Level 5 — MasteryNuclear & Radiochemistry

Nuclear & Radiochemistry

90 minutes60 marksprintable — key stays hidden on paper

Level: 5 (Mastery — cross-domain: math + physics + computation) Time limit: 90 minutes Total marks: 60

Instructions: Attempt all three questions. Show all reasoning. Use u=931.494 MeV/c2u = 931.494\ \text{MeV}/c^2, ln2=0.6931\ln 2 = 0.6931, NA=6.022×1023N_A = 6.022\times10^{23}. Atomic masses (u): 12H=2.014102^{2}_{1}\text{H}=2.014102, 13H=3.016049^{3}_{1}\text{H}=3.016049, 24He=4.002602^{4}_{2}\text{He}=4.002602, n=1.008665n=1.008665, 11H=1.007825^{1}_{1}\text{H}=1.007825.


Question 1 — Decay kinetics, series & dating (20 marks)

A rock sample contains a decay chain segment AλABλBC(stable)A \xrightarrow{\lambda_A} B \xrightarrow{\lambda_B} C\,(\text{stable}).

(a) Starting from NA(0)=N0N_A(0)=N_0, NB(0)=0N_B(0)=0, derive from first-order rate laws the expression for NB(t)N_B(t). State clearly the ODE you solve and the integrating-factor step. (6)

(b) Show that NBN_B is maximal at tmax=ln(λB/λA)λBλA.t_{\max}=\frac{\ln(\lambda_B/\lambda_A)}{\lambda_B-\lambda_A}. (4)

(c) A 14^{14}C dating problem: a wooden artefact shows a specific activity of 9.609.60 disintegrations per minute per gram of carbon, while living material gives 15.30 dpm/g15.30\ \text{dpm/g}. The half-life of 14^{14}C is 57305730 yr. Compute the age of the artefact. (5)

(d) Explain, in terms of the assumption of constant atmospheric 14C/12C^{14}\text{C}/^{12}\text{C}, one physical reason why raw radiocarbon ages require calibration, and state whether uncalibrated ages tend to be too young or too old for samples formed during a period of higher past atmospheric 14^{14}C. (5)


Question 2 — Binding energy, Q-values & fusion (22 marks)

(a) Define binding energy per nucleon and explain, using the shape of the B/AB/A curve, why both fission of heavy nuclei and fusion of light nuclei release energy. Identify the approximate mass number of the peak. (4)

(b) For the D–T reaction 12H+13H24He+n^{2}_{1}\text{H} + {^{3}_{1}\text{H}} \longrightarrow {^{4}_{2}\text{He}} + n compute the QQ-value in MeV from the masses given. Show the mass defect calculation. (6)

(c) Of the QQ released in (b), determine the kinetic energy carried by the neutron, assuming the reactants are essentially at rest (non-relativistic momentum conservation, use mass numbers 4 and 1 for the products). Comment on why this fraction matters for reactor wall/breeding design. (6)

(d) The solar p–p chain net reaction is 41H4He+2e++2νe4\,^{1}\text{H}\to {^{4}\text{He}} + 2e^{+} + 2\nu_e. Using the mass of 1^{1}H and 4^{4}He and accounting for the two positrons (me=0.000549 um_e = 0.000549\ \text{u}), compute the energy released per 4^{4}He formed (in MeV), and explain why the atomic-mass table already includes the electron correction that must be handled carefully here. (6)


Question 3 — Reactor/activity computation + radiation safety (18 marks)

A hospital receives a 99Mo/99mTc^{99}\text{Mo}/^{99m}\text{Tc} generator. 99m^{99m}Tc has t1/2=6.0t_{1/2}=6.0 h.

(a) A freshly eluted sample of 99m^{99m}Tc has activity A0=7.4 GBqA_0 = 7.4\ \text{GBq}. Write a short pseudocode / Python-style function activity(t) returning activity in GBq at time tt hours, and use it to compute the activity after 9.09.0 h. (6)

(b) Compute the number of 99m^{99m}Tc atoms present at t=0t=0. (4)

(c) A technician receives a whole-body absorbed dose of 0.20 mGy0.20\ \text{mGy} of γ\gamma radiation. Given a radiation weighting factor wR=1w_R = 1 for γ\gamma, state the equivalent dose in mSv and explain the difference in physical meaning between Gy and Sv. (4)

