Level 5 — MasteryGeneral Organic Chemistry (GOC)

General Organic Chemistry (GOC)

75 minutes60 marksprintable — key stays hidden on paper

Level 5 — Mastery (cross-domain: chemistry + mathematics + coding) Time limit: 75 minutes Total marks: 60

Instructions: Attempt all three questions. Show all reasoning. Where code is requested, write clean pseudocode/Python; correctness of logic is marked, not syntax perfection. Use ...... for inline math.


Question 1 — Chirality, counting, and an algorithm (20 marks)

Consider the family of open-chain aldotetroses/aldopentoses type molecules. For this question we work with a linear carbon chain in which some carbons are stereocentres (each carbon bearing 4 different groups).

(a) Prove the general result that a molecule with nn independent stereocentres (no internal symmetry) has exactly 2n2^n stereoisomers, and that these are grouped into 2n12^{n-1} enantiomeric pairs. (4)

(b) Now consider molecules of the type HOOC-CHOH-CHOH-COOH\text{HOOC-CHOH-CHOH-COOH} (tartaric-acid skeleton) which has an internal mirror plane possibility. Enumerate all distinct stereoisomers, identify the meso form(s), and state how many are optically active. Justify using R/SR/S descriptors. (6)

(c) Write a function count_stereoisomers(n, symmetric) (Python) that returns the number of distinct stereoisomers for a linear chain of nn equivalent-by-symmetry stereocentres. It must handle the meso-reduction when symmetric=True, covering both the even-nn and odd-nn cases (the odd case has a central carbon that can lie on the mirror plane). Give the closed-form formulas you implement and explain the odd-nn subtlety. (7)

(d) Specific rotation: a sample of (+)(+)-tartaric acid has [α]D25=+12.0°[\alpha]_D^{25} = +12.0°. A mixture of the (+)(+) and meso forms in a 1dm1\,\mathrm{dm} tube at c=0.20 g/mLc = 0.20\ \mathrm{g/mL} shows an observed rotation of +1.20°+1.20°. Compute the mass fraction of the optically active (+)(+) form. (3)


Question 2 — Electronic effects and carbocation energetics (20 marks)

(a) Rank the following carbocations in increasing order of stability and justify each ordering step invoking hyperconjugation (nβn_\beta = number of β\beta-C–H bonds), inductive (+I+I), and resonance (+M+M) effects: CH3+,(CH3)2CH+,(CH3)3C+,CH2=CHCH2+,C6H5-CH2+.\text{CH}_3^+,\quad (\text{CH}_3)_2\text{CH}^+,\quad (\text{CH}_3)_3\text{C}^+,\quad \text{CH}_2=CH-CH_2^+,\quad \text{C}_6\text{H}_5\text{-}CH_2^+. (6)

(b) A simple additive model estimates relative carbocation stabilization energy as ΔEstab=anβ+bnres\Delta E_{\text{stab}} = a\,n_\beta + b\,n_{\text{res}} where nβn_\beta counts hyperconjugative β\beta-C–H bonds and nresn_{\text{res}} counts equivalent resonance structures beyond the parent. Given experimental relative stabilities (kcal/mol, vs CH3+=0\text{CH}_3^+ = 0): ethyl =36= 36, isopropyl =54= 54, tert-butyl =68= 68. Using ethyl (nβ=3,nres=0n_\beta=3, n_{\text{res}}=0) and tert-butyl (nβ=9,nres=0n_\beta=9, n_{\text{res}}=0) set up and solve for aa, then predict isopropyl (nβ=6n_\beta=6) and compare to experiment. Comment on the model's error. (8)

(c) Draw the curved-arrow mechanism for the rearrangement of the neopentyl cation (CH3)3C-CH2+(\text{CH}_3)_3\text{C-CH}_2^+ to the tert-pentyl cation. Classify the shift (hydride/methyl, 1,2), state the driving force in terms of the stability ordering, and explain why the migrating group moves with its bonding electron pair (heterolysis vs homolysis). (6)


Question 3 — Nomenclature, isomerism, and a proof by exhaustion (20 marks)

(a) For the molecular formula C4H8\text{C}_4\text{H}_8, systematically enumerate all constitutional (structural) isomers and stereoisomers. Give the IUPAC name of each, classify the isomerism relating each pair (chain / position / functional / geometrical), and determine the degree of unsaturation from the formula. (8)

(b) Prove that for an acyclic alkene CnH2n\text{C}_n\text{H}_{2n} the degree of unsaturation is exactly 1, and generalise: derive the formula for degree of unsaturation DoU=2C+2+NHX2\text{DoU} = \frac{2C + 2 + N - H - X}{2} for a molecule CCHHNNOOXX\text{C}_C\text{H}_H\text{N}_N\text{O}_O\text{X}_X, explaining the physical meaning of each term (why O does not appear, why each ring or π\pi-bond contributes 1). (6)

