Photosynthesis
Time limit: 60 minutes Total marks: 50 Instructions: Answer ALL questions. No hints provided. Apply your understanding to the novel scenarios described. Use chemical/word equations where appropriate.
Question 1 — Isotope tracing experiment (10 marks)
A researcher grows an aquatic plant in two separate experiments:
- Experiment A: the water () is labelled with the heavy oxygen isotope , while the contains only normal .
- Experiment B: the is labelled with , while the water contains only .
(a) State the overall balanced equation for photosynthesis, clearly showing the water molecules used. (2)
(b) In Experiment A, predict which product ( or the carbohydrate) will contain the label. Justify your answer with reference to a specific reaction. (3)
(c) In Experiment B, predict where the label will appear. Explain the pathway. (3)
(d) Using your answers, explain why the standard equation is sometimes written with six water molecules on the left and six on the right rather than being simplified. (2)
Question 2 — Interpreting an action/absorption spectrum (10 marks)
A student measures the rate of oxygen release from a leaf illuminated with equal-intensity monochromatic light at different wavelengths and obtains the following data:
| Wavelength (nm) | 430 | 500 | 550 | 670 | 700 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| release (arb. units) | 88 | 25 | 15 | 95 | 40 |
(a) Identify which two wavelength regions give the highest rates and relate this to the pigments present. (3)
(b) The measured rate at 500–550 nm is not zero, even though chlorophyll a absorbs poorly there. Give a reason. (2)
(c) Predict the shape of the graph if the same experiment were repeated using a mutant plant lacking all accessory (carotenoid and chlorophyll b) pigments. (3)
(d) Explain why an action spectrum and an absorption spectrum for the same leaf have a similar overall shape but are not identical. (2)
Question 3 — Deducing a metabolic pathway (10 marks)
A biochemist supplies illuminated chloroplasts with radiolabelled and stops the reaction after just 5 seconds. Almost all radioactivity is found in a single 3-carbon compound. When the experiment runs for 60 seconds, the label appears in many compounds including 5-carbon sugars.
(a) Name the 3-carbon compound labelled first and the enzyme responsible for its formation. (2)
(b) Explain why a 3-carbon compound, not a 6-carbon one, is the first stable product despite joining a 5-carbon acceptor. (3)
(c) The chloroplasts are then placed in darkness while supