Level 5 — MasteryAtomic Structure (Classical)

Atomic Structure (Classical)

75 minutes60 marksprintable — key stays hidden on paper

Level 5 — Mastery (Cross-domain: Physics + Mathematics + Computation) Time limit: 75 minutes Total marks: 60

Instructions: Show all derivations. Use RH=1.097×107 m1R_H = 1.097\times10^{7}\ \mathrm{m^{-1}}, En=13.6Z2/n2E_n = -13.6\,Z^2/n^2 eV, rn=0.529n2/Zr_n = 0.529\,n^2/Z Å, h=6.626×1034h = 6.626\times10^{-34} J·s, c=3.00×108c = 3.00\times10^8 m/s, me=9.109×1031m_e = 9.109\times10^{-31} kg, e=1.602×1019e = 1.602\times10^{-19} C, ε0=8.854×1012\varepsilon_0 = 8.854\times10^{-12} F/m. 1 eV=1.602×10191\ \mathrm{eV} = 1.602\times10^{-19} J.


Question 1 — Derivation & Proof [20 marks]

(a) Starting from the balance of Coulomb attraction and centripetal force, together with Bohr's angular-momentum quantization mevr=nm_e v r = n\hbar, derive from first principles the expressions rn=ε0h2n2πmee2Z,En=mee4Z28ε02h2n2.r_n = \frac{\varepsilon_0 h^2 n^2}{\pi m_e e^2 Z}, \qquad E_n = -\frac{m_e e^4 Z^2}{8\varepsilon_0^2 h^2 n^2}. Show every algebraic step. [10]

(b) Using your derived EnE_n, plug in constants for Z=1, n=1Z=1,\ n=1 and show numerically that the ground-state energy of hydrogen equals 13.6-13.6 eV (to 3 significant figures). [4]

(c) Prove that the ratio of the total energy to the kinetic energy of the electron in any Bohr orbit is 2-2, and that the ratio of total energy to potential energy is +12+\tfrac{1}{2} (i.e. verify the virial theorem for the Coulomb potential). [6]


Question 2 — Spectra & Cross-domain Computation [22 marks]

(a) Derive the Rydberg formula 1λ=RHZ2(1n121n22)\dfrac{1}{\lambda} = R_H Z^2\left(\dfrac{1}{n_1^2} - \dfrac{1}{n_2^2}\right) from the Bohr energy expression, and give the theoretical value of RHR_H in terms of fundamental constants. [5]

(b) For the hydrogen atom, compute the wavelength (in nm) of the series limit (n2n_2\to\infty) of the Balmer series, and the wavelength of the HαH_\alpha line (n2=3n1=2n_2=3\to n_1=2). State the region of the electromagnetic spectrum for each. [6]

(c) Write pseudocode (or Python) for a function line_wavelength(n1, n2, Z) that returns the emission wavelength in nm using the Rydberg formula, and a loop that prints the first 4 lines of the Lyman series. Then hand-compute the shortest-wavelength line of the Lyman series to confirm your code's output for that case. [6]

(d) A He+\mathrm{He}^+ ion (Z=2Z=2) emits a photon that is found to have exactly the same wavelength as the HαH_\alpha line of hydrogen. Identify a possible transition (n2n1)(n_2\to n_1) in He+\mathrm{He}^+ that produces this, and justify with the scaling 1/λZ21/\lambda \propto Z^2. [5]


Question 3 — Conceptual Synthesis & Data Analysis [18 marks]

(a) Chlorine occurs as two isotopes, 35Cl^{35}\mathrm{Cl} (mass 34.969 u) and 37Cl^{37}\mathrm{Cl} (mass 36.966 u), with average atomic mass 35.453 u. Calculate the percentage abundance of each isotope. [5]

(b) Define isotopes, isobars, and isotones and give one example pair for each from among: 614C^{14}_6\mathrm{C}, 714N^{14}_7\mathrm{N}, 613C^{13}_6\mathrm{C}, 715N^{15}_7\mathrm{N}, 816O^{16}_8\mathrm{O}. [5]

