Equilibrium
Level 3 Paper (Production: Derivations & Explain-out-loud)
Time: 45 minutes Total Marks: 60
Answer all questions. Show every derivation step from first principles. State assumptions.
Q1. [10 marks] Starting from the law of mass action for the general gas-phase reaction derive the relationship from scratch. Clearly define and state the assumption(s) required. Then compute at 500 K given for the reaction (Use .)
Q2. [10 marks] (a) Derive Ostwald's dilution law for a weak monobasic acid of initial concentration and degree of dissociation , giving the exact expression for and the approximate form . State the approximation used and when it fails. [6] (b) A weak acid has . Using the approximation, find and the pH of a solution. [4]
Q3. [12 marks] (a) Derive the Henderson–Hasselbalch equation starting from the acid dissociation equilibrium. [5] (b) A buffer is made by mixing acetic acid and sodium acetate in . . Calculate the pH. [3] (c) Explain out loud (in words + equations) how this buffer resists pH change when a small amount of strong base is added. Recalculate the pH after adding NaOH. [4]
Q4. [10 marks] (a) Define the reaction quotient . State the three cases relating to and the direction the reaction shifts in each. [4] (b) For , at a given temperature. A vessel contains , , . Calculate and predict the direction of net reaction. [4] (c) Using Le Chatelier's principle, state and justify the effect on the equilibrium yield of of (i) increasing pressure, (ii) adding a catalyst. [2]
Q5. [10 marks] (a) Derive the expression for the pH of an aqueous solution of a salt of a weak acid and strong base (WA/SB), of concentration , in terms of , and . Show that . [6] (b) Calculate the pH of sodium acetate (). [4]
Q6. [8 marks] (a) Write the expression for and derive its molar solubility in pure water in terms of . [3] (b) . Find in pure water, then find in AgNO. Explain the common-ion effect using the numbers. [5]
Answer keyMark scheme & solutions
Q1 [10]
Derivation [6]: For an ideal gas, (1). So each partial pressure equals concentration × RT.
(1). Substitute : (2) , where = moles gaseous product − moles gaseous reactant (1). Assumption: ideal gas behaviour; only gaseous species counted in (1).
Numerical [4]: (1). (1). ; (1). (1).
Q2 [10]
(a) [6] . Initial , 0, 0; equilibrium (2). (2) — exact form. For weak acid (1): (1). Fails at high dilution / larger where not small.
(b) [4] (2). (1). (1).
Q3 [12]
(a) [5] , (1). (1). Take : (2). (1).
(b) [3] (1). (1) (1).
(c) [4] Added OH⁻ reacts with HA: , converting acid to conjugate base; ratio changes slightly, pH nearly stable (2). New: HA = , A⁻ = (1). (1).
Q4 [10]
(a) [4] = same mass-action ratio as but with current (non-equilibrium) concentrations (1). : forward shift (1); : at equilibrium (1); : reverse shift (1).
(b) [4] (3). ⇒ shifts forward (right) (1).
(c) [2] (i) ; increasing pressure shifts toward fewer gas moles → more (1). (ii) Catalyst speeds both directions equally → no change in equilibrium position/yield, only faster attainment (1).
Q5 [10]
(a) [6] Salt hydrolyses: , (2). Let : (1) ⇒ (1). (1). (1).
(b) [4] (1). (1) (1) (1).
Q6 [8]
(a) [3] ; (1). If solubility : (1) ⇒ (1).
(b) [5] Pure water: (2). In M AgNO₃: ; (2). Common-ion Ag⁺ suppresses dissolution — solubility falls ~6 orders of magnitude (1).
[
{"claim":"Q1 Kp = 2.37e-5","code":"Kc=Rational(4,100); R=0.0821; T=500; dn=-2; Kp=Kc*(R*T)**dn; result=abs(float(Kp)-2.37e-5)<1e-7"},
{"claim":"Q2 pH of 0.10M weak acid Ka=1.8e-5 is 2.87","code":"Ka=1.8e-5; C=0.10; alpha=(Ka/C)**0.5; H=C*alpha; import sympy; pH=-sympy.log(H,10); result=abs(float(pH)-2.87)<0.02"},
{"claim":"Q3b buffer pH 4.92","code":"import sympy; pKa=-sympy.log(1.8e-5,10); pH=pKa+sympy.log(Rational(30,20),10); result=abs(float(pH)-4.92)<0.02"},
{"claim":"Q5b sodium acetate pH 8.87","code":"import sympy; pKa=-sympy.log(1.8e-5,10); pH=7+pKa/2+sympy.log(0.10,10)/2; result=abs(float(pH)-8.87)<0.02"},
{"claim":"Q6 solubility Ag2CrO4 pure water 6.50e-5","code":"s=(1.1e-12/4)**(1/3); result=abs(s-6.50e-5)<1e-6"}
]