Level 5 — MasteryQuantum Atomic Structure

Quantum Atomic Structure

75 minutes60 marksprintable — key stays hidden on paper

Time limit: 75 minutes Total marks: 60 Instructions: Attempt all three questions. Show all working, justify each physical assumption, and state constants used. Calculators and a coding environment are permitted where indicated.

Useful constants: h=6.626×1034 J sh = 6.626\times10^{-34}\ \text{J s}, c=3.00×108 m s1c = 3.00\times10^8\ \text{m s}^{-1}, me=9.109×1031 kgm_e = 9.109\times10^{-31}\ \text{kg}, =1.055×1034 J s\hbar = 1.055\times10^{-34}\ \text{J s}, 1 eV=1.602×1019 J1\ \text{eV} = 1.602\times10^{-19}\ \text{J}, NA=6.022×1023 mol1N_A = 6.022\times10^{23}\ \text{mol}^{-1}.


Question 1 — Photon–matter duality bridge (20 marks)

A clean sodium surface (work function ϕ=2.28 eV\phi = 2.28\ \text{eV}) is illuminated with monochromatic UV light of wavelength λ=250 nm\lambda = 250\ \text{nm}.

(a) Using Einstein's photon model, derive the maximum kinetic energy KmaxK_{\max} of ejected photoelectrons from first principles (E=hνE=h\nu), and compute KmaxK_{\max} in eV. (5)

(b) These photoelectrons are then decelerated to rest and re-accelerated so that their de Broglie wavelength equals the wavelength of the incident light (250 nm). Determine the kinetic energy (in eV) the electrons must have. Comment on why it differs so enormously from KmaxK_{\max}. (6)

(c) Prove algebraically that for a non-relativistic particle the ratio of a photon's energy to that of a massive particle of equal wavelength is EphotonEparticle=2mcλh.\frac{E_{\text{photon}}}{E_{\text{particle}}} = \frac{2 m c \lambda}{h}. Evaluate this ratio for an electron at λ=250 nm\lambda = 250\ \text{nm} and interpret the number. (6)

(d) State one experimental observation from the photoelectric effect that Planck's/Einstein's quantum model explains but classical wave theory cannot. (3)


Question 2 — Uncertainty, orbitals and quantum numbers (20 marks)

(a) An electron is confined within an atom to a region of size Δx=1.0×1010 m\Delta x = 1.0\times10^{-10}\ \text{m} (roughly one atomic diameter). Using ΔxΔp/2\Delta x\,\Delta p \ge \hbar/2, compute the minimum uncertainty in its velocity, and hence estimate the minimum kinetic energy scale (in eV) of a bound electron. Comment on the consistency of this magnitude with electron binding energies. (7)

(b) For the subshell defined by n=4, l=2n=4,\ l=2: (i) name the subshell and give the allowed mlm_l values; (ii) state the maximum number of electrons and justify it using the Pauli exclusion principle; (iii) sketch/describe the orbital shape and state the number of angular nodes. (6)

(c) A student claims a valid electron has quantum numbers (n,l,ml,ms)=(3,3,1,+12)(n,l,m_l,m_s) = (3,\,3,\,-1,\,+\tfrac12). Determine whether this set is allowed. For each quantum number, state the rule constraining it and identify precisely which rule is violated (if any). (4)

(d) Explain, in terms of the Heisenberg principle, why the concept of a fixed electron "orbit" (Bohr) is superseded by orbital probability clouds. (3)


Question 3 — Aufbau, exceptions and a filling algorithm (20 marks)

(a) State the Madelung (n+ln+l) rule and use it to write the full ground-state electron configuration of chromium (Z=24Z=24) and copper (Z=29Z=29). Explain, using the stability of half-filled and fully-filled subshells, why both deviate from the naive Aufbau prediction. (8)

(b) Apply Hund's rule of maximum multiplicity to determine the number of unpaired electrons in the ground-state atoms of Fe (Z=26)\text{Fe}\ (Z=26) and Cr (Z=24)\text{Cr}\ (Z=24). Show the 3d3d/4s4s orbital-box diagrams. (6)

(c) Coding/derivation. Write clear pseudocode (or Python) for a function fill_order(max_nl) that returns the sequence of (n,l)(n,l) subshells in Madelung order: sort by increasing n+ln+l, breaking ties by increasing nn. Then hand-trace your algorithm to list the first 8 subshells and confirm they reproduce the standard filling order 1s,2s,2p,3s,3p,4s,3d,4p1s,2s,2p,3s,3p,4s,3d,4p. (6)