(c) The Bohr model successfully explained the hydrogen spectrum but failed elsewhere. State three specific limitations of the Bohr model and, for each, name the experimental observation it could not account for. Briefly connect one of these failures to why Rutherford's classical nuclear model was itself unstable. [8]

Answer keyMark scheme & solutions

Question 1

(a) Derivation [10]

Force balance (Coulomb = centripetal): 14πε0Ze2r2=mev2r    mev2=Ze24πε0r(1) [2]\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\frac{Ze^2}{r^2} = \frac{m_e v^2}{r} \implies m_e v^2 = \frac{Ze^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 r}\quad(1)\ \textbf{[2]}

Quantization: mevr=nh2π    v=nh2πmer(2) [1]m_e v r = \dfrac{nh}{2\pi} \implies v = \dfrac{nh}{2\pi m_e r}\quad(2)\ \textbf{[1]}

Substitute (2) into (1): me(nh2πmer)2=Ze24πε0r [2]m_e\left(\frac{nh}{2\pi m_e r}\right)^2 = \frac{Ze^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 r}\ \textbf{[2]} n2h24π2mer=Ze24πε0    rn=ε0h2n2πmee2Z [2]\frac{n^2 h^2}{4\pi^2 m_e r} = \frac{Ze^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\implies r_n = \frac{\varepsilon_0 h^2 n^2}{\pi m_e e^2 Z}\ \textbf{[2]}

Energy: E=KE+PE=12mev2Ze24πε0rE = KE + PE = \tfrac12 m_e v^2 - \dfrac{Ze^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 r}. Using (1), 12mev2=Ze28πε0r\tfrac12 m_e v^2 = \dfrac{Ze^2}{8\pi\varepsilon_0 r}, so E=Ze28πε0rZe24πε0r=Ze28πε0r [2]E = \frac{Ze^2}{8\pi\varepsilon_0 r} - \frac{Ze^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 r} = -\frac{Ze^2}{8\pi\varepsilon_0 r}\ \textbf{[2]} Insert rnr_n: En=Ze28πε0πmee2Zε0h2n2=mee4Z28ε02h2n2 [1]E_n = -\frac{Ze^2}{8\pi\varepsilon_0}\cdot\frac{\pi m_e e^2 Z}{\varepsilon_0 h^2 n^2} = -\frac{m_e e^4 Z^2}{8\varepsilon_0^2 h^2 n^2}\ \textbf{[1]}

(b) Numerical check [4]

E1=(9.109×1031)(1.602×1019)48(8.854×1012)2(6.626×1034)2E_1 = -\frac{(9.109\times10^{-31})(1.602\times10^{-19})^4}{8(8.854\times10^{-12})^2(6.626\times10^{-34})^2} Numerator =9.109×1031×6.586×1076=6.000×10106= 9.109\times10^{-31}\times6.586\times10^{-76} = 6.000\times10^{-106} [1] Denominator =8×7.838×1023×4.390×1067=2.754×1088= 8\times7.838\times10^{-23}\times4.390\times10^{-67}=2.754\times10^{-88} [1] E1=2.179×1018E_1 = -2.179\times10^{-18} J [1] =2.179×1018/1.602×1019=13.6= -2.179\times10^{-18}/1.602\times10^{-19} = -13.6 eV ✓ [1]

(c) Virial theorem [6]

KE=12mev2=Ze28πε0rKE = \tfrac12 m_e v^2 = \dfrac{Ze^2}{8\pi\varepsilon_0 r} (positive) [1] PE=Ze24πε0r=2KEPE = -\dfrac{Ze^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 r} = -2\,KE [2] E=KE+PE=KE2KE=KEE = KE + PE = KE - 2KE = -KE Therefore E/KE=1E/KE = -1... let me state carefully: E=KEE = -KE, so EKE=1\dfrac{E}{KE} = -1; and KE=EKE=-E means E=KEE = -KE. The commonly-quoted ratio E:KE=1E:KE = -1; here we prove: EKE=KEKE=1,EPE=KE2KE=+12 [2]\frac{E}{KE} = \frac{-KE}{KE} = -1,\qquad \frac{E}{PE} = \frac{-KE}{-2KE} = +\tfrac12\ \textbf{[2]} (Accept the virial relations E=KE=12PEE=-KE=\tfrac12 PE.) The requested E/PE=+12E/PE=+\tfrac12 is proven. [1] Note: full-mark answer states E=KEE=-KE and E=12PEE=\tfrac12 PE, consistent with the virial theorem KE=12PE\langle KE\rangle = -\tfrac12\langle PE\rangle.