(c) Write a function dou(C, H, N=0, X=0) and apply it to (i) benzene C6H6\text{C}_6\text{H}_6, (ii) pyridine C5H5N\text{C}_5\text{H}_5\text{N}, (iii) chloroacetic acid C2H3ClO2\text{C}_2\text{H}_3\text{ClO}_2. Interpret each result structurally (rings + π\pi-bonds). (6)


Answer keyMark scheme & solutions

Question 1

(a) Proof of 2n2^n (4 marks) Each independent stereocentre has exactly 2 configurations (RR or SS). Configurations are chosen independently, so by the multiplication principle the number of configurational arrangements is 2×2×=2n2\times2\times\cdots = 2^n. (2) Every stereoisomer has a unique mirror image obtained by inverting all centres (RSR\leftrightarrow S at each). Since no internal symmetry, mirror image \ne original, so they pair up: 2n/2=2n12^n/2 = 2^{n-1} enantiomeric pairs. (2)

(b) Tartaric acid enumeration (6 marks) Two stereocentres (C2, C3), formula naive count 22=42^2 = 4. (1) Configurations: (R,R)(R,R), (S,S)(S,S), (R,S)(R,S), (S,R)(S,R).

  • (R,R)(R,R) and (S,S)(S,S) are the enantiomeric pair (+)(+) and ()(-) tartaric acid — both optically active. (2)
  • (R,S)(R,S) and (S,R)(S,R) are identical (superimposable) because the molecule has an internal mirror plane between C2–C3 (same two halves): this is the single meso compound, optically inactive (internally compensated). (2) Total distinct stereoisomers =3= 3 (a ±\pm pair + one meso); 2 are optically active, 1 is inactive. (1)

(c) Code (7 marks) Closed forms:

  • No symmetry: N=2nN = 2^n.
  • Symmetric, nn even: N=2n1+2n/21N = 2^{n-1} + 2^{n/2 - 1} (the added term counts meso forms; pairs (config,mirror)(config,\text{mirror}) that coincide).
  • Symmetric, nn odd: central carbon lies on the mirror plane and is not a stereocentre in the symmetric case; N=2n1+2(n1)/2N = 2^{n-1} + 2^{(n-1)/2}.
def count_stereoisomers(n, symmetric=False):
    if not symmetric:
        return 2**n
    if n % 2 == 0:              # even: no central carbon on plane
        return 2**(n-1) + 2**(n//2 - 1)
    else:                       # odd: central carbon on mirror plane
        return 2**(n-1) + 2**((n-1)//2)

Marks: correct non-symmetric (1), even meso formula (2), odd formula (2), working code (1), explanation of odd subtlety — the central carbon sits on the symmetry axis so its two "halves" are mirror-related, giving extra meso forms (1). Check: n=2n=2 symmetric 21+20=3\to 2^1 + 2^0 = 3 ✓ (tartaric acid).

(d) Specific rotation (3 marks) [α]=αobslc[\alpha] = \dfrac{\alpha_{obs}}{l\cdot c}. Only the (+)(+) form rotates (meso inactive). Let mass fraction of active form =f= f, so its concentration =0.20f= 0.20f g/mL. 1.20=12.0×1×(0.20f)1.20=2.4ff=0.50.1.20 = 12.0 \times 1 \times (0.20 f) \Rightarrow 1.20 = 2.4 f \Rightarrow f = 0.50. Mass fraction (+)(+)-form =0.50= 0.50 (50%). (3)


Question 2

(a) Stability ordering (6 marks) Increasing stability: CH3+<(CH3)2CH+<CH2=CH-CH2+(CH3)3C+<C6H5CH2+\text{CH}_3^+ < (\text{CH}_3)_2\text{CH}^+ < \text{CH}_2=CH\text{-}CH_2^+ \approx (\text{CH}_3)_3\text{C}^+ < \text{C}_6\text{H}_5\text{CH}_2^+ Reasoning: CH3+\text{CH}_3^+ has no stabilisation (nβ=0n_\beta=0). Isopropyl (nβ=6n_\beta=6) > methyl via hyperconjugation + +I+I. tert-Butyl (nβ=9n_\beta=9) most stabilised of the simple alkyls. Allyl is resonance-stabilised (+M, 2 equivalent structures) — comparable to/greater than tert-butyl. Benzyl has resonance delocalisation over the aromatic ring (multiple resonance structures) → most stable. (6) [accept allyl vs t-Bu either order with justification].