Answer keyMark scheme & solutions

Question 1

(a) Photon energy E=hν=hc/λE=h\nu = hc/\lambda. E=(6.626×1034)(3.00×108)250×109=7.951×1019 J=4.96 eVE = \dfrac{(6.626\times10^{-34})(3.00\times10^8)}{250\times10^{-9}} = 7.951\times10^{-19}\ \text{J} = 4.96\ \text{eV}. (2) — correct E=hc/λE=hc/\lambda (1), value (1). Einstein equation: Kmax=hνϕ=4.962.28=2.68 eVK_{\max}=h\nu-\phi = 4.96 - 2.28 = 2.68\ \text{eV}. (3) — statement of photon model conservation (1), subtraction (1), answer (1).

(b) de Broglie: λ=h/pp=h/λ\lambda = h/p \Rightarrow p = h/\lambda. p=6.626×1034250×109=2.650×1027 kg m/sp = \dfrac{6.626\times10^{-34}}{250\times10^{-9}} = 2.650\times10^{-27}\ \text{kg m/s}. (2) K=p22me=(2.650×1027)22(9.109×1031)=3.856×1024 J=2.41×105 eVK = \dfrac{p^2}{2m_e} = \dfrac{(2.650\times10^{-27})^2}{2(9.109\times10^{-31})} = 3.856\times10^{-24}\ \text{J} = 2.41\times10^{-5}\ \text{eV}. (2) Comment: the electron KE (105\sim10^{-5} eV) is ~10510^5 times smaller than the photon energy at the same wavelength, because a photon (massless) carries energy hc/λ1/λhc/\lambda \propto 1/\lambda, whereas a massive electron of the same λ\lambda carries p2/2m1/λ2p^2/2m \propto 1/\lambda^2 but is heavily suppressed by its mass. (2)

(c) Photon: Eph=hc/λE_{ph}=hc/\lambda. Particle: Ep=p22m=(h/λ)22m=h22mλ2E_p=\dfrac{p^2}{2m}=\dfrac{(h/\lambda)^2}{2m}=\dfrac{h^2}{2m\lambda^2}. (2) Ratio: EphEp=hc/λh2/(2mλ2)=hcλ2mλ2h2=2mcλh\dfrac{E_{ph}}{E_p}=\dfrac{hc/\lambda}{h^2/(2m\lambda^2)}=\dfrac{hc}{\lambda}\cdot\dfrac{2m\lambda^2}{h^2}=\dfrac{2mc\lambda}{h}. ∎ (2) Evaluate (electron): 2(9.109×1031)(3.00×108)(250×109)6.626×1034=2.06×105\dfrac{2(9.109\times10^{-31})(3.00\times10^8)(250\times10^{-9})}{6.626\times10^{-34}} = 2.06\times10^{5}. (1) Interpretation: at equal wavelength the photon carries ~2×1052\times10^5 times more energy — consistent with part (b). (1)

(d) Any one (3): existence of a threshold frequency below which no emission occurs regardless of intensity; instantaneous emission; KmaxK_{\max} depends on frequency not intensity (intensity only affects photocurrent). Classical waves predict energy accumulation → no threshold and a time-delay.

Question 2

(a) Δp2Δx=1.055×10342(1.0×1010)=5.28×1025 kg m/s\Delta p \ge \dfrac{\hbar}{2\Delta x}=\dfrac{1.055\times10^{-34}}{2(1.0\times10^{-10})}=5.28\times10^{-25}\ \text{kg m/s}. (2) Δv=Δp/me=5.28×10259.109×1031=5.79×105 m/s\Delta v = \Delta p/m_e = \dfrac{5.28\times10^{-25}}{9.109\times10^{-31}} = 5.79\times10^{5}\ \text{m/s}. (2) Energy scale (Δp)22me=(5.28×1025)22(9.109×1031)=1.53×1019 J=0.95 eV\sim \dfrac{(\Delta p)^2}{2m_e}=\dfrac{(5.28\times10^{-25})^2}{2(9.109\times10^{-31})}=1.53\times10^{-19}\ \text{J}=0.95\ \text{eV}. (2) Comment: this is of order a few eV, consistent with actual atomic binding/ionisation energies (~eV–tens of eV), so quantum confinement naturally produces electron energies on the correct scale. (1)