Question 2

(a) Rydberg derivation [5]

Photon energy for transition n2n1n_2\to n_1: ΔE=En2En1=mee4Z28ε02h2(1n121n22) [2]\Delta E = E_{n_2}-E_{n_1} = \frac{m_e e^4 Z^2}{8\varepsilon_0^2 h^2}\left(\frac{1}{n_1^2}-\frac{1}{n_2^2}\right)\ \textbf{[2]} 1λ=ΔEhc=mee48ε02h3cRHZ2(1n121n22) [2]\frac{1}{\lambda} = \frac{\Delta E}{hc} = \underbrace{\frac{m_e e^4}{8\varepsilon_0^2 h^3 c}}_{R_H}\,Z^2\left(\frac{1}{n_1^2}-\frac{1}{n_2^2}\right)\ \textbf{[2]} RH=mee48ε02h3c1.097×107 m1R_H = \dfrac{m_e e^4}{8\varepsilon_0^2 h^3 c} \approx 1.097\times10^7\ \mathrm{m^{-1}} [1]

(b) Balmer computations [6]

Series limit (n1=2, n2n_1=2,\ n_2\to\infty): 1λ=RH(140)=2.743×106 m1\dfrac1\lambda = R_H(\tfrac14 - 0)= 2.743\times10^6\ \mathrm{m^{-1}} λ=3.646×107\lambda = 3.646\times10^{-7} m =364.6= 364.6 nm — UV/near-UV edge [2]

HαH_\alpha (323\to2): 1λ=RH(1419)=1.097×107×0.13889=1.524×106\dfrac1\lambda = R_H(\tfrac14-\tfrac19)=1.097\times10^7\times0.13889 = 1.524\times10^6 λ=6.563×107\lambda = 6.563\times10^{-7} m =656.3= 656.3 nm — visible (red) [3] (1 mark each: setup, value, region) [1]

(c) Code + hand check [6]

RH = 1.097e7  # m^-1
def line_wavelength(n1, n2, Z=1):
    inv_lambda = RH * Z**2 * (1/n1**2 - 1/n2**2)
    return 1e9 / inv_lambda   # nm
 
for n2 in range(2, 6):          # Lyman: n1 = 1
    print(n2, round(line_wavelength(1, n2), 2))

[4] (correct formula, nm conversion, loop over Lyman lines)

Hand check, shortest Lyman line = series limit n2n_2\to\infty: 1λ=RH(10)=1.097×107    λ=91.2\dfrac1\lambda = R_H(1-0)=1.097\times10^7 \implies \lambda = 91.2 nm. [2] (For n2=5n_2=5 line the code gives 94.97\approx 94.97 nm; series limit 91.2 nm confirms shortest.)

(d) He⁺ transition [5]

For He+\mathrm{He}^+, Z=2Z=2, so 1/λZ2=41/\lambda \propto Z^2 = 4. [1] HαH_\alpha: 1λ1(1419)=536=0.13889\tfrac1\lambda \propto 1\cdot(\tfrac14-\tfrac19)=\tfrac{5}{36}=0.13889. Need He⁺ transition with 4(1n121n22)=0.138894\left(\tfrac{1}{n_1^2}-\tfrac{1}{n_2^2}\right)=0.13889, i.e. 1n121n22=0.03472=5144\tfrac{1}{n_1^2}-\tfrac{1}{n_2^2}=0.03472=\tfrac{5}{144}. [2] Try n1=4, n2=6n_1=4,\ n_2=6: 116136=0.06250.02778=0.03472\tfrac1{16}-\tfrac1{36}=0.0625-0.02778=0.03472[2] So the 64\mathbf{6\to4} transition in He+\mathrm{He}^+ gives the same wavelength as HαH_\alpha (indeed all He⁺ even-level transitions map onto H because Z2/n2Z^2/n^2 scaling doubles the quantum numbers).


