Level 4 — ApplicationMaterials & Atomic Structure

Materials & Atomic Structure

60 minutes60 marksprintable — key stays hidden on paper

Level: 4 (Application — novel/unseen problems, no hints) Time limit: 60 minutes Total marks: 60


Question 1 — Carrier Concentration & Conductivity (14 marks)

A slab of intrinsic silicon at T=300 KT = 300\text{ K} has an intrinsic carrier concentration ni=1.5×1010 cm3n_i = 1.5 \times 10^{10}\ \text{cm}^{-3}. The electron mobility is μn=1350 cm2/V⋅s\mu_n = 1350\ \text{cm}^2/\text{V·s} and the hole mobility is μp=480 cm2/V⋅s\mu_p = 480\ \text{cm}^2/\text{V·s}. The electronic charge is q=1.6×1019 Cq = 1.6 \times 10^{-19}\ \text{C}.

(a) Compute the intrinsic conductivity σi\sigma_i of the silicon in (Ωcm)1(\Omega\cdot\text{cm})^{-1}. (4)

(b) The slab is now doped uniformly with phosphorus at ND=5×1016 cm3N_D = 5 \times 10^{16}\ \text{cm}^{-3} (full ionisation). State the majority and minority carrier types, then compute the majority carrier concentration and the minority carrier concentration using np=ni2n \cdot p = n_i^2. (5)

(c) Compute the conductivity of the doped sample and state, with a numerical ratio, by what factor it changed relative to the intrinsic case. (5)


Question 2 — Bonding & Lattice Geometry (12 marks)

(a) Silicon has 14 electrons. Write out its shell occupancy using the Bohr model, and hence explain why silicon forms four covalent bonds. (4)

(b) In the silicon diamond-cubic lattice each atom sits at the centre of a regular tetrahedron of nearest neighbours. Given the nearest-neighbour bond length d=0.235 nmd = 0.235\ \text{nm}, calculate the cubic lattice constant aa, using the geometric relation d=34ad = \dfrac{\sqrt{3}}{4}\,a. (4)

(c) Explain why this rigid, fully-bonded tetrahedral structure means pure silicon behaves as an insulator at 0 K0\text{ K} but as a semiconductor at room temperature. (4)


Question 3 — Thermal Effects (12 marks)

The intrinsic carrier concentration of a semiconductor follows

ni(T)=CT3/2exp ⁣(Eg2kT)n_i(T) = C\,T^{3/2}\exp\!\left(-\frac{E_g}{2kT}\right)

where k=8.62×105 eV/Kk = 8.62 \times 10^{-5}\ \text{eV/K}.

(a) For silicon, Eg=1.12 eVE_g = 1.12\ \text{eV}. Taking the ratio ni(350)ni(300)\dfrac{n_i(350)}{n_i(300)}, and treating the T3/2T^{3/2} pre-factor and CC as constant across this range (so only the exponential varies), compute this ratio. (6)

(b) Repeat part (a) for germanium, Eg=0.66 eVE_g = 0.66\ \text{eV}, over the same temperature range. (4)

(c) Using your two results, explain in terms of leakage current why silicon is preferred over germanium for devices operating at elevated temperature. (2)


Question 4 — Compound Semiconductor Selection (12 marks)

An engineer must choose a semiconductor for each of the following applications. For each, name one suitable material from {Si, Ge, GaAs, GaN, SiC} and justify the choice in one or two sentences using a physical property.

(a) A blue LED. (3) (b) A high-frequency, high-electron-mobility RF amplifier. (3) (c) A high-power, high-temperature power module for an electric-vehicle inverter. (3) (d) A low-cost mass-produced logic microprocessor. (3)


Question 5 — Extrinsic Doping Analysis (10 marks)

A silicon sample is doped with both boron (acceptors) at NA=2×1016 cm3N_A = 2 \times 10^{16}\ \text{cm}^{-3} and phosphorus (donors) at ND=3×1016 cm3N_D = 3 \times 10^{16}\ \text{cm}^{-3}, both fully ionised. Take ni=1.5×1010 cm3n_i = 1.5 \times 10^{10}\ \text{cm}^{-3}.

(a) State whether the sample is n-type or p-type, and give the net doping concentration. (3)

(b) Using charge neutrality with net doping N=NDNAN = N_D - N_A and np=ni2n p = n_i^2, compute the equilibrium electron and hole concentrations. (5)

(c) State what this "compensation" of donors and acceptors means physically for the effective carrier count. (2)


End of paper

Answer keyMark scheme & solutions

Question 1

(a) Intrinsic: n=p=nin = p = n_i. σi=qni(μn+μp)\sigma_i = q\,n_i(\mu_n + \mu_p)

  • Formula (1)
  • μn+μp=1830 cm2/V⋅s\mu_n+\mu_p = 1830\ \text{cm}^2/\text{V·s} (1)
  • σi=(1.6×1019)(1.5×1010)(1830)\sigma_i = (1.6\times10^{-19})(1.5\times10^{10})(1830) (1)
  • =4.392×106 (Ωcm)1= 4.392\times10^{-6}\ (\Omega\cdot\text{cm})^{-1} (1)

(b) Phosphorus = donor → majority = electrons (n-type), minority = holes (1). Full ionisation: nND=5×1016 cm3n \approx N_D = 5\times10^{16}\ \text{cm}^{-3} (2). p=ni2/n=(1.5×1010)2/(5×1016)=2.25×1020/5×1016=4.5×103 cm3p = n_i^2/n = (1.5\times10^{10})^2 / (5\times10^{16}) = 2.25\times10^{20}/5\times10^{16} = 4.5\times10^{3}\ \text{cm}^{-3} (2).