(d) γ\gamma shielding follows I=I0eμxI = I_0 e^{-\mu x}. For a lead shield with μ=1.2 cm1\mu = 1.2\ \text{cm}^{-1}, find the thickness needed to reduce intensity to 1%1\% of incident. (4)

Answer keyMark scheme & solutions

Question 1

(a) ODEs (1): dNAdt=λANA,dNBdt=λANAλBNB.\frac{dN_A}{dt}=-\lambda_A N_A,\qquad \frac{dN_B}{dt}=\lambda_A N_A - \lambda_B N_B. Solve first: NA=N0eλAtN_A = N_0 e^{-\lambda_A t} (1). Substitute: dNBdt+λBNB=λAN0eλAt.\frac{dN_B}{dt}+\lambda_B N_B = \lambda_A N_0 e^{-\lambda_A t}. Integrating factor eλBte^{\lambda_B t} (1): ddt ⁣(NBeλBt)=λAN0e(λBλA)t.\frac{d}{dt}\!\left(N_B e^{\lambda_B t}\right)=\lambda_A N_0 e^{(\lambda_B-\lambda_A)t}. Integrate, apply NB(0)=0N_B(0)=0 (1): NB(t)=λAN0λBλA(eλAteλBt)\boxed{N_B(t)=\frac{\lambda_A N_0}{\lambda_B-\lambda_A}\left(e^{-\lambda_A t}-e^{-\lambda_B t}\right)} (2).

(b) Set dNB/dt=0dN_B/dt=0: λAeλAt+λBeλBt=0-\lambda_A e^{-\lambda_A t}+\lambda_B e^{-\lambda_B t}=0 (1) ⇒ λBeλBt=λAeλAt\lambda_B e^{-\lambda_B t}=\lambda_A e^{-\lambda_A t} (1) ⇒ ln(λB/λA)=(λBλA)t\ln(\lambda_B/\lambda_A)=(\lambda_B-\lambda_A)t (1) ⇒ tmax=ln(λB/λA)λBλAt_{\max}=\dfrac{\ln(\lambda_B/\lambda_A)}{\lambda_B-\lambda_A} (1).

(c) λ=ln2/5730\lambda=\ln2/5730 yr1^{-1}. Age t=1λln ⁣A0A=5730ln2ln ⁣15.309.60t=\dfrac{1}{\lambda}\ln\!\frac{A_0}{A}=\dfrac{5730}{\ln2}\ln\!\frac{15.30}{9.60} (2). ln(15.30/9.60)=ln(1.59375)=0.46628\ln(15.30/9.60)=\ln(1.59375)=0.46628 (1). t=57300.6931(0.46628)=8266.6×0.466283855t=\dfrac{5730}{0.6931}(0.46628)=8266.6\times0.46628\approx 3855 yr (2). ≈ 3.9 × 10³ yr.

(d) Assumption: constant equilibrium 14C/12C^{14}\text{C}/^{12}\text{C} in atmosphere. Real production varies with solar activity and geomagnetic field, and modern fossil-fuel dilution/ bomb spikes alter it (2). Hence calibration against tree-ring/varve records is needed (1). If past atmospheric 14^{14}C was higher, the sample started with more 14^{14}C than assumed; using the modern baseline underestimates initial activity, so the computed age is too young (raw age younger than true) (2).


Question 2

(a) B/AB/A = total nuclear binding energy divided by nucleon number; average energy needed to remove one nucleon (1). Curve rises steeply for light nuclei, peaks near A56A\approx 56 (56^{56}Fe/62^{62}Ni) (1). Moving toward the peak from either side increases B/AB/A, so products are more tightly bound; the excess binding energy is released — fusing light nuclei (up the left slope) and splitting heavy nuclei (up the right slope) both climb toward the peak (2).

(b) Δm=(mD+mT)(mHe+mn)\Delta m = (m_D+m_T)-(m_{He}+m_n) =(2.014102+3.016049)(4.002602+1.008665)= (2.014102+3.016049)-(4.002602+1.008665) (2) =5.0301515.011267=0.018884 u=5.030151-5.011267=0.018884\ \text{u} (2). Q=0.018884×931.494=17.59 MeVQ=0.018884\times931.494=17.59\ \text{MeV} (2). Q ≈ 17.6 MeV.