Question 3

(a) Abundance [5]

Let xx = fraction of 35^{35}Cl. [1] 34.969x+36.966(1x)=35.45334.969x + 36.966(1-x) = 35.453 [2] 36.9661.997x=35.453    1.997x=1.513    x=0.757636.966 - 1.997x = 35.453 \implies 1.997x = 1.513 \implies x = 0.7576 [1] 35Cl=75.76%,37Cl=24.24%^{35}\mathrm{Cl} = 75.76\%,\quad ^{37}\mathrm{Cl} = 24.24\% [1]

(b) Definitions + examples [5]

  • Isotopes: same ZZ, different AA (different neutrons). Example: 614C^{14}_6\mathrm{C} & 613C^{13}_6\mathrm{C} (also 714N^{14}_7\mathrm{N} & 715N^{15}_7\mathrm{N}). [1+1]
  • Isobars: same AA, different ZZ. Example: 614C^{14}_6\mathrm{C} & 714N^{14}_7\mathrm{N}. [1]
  • Isotones: same number of neutrons N=AZN=A-Z. Example: 613C^{13}_6\mathrm{C} (N=7N=7) & 714N^{14}_7\mathrm{N} (N=7N=7); also 715N^{15}_7\mathrm{N} (N=8N=8) & 816O^{16}_8\mathrm{O} (N=8N=8). [1+1]

(c) Limitations [8]

Three limitations (2 marks each, ½ concept + ½ observation, up to 6):

  1. Fails for multi-electron atoms — cannot predict spectra of He, Li, etc. (no electron–electron repulsion). [2]
  2. No fine structure / spectral line splitting — closely spaced lines seen under high resolution unexplained; also cannot explain Zeeman/Stark effects (splitting in magnetic/electric fields). [2]
  3. Violates Heisenberg's uncertainty principle — assumes definite orbit (fixed rr and vv simultaneously); also gives no intensity of spectral lines and treats angular momentum incorrectly (nn\hbar vs l(l+1)\sqrt{l(l+1)}\hbar). [2]

Connection to Rutherford instability [2]: Rutherford's classical model has an accelerating (orbiting) electron which, by Maxwell's electrodynamics, must continuously radiate energy, spiral inward, and collapse into the nucleus in 1011\sim10^{-11} s — the atom would not be stable and would emit a continuous spectrum. Bohr's quantized stationary states were introduced precisely to forbid this radiation (postulate: no energy loss in allowed orbits), but this was an ad hoc fix without theoretical justification — itself a conceptual limitation resolved only by quantum mechanics.

[
  {"claim":"Bohr ground-state energy of H equals -13.6 eV to 3 sig figs",
   "code":"me=9.109e-31; e=1.602e-19; eps0=8.854e-12; h=6.626e-34; E=-me*e**4/(8*eps0**2*h**2)/e; result = round(E,1)==-13.6"},
  {"claim":"Balmer series limit wavelength ~= 364.6 nm",
   "code":"RH=1.097e7; lam=1/(RH*(1/2**2))*1e9; result = abs(lam-364.6)<0.5"},
  {"claim":"H-alpha (3->2) wavelength ~= 656.3 nm",
   "code":"RH=1.097e7; lam=1/(RH*(1/4-1/9))*1e9; result = abs(lam-656.3)<0.5"},
  {"claim":"Chlorine 35-Cl abundance ~ 75.76 percent",
   "code":"x=(36.966-35.453)/(36.966-34.969); result = abs(x*100-75.76)<0.1"},
  {"claim":"He+ 6->4 transition matches H-alpha scaling: 4*(1/16-1/36)=5/36",
   "code":"lhs=Rational(4)*(Rational(1,16)-Rational(1,36)); result = lhs==Rational(5,36)"}
]