(c) Since npn \gg p, σqnμn\sigma \approx q n \mu_n (1): σ=(1.6×1019)(5×1016)(1350)=10.8 (Ωcm)1\sigma = (1.6\times10^{-19})(5\times10^{16})(1350) = 10.8\ (\Omega\cdot\text{cm})^{-1} (2) Ratio =10.8/4.392×1062.46×106= 10.8 / 4.392\times10^{-6} \approx 2.46\times10^{6} (2) — conductivity increased ~2.5 million times, showing the dramatic effect of doping.


Question 2

(a) Shells: 2,8,42, 8, 4 (K=2, L=8, M=4) (2). The outer (valence) shell has 4 electrons; it shares each with a neighbour to reach a stable octet of 8, hence four covalent bonds (2).

(b) d=34aa=4d3d = \frac{\sqrt3}{4}a \Rightarrow a = \frac{4d}{\sqrt3} (1) =4×0.2351.732= \frac{4 \times 0.235}{1.732} (1) =0.9401.732= \frac{0.940}{1.732} (1) =0.5427 nm= 0.5427\ \text{nm} (1). (Accept ≈0.543 nm.)

(c) At 0 K0\text{ K} all four valence electrons of every atom are locked in covalent bonds — no free carriers → insulator (2). At room temperature thermal energy breaks a small fraction of bonds, generating electron–hole pairs that carry current → semiconductor (2).


Question 3

(a) With pre-factor cancelled, ni(350)ni(300)=exp ⁣[Eg2k(13501300)]\frac{n_i(350)}{n_i(300)} = \exp\!\left[-\frac{E_g}{2k}\left(\frac1{350}-\frac1{300}\right)\right] (2) Eg2k=1.122(8.62×105)=6497.7\frac{E_g}{2k} = \frac{1.12}{2(8.62\times10^{-5})} = 6497.7 K (1) 13501300=0.00285710.0033333=4.7619×104\frac1{350}-\frac1{300} = 0.0028571 - 0.0033333 = -4.7619\times10^{-4} (1) Exponent =6497.7×(4.7619×104)=3.094= -6497.7 \times (-4.7619\times10^{-4}) = 3.094 (1) Ratio =e3.09422.1= e^{3.094} \approx 22.1 (1)

(b) Eg2k=0.662(8.62×105)=3828.3\frac{E_g}{2k} = \frac{0.66}{2(8.62\times10^{-5})} = 3828.3 K (1) Exponent =3828.3×4.7619×104=1.8230= 3828.3 \times 4.7619\times10^{-4} = 1.8230 (1) Ratio =e1.8236.19= e^{1.823} \approx 6.19 (2)

(c) Silicon's larger bandgap makes nin_i (and thus thermally-generated leakage current) far less temperature-sensitive; germanium's smaller gap causes leakage to rise steeply with heat, so silicon holds up better at elevated temperature (2).


Question 4

(a) GaN — wide bandgap (~3.4 eV) gives photon emission in the blue/UV range (3). (b) GaAs — very high electron mobility (~8500 cm²/V·s), ideal for high-frequency RF (3). (c) SiC — wide bandgap, high thermal conductivity and high breakdown field suit high-power, high-temperature switching (3). (d) Si — cheap, abundant, mature fabrication and stable native oxide for mass logic ICs (3). (Accept equivalent well-justified choices; marks for correct material + valid physical reason.)


Question 5

(a) ND>NAN_D > N_A so net donors → n-type (1). Net N=NDNA=3×10162×1016=1×1016 cm3N = N_D - N_A = 3\times10^{16} - 2\times10^{16} = 1\times10^{16}\ \text{cm}^{-3} (2).

(b) Since NniN \gg n_i: nN=1×1016 cm3n \approx N = 1\times10^{16}\ \text{cm}^{-3} (3). p=ni2/n=2.25×1020/1×1016=2.25×104 cm3p = n_i^2/n = 2.25\times10^{20}/1\times10^{16} = 2.25\times10^{4}\ \text{cm}^{-3} (2).

(c) The 2×10¹⁶ acceptors cancel (compensate) 2×10¹⁶ of the donors; only the difference contributes free carriers, so effective doping is reduced to the net value 1×10¹⁶ (2).

[
  {"claim":"Q1a intrinsic conductivity ~4.392e-6",
   "code":"q=1.6e-19; ni=1.5e10; sig=q*ni*(1350+480); result = abs(sig-4.392e-6) < 1e-9"},
  {"claim":"Q1b minority hole conc = 4.5e3",
   "code":"ni=1.5e10; ND=5e16; p=ni**2/ND; result = abs(p-4.5e3) < 1"},
  {"claim":"Q1c doped conductivity = 10.8 and ratio ~2.46e6",
   "code":"q=1.6e-19; sig=q*5e16*1350; sigi=q*1.5e10*1830; result = abs(sig-10.8)<1e-6 and abs(sig/sigi-2.459e6) < 5e3"},
  {"claim":"Q2b lattice constant a ~0.5427 nm",
   "code":"a=4*0.235/sqrt(3); result = abs(float(a)-0.5427) < 0.001"},
  {"claim":"Q3a Si ratio ~22.1",
   "code":"k=8.62e-5; Eg=1.12; r=exp(-Eg/(2*k)*(Rational(1,350)-Rational(1,300))); result = abs(float(r)-22.1) < 0.3"},
  {"claim":"Q3b Ge ratio ~6.19",
   "code":"k=8.62e-5; Eg=0.66; r=exp(-Eg/(2*k)*(Rational(1,350)-Rational(1,300))); result = abs(float(r)-6.19) < 0.15"},
  {"claim":"Q5b p = 2.25e4",
   "code":"ni=1.5e10; n=1e16; p=ni**2/n; result = abs(p-2.25e4) < 1"}
]