(c) Momentum conservation: pn=pHep_n=p_{He}, so En/EHe=mHe/mn=4/1E_n/E_{He}=m_{He}/m_n=4/1? Careful: E=p2/2mE=p^2/2m, so E1/mE \propto 1/m. With equal momenta En/Eα=mα/mn=4/1E_n/E_\alpha = m_\alpha/m_n = 4/1 (2). Total KE =Q=17.59=Q=17.59 MeV split so En=mαmα+mnQ=45(17.59)=14.07 MeVE_n=\dfrac{m_\alpha}{m_\alpha+m_n}Q=\dfrac{4}{5}(17.59)=14.07\ \text{MeV} (2). Neutron carries ≈ 14.1 MeV. This high-energy neutron determines wall damage and is captured in a Li blanket (6Li+n4He+T^6\text{Li}+n\to{}^4\text{He}+\text{T}) to breed tritium fuel (2).

(d) Using atomic masses, Q=[4m(1H)m(4He)2me]c2Q=[4m(^1\text{H})-m(^4\text{He})-2m_e]c^2. Atomic 1^1H includes 1 electron (4 total on LHS); atomic 4^4He includes 2 electrons; the reaction emits 2 positrons, so we must subtract 2me2m_e for the positron rest masses explicitly (2). 4(1.007825)=4.0313004(1.007825)=4.031300; minus 4.002602=0.0286984.002602 = 0.028698; minus 2(0.000549)=0.0010982(0.000549)=0.001098Δm=0.027600 u\Delta m=0.027600\ \text{u} (2). Q=0.027600×931.494=25.71 MeVQ=0.027600\times931.494=25.71\ \text{MeV} (2). (The 2 positrons later annihilate adding 2×1.022\approx2\times1.022 MeV; net ~26.7 MeV.)


Question 3

(a)

import math
def activity(t, A0=7.4, thalf=6.0):
    lam = math.log(2)/thalf      # per hour
    return A0*math.exp(-lam*t)   # GBq

(3) At t=9t=9: A=7.4eln29/6=7.421.5=7.4/2.8284=2.616 GBqA=7.4\cdot e^{-\ln2\cdot9/6}=7.4\cdot 2^{-1.5}=7.4/2.8284=2.616\ \text{GBq} (3). ≈ 2.6 GBq.

(b) λ=ln2/(6.0×3600 s)=0.6931/21600=3.209×105 s1\lambda=\ln2/(6.0\times3600\ \text{s})=0.6931/21600=3.209\times10^{-5}\ \text{s}^{-1} (2). A0=λN0N0=A0/λ=7.4×109/3.209×105=2.31×1014A_0=\lambda N_0\Rightarrow N_0=A_0/\lambda=7.4\times10^{9}/3.209\times10^{-5}=2.31\times10^{14} atoms (2).

(c) H=wR×D=1×0.20 mGy=0.20 mSvH = w_R \times D = 1\times0.20\ \text{mGy}=0.20\ \text{mSv} (1). Gy = absorbed energy per kg (J/kg), purely physical; Sv weights that by biological effectiveness (wRw_R) to reflect stochastic health risk (3).

(d) 0.01=eμxx=ln100μ=4.60521.2=3.84 cm0.01=e^{-\mu x}\Rightarrow x=\dfrac{\ln100}{\mu}=\dfrac{4.6052}{1.2}=3.84\ \text{cm} (4).

[
{"claim":"Radiocarbon age ~3855 yr","code":"t=5730/log(2)*log(15.30/9.60); result = abs(float(t)-3855)<15"},
{"claim":"D-T Q-value ~17.59 MeV","code":"dm=(2.014102+3.016049)-(4.002602+1.008665); Q=dm*931.494; result = abs(float(Q)-17.59)<0.05"},
{"claim":"Neutron KE = 14.07 MeV (4/5 of Q)","code":"dm=(2.014102+3.016049)-(4.002602+1.008665); Q=dm*931.494; En=Rational(4,5)*Q; result = abs(float(En)-14.07)<0.05"},
{"claim":"pp-chain Q ~25.71 MeV","code":"dm=4*1.007825-4.002602-2*0.000549; Q=dm*931.494; result = abs(float(Q)-25.71)<0.05"},
{"claim":"Tc-99m activity at 9h ~2.616 GBq","code":"A=7.4*2**Rational(-3,2); result = abs(float(A)-2.616)<0.01"},
{"claim":"Lead shield thickness for 1% ~3.84 cm","code":"x=log(100)/Rational(12,10); result = abs(float(x)-3.838)<0.01"}
]