(b) (i) n=4,l=2n=4,l=24d subshell; ml=2,1,0,+1,+2m_l=-2,-1,0,+1,+2 (five values). (2) (ii) Each orbital holds 2 electrons (opposite spin); 5 orbitals ⇒ max 10 electrons. Pauli: no two electrons in an atom share all four quantum numbers, so within one orbital the two electrons must differ in msm_s (±12\pm\tfrac12). (2) (iii) d-orbital: cloverleaf (four lobes) shape (except dz2d_{z^2}); angular nodes =l=2=l=2. (2)

(c) Rules: n1n\ge1 integer (OK, n=3n=3); l=0..n1l=0..n-1 ⇒ for n=3n=3, l2l\le2. Here l=3l=3 violates ln1l\le n-1. mlm_l must lie in l..+l-l..+l; ms=±12m_s=\pm\tfrac12 (OK). Set is NOT allowed — the azimuthal quantum number l=3l=3 is impossible when n=3n=3. (4) — identifying ll violation (2), correct statement of all rules (2).

(d) Heisenberg: ΔxΔp/2\Delta x\,\Delta p\ge\hbar/2 means position and momentum cannot both be exactly known; a Bohr orbit specifies both a definite radius and momentum simultaneously, which is forbidden. Hence we replace fixed orbits with probability distributions (orbitals) giving the likelihood of finding the electron in a region. (3)

Question 3

(a) Madelung rule: subshells fill in order of increasing n+ln+l; for equal n+ln+l, lower nn first. (2) Naive: Cr → [Ar]3d44s2[\text{Ar}]3d^4 4s^2; Cu → [Ar]3d94s2[\text{Ar}]3d^9 4s^2. Actual: Cr =[Ar]3d54s1=[\text{Ar}]3d^5 4s^1, Cu =[Ar]3d104s1=[\text{Ar}]3d^{10}4s^1. (3) Explanation: a half-filled (3d53d^5) and fully-filled (3d103d^{10}) subshell gives extra stability (symmetric charge distribution + maximal exchange energy). Promoting one 4s4s electron to 3d3d achieves this favourable configuration; small 4s4s3d3d energy gap makes the trade-off net-stabilising. (3)

(b) Fe (Z=26Z=26): [Ar]3d64s2[\text{Ar}]3d^6 4s^2. 3d3d boxes: ↑↓ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ⇒ 4 unpaired electrons; 4s4s full. (3) Cr (Z=24Z=24): [Ar]3d54s1[\text{Ar}]3d^5 4s^1. 3d3d: ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ (all singly, Hund), 4s4s: ↑ ⇒ 6 unpaired electrons. (3)

(c) Pseudocode / Python:

def fill_order(max_nl):
    subs = []
    for n in range(1, max_nl+1):
        for l in range(0, n):        # l = 0..n-1
            subs.append((n, l))
    subs.sort(key=lambda s: (s[0]+s[1], s[0]))  # n+l, then n
    return subs

Hand-trace (first 8, with n+ln+l): 1s(1),2s(2),2p(3),3s(3),3p(4),4s(4),3d(5),4p(5)1s(1),2s(2),2p(3),3s(3),3p(4),4s(4),3d(5),4p(5) → matches required order. (6) — correct sort key (3), correct trace (3).

[
{"claim":"Kmax of Na photoelectrons at 250nm is 2.68 eV","code":"h=6.626e-34; c=3.00e8; lam=250e-9; eV=1.602e-19; phi=2.28; E=h*c/lam/eV; K=E-phi; result = abs(K-2.68)<0.02"},
{"claim":"Electron KE for lambda 250nm is ~2.41e-5 eV","code":"h=6.626e-34; lam=250e-9; me=9.109e-31; eV=1.602e-19; p=h/lam; K=p**2/(2*me)/eV; result = abs(K-2.41e-5)<1e-6"},
{"claim":"Photon/particle energy ratio for electron at 250nm ~2.06e5","code":"h=6.626e-34; c=3.00e8; me=9.109e-31; lam=250e-9; r=2*me*c*lam/h; result = abs(r-2.06e5)/2.06e5 < 0.01"},
{"claim":"Madelung fill_order reproduces standard first-8 order","code":"subs=[]; \nfor n in range(1,6):\n    for l in range(0,n):\n        subs.append((n,l))\nsubs.sort(key=lambda s:(s[0]+s[1],s[0])); expected=[(1,0),(2,0),(2,1),(3,0),(3,1),(4,0),(3,2),(4,1)]; result = subs[:8]==expected"}
]