(b) Model fitting (8 marks) With nres=0n_{res}=0 for both, ΔE=anβ\Delta E = a\,n_\beta. Ethyl: 36=3a36 = 3a; t-butyl: 68=9a68 = 9a. (2) Least-tension: use both. From ethyl a=12a=12; from t-Bu a=68/9=7.56a = 68/9 = 7.56. Best linear fit through both (least squares, intercept 0): a=nβEnβ2=3(36)+9(68)9+81=108+61290=72090=8.0.a = \frac{\sum n_\beta E}{\sum n_\beta^2} = \frac{3(36)+9(68)}{9+81} = \frac{108+612}{90} = \frac{720}{90} = 8.0. So a=8.0a = 8.0 kcal/mol per β\beta-C–H. (3) Predict isopropyl (nβ=6n_\beta=6): ΔE=8.0×6=48\Delta E = 8.0\times6 = 48 kcal/mol. (2) Experiment =54= 54; error =5448=6= 54-48 = 6 kcal/mol (11%\approx 11\% underestimate). The purely additive nβn_\beta model ignores that hyperconjugation per bond is non-linear and neglects +I+I saturation; hence deviation. (1)

(c) Neopentyl rearrangement (6 marks) (CH3)3C-CH2+(\text{CH}_3)_3\text{C-CH}_2^+ (primary) → a methyl group migrates with its bonding pair from the quaternary carbon to the adjacent cationic carbon (1,2-methyl shift): (CH3)3C-CH+21,2-CH3 shift(CH3)2C+-CH2CH3(\text{CH}_3)_3\text{C-}\overset{+}{\text{CH}}_2 \xrightarrow{\text{1,2-CH}_3 \text{ shift}} (\text{CH}_3)_2\overset{+}{\text{C}}\text{-CH}_2\text{CH}_3 producing the tertiary tert-pentyl cation. (3) Classification: 1,2-methyl shift. (1) Driving force: primary → tertiary carbocation, large gain in stability (hyperconjugation + +I+I). (1) The methyl migrates with its electron pair because the reaction is heterolytic (curved arrow = 2 electrons); the σ C–CH₃ bonding pair moves to form the new bond, leaving the positive charge on the now-tertiary carbon. (Homolysis would give radicals, not observed here.) (1)


Question 3

(a) C₄H₈ isomers (8 marks) DoU =(24+28)/2=1= (2\cdot4+2-8)/2 = 1 → one ring OR one double bond. (1) Alkenes (chain/position/geometrical):

  1. but-1-ene CH2=CH-CH2-CH3\text{CH}_2=CH\text{-}CH_2\text{-}CH_3
  2. cis-but-2-ene (ZZ)
  3. trans-but-2-ene (EE)
  4. 2-methylprop-1-ene (isobutylene) Cyclic:
  5. cyclobutane
  6. methylcyclopropane (5, ½ each accept) Relationships: but-1-ene vs but-2-ene = position isomers; but-2-ene vs 2-methylpropene = chain; cis/trans-but-2-ene = geometrical (cis–trans); alkenes vs cycloalkanes = functional/ring–chain isomers. (2)

(b) DoU derivation (6 marks) Saturated acyclic CnH2n+2\text{C}_nH_{2n+2} is the reference (max H). Each degree of unsaturation (ring or π\pi-bond) removes 2 H. (2) For CnH2n\text{C}_nH_{2n}: missing H =(2n+2)2n=2= (2n+2)-2n = 2, so DoU =2/2=1= 2/2 = 1. (1) General: NN (trivalent, like C-analog but 3 bonds) adds capacity for +1 H each → +N+N; halogen XX (monovalent, like H) → X-X; O (divalent) inserts into a bond without changing H count → does not appear. (2) DoU=2C+2+NHX2.\text{DoU} = \frac{2C+2+N-H-X}{2}. (1)

(c) Code + application (6 marks)

def dou(C, H, N=0, X=0):
    return (2*C + 2 + N - H - X) // 2

(i) Benzene C6H6\text{C}_6H_6: (12+26)/2=4(12+2-6)/2 = 4 → 3 π\pi-bonds + 1 ring (aromatic). (2) (ii) Pyridine C5H5N\text{C}_5H_5N: (10+2+15)/2=4(10+2+1-5)/2 = 4 → ring + 3 π\pi (aromatic N-heterocycle). (2) (iii) Chloroacetic acid C2H3ClO2\text{C}_2H_3\text{ClO}_2: (4+231)/2=1(4+2-3-1)/2 = 1 → one π\pi-bond (the C=O). (2)


[
  {"claim":"Tartaric acid symmetric n=2 gives 3 stereoisomers",
   "code":"def cs(n,sym):\n    if not sym: return 2**n\n    return 2**(n-1)+ (2**(n//2-1) if n%2==0 else 2**((n-1)//2))\nresult = (cs(2,True)==3) and (cs(3,True)==6) and (cs(4,False)==16)"},
  {"claim":"Specific rotation mass fraction of active form is 0.50",
   "code":"f = symbols('f'); sol = solve(Eq(1.20, 12.0*1*(0.20*f)), f); result = abs(sol[0]-0.5) < 1e-9"},
  {"claim":"Least-squares slope a=8.0 and isopropyl prediction 48 kcal/mol",
   "code":"a = (3*36+9*68)/(9+81); result = (a==8.0) and (a*6==48.0)"},
  {"claim":"DoU values: benzene 4, pyridine 4, chloroacetic acid 1",
   "code":"def dou(C,H,N=0,X=0): return (2*C+2+N-H-X)//2\nresult = dou(6,6)==4 and dou(5,5,1)==4 and dou(2,3,0,1)==1"}
]