pricing Fixed price / book-built band set by issuer + merchant banker Continuous supply-demand at exchange 2
Instruments IPO, FPO, rights, private placement Buying/selling listed shares, bonds 2
Why no fresh capital in secondary Shares change ownership between investors; company already received money at issue 2

Bridge (2): IPO is the first sale of shares by the company to the public (primary market event); once listed, those same shares trade among investors on the exchange (secondary market). Thus the IPO is the one-time crossover point where a share moves from primary issuance to perpetual secondary trading.


Q2 (12 marks)

(a) Subscription multiple [3] Shares demanded = 1,20,000×15=18,00,0001{,}20{,}000 \times 15 = 18{,}00{,}000. Shares available = 4,00,0004{,}00{,}000. Multiple=18,00,0004,00,000=4.5× (oversubscribed)\text{Multiple} = \frac{18{,}00{,}000}{4{,}00{,}000} = 4.5\times \text{ (oversubscribed)} (demand 1; available 1; ratio 1)

(b) Why not all get a lot + count [4] Minimum allotment = 1 lot = 15 shares. Max lots that can be distributed = 4,00,000/15=26,666.6726,6664{,}00{,}000 / 15 = 26{,}666.67 \Rightarrow 26{,}666 full lots (1 mark: integer floor because a partial lot cannot be allotted). Applicants = 1,20,000 but only 26,666 lots exist ⇒ impossible to give everyone even one lot (2 marks reasoning). Therefore 26,666 applicants receive one lot each (1 mark).

(c) Lottery mechanism [3] When a category is oversubscribed such that even the minimum one lot cannot be given to all applicants, SEBI mandates allotment by a computerised random lottery/draw (1). Every valid applicant is treated equally with equal probability (1); winners get exactly one lot, the rest get full refund/unblock of ASBA funds (1).

(d) Listing gain per lot [2] ($134$100)×15=$34×15=$510 per lot(\$134-\$100)\times 15 = \$34 \times 15 = \$510 \text{ per lot} (gain per share 1; ×15 = 1)


Q3 (10 marks)

Pseudocode [6] (award for: sorting descending, cumulative aggregation, threshold return)

def discover_cutoff(bids, shares_available):
    # bids: list of (price, quantity)
    # sort by price DESCENDING (highest willingness first)
    bids.sort(key=lambda b: b[0], reverse=True)
    cumulative = 0
    for price, qty in bids:
        cumulative += qty
        if cumulative >= shares_available:
            return price          # highest price at which issue fully subscribed
    return None                   # under-subscribed: no valid cut-off

Marks: correct descending sort (2), cumulative demand aggregation (2), return highest price meeting full subscription (2).

Fixed-price contrast [4]: In a fixed-price issue the price is declared upfront in the prospectus by the issuer/merchant banker; investors simply accept or reject it and full application money is paid at that single price. Demand is only known after the issue closes, whereas book-building discovers the price from the bid book within a band before finalisation.


Q4 (10 marks)

(a) Four DRHP sections [6] — 1.5 each (section + decision):

  • Objects of the Issue → how the raised money will be used; decides if capital use is value-creating.
  • Risk Factors → business/regulatory/financial risks; decides risk appetite fit.
  • Financial Statements / Restated Financials → revenue, profit, margins, debt; decides valuation reasonableness.
  • Promoter & Management / Shareholding → who controls the company, promoter holding post-issue; decides governance trust. (Also acceptable: Capital Structure, Legal Proceedings, Industry Overview, Basis for Issue Price.)

(b) Underwriting + red herring [4]:

  • Firm-commitment (2): underwriter buys the entire issue and resells, bearing the risk of unsold shares.
  • Best-efforts (1): underwriter only agrees to try to sell; unsold portion returns to the issuer, no purchase obligation.
  • Red herring / price not fixed (1): a "red herring" prospectus omits the final price/number of shares (price band only); the exact price is set post book-building, hence still preliminary.

Q5 (10 marks)

(i)/(ii) table [8] — 2 marks each:

Route Fresh capital to company? Defining feature
FPO Yes (fresh issue) or OFS-type — but classic FPO raises fresh capital Already-listed company issues additional shares to public
OFS No — money goes to selling promoters/shareholders Existing shares sold via exchange mechanism (often to meet min public shareholding)
QIP Yes Fresh shares placed with Qualified Institutional Buyers only, fast route, no full prospectus
Private Placement Yes Shares/securities offered to a select small group (<200 persons), not public

OFS non-dilution [2]: In an OFS, existing shares merely change hands from promoter to buyer — total share count is unchanged, so EPS/ownership % is not diluted. An FPO fresh-issue creates new shares, increasing total count and diluting existing holders' proportional stake.


Q6 (8 marks)

(a) Anchor investors [4]:

  • Purpose: large institutional investors are allotted shares 1 day before the IPO opens, at a fixed price, to build confidence and signal quality/demand to retail (2).
  • Lock-in logic: anchor shares carry a mandatory lock-in (part 30 days, part 90 days under current SEBI norms) so anchors cannot immediately dump shares on listing, protecting retail from a supply crash (2).

(b) GMP calc [4]: Implied listing price = 100 + 45 = \145(1).Expected(1). Expected % gain= \dfrac{45}{100}\times 100 = 45%$ (1). Why not guaranteed (2): GMP is an unofficial, unregulated price traded in an informal (grey) market before listing; it reflects sentiment/speculation, has no legal backing, can swing sharply, and actual listing price frequently differs.


[
  {"claim":"Retail subscription multiple = 4.5x", "code":"demanded=120000*15; available=400000; result=(demanded/available==Rational(45,10))"},
  {"claim":"Number of applicants getting a lot = 26666", "code":"lots=400000//15; result=(lots==26666)"},
  {"claim":"Listing gain per lot at 134 vs 100 = 510", "code":"result=((134-100)*15==510)"},
  {"claim":"GMP implied listing price=145 and gain=45%", "code":"lp=100+45; pct=Rational(45,100)*100; result=(lp==145 and pct==45)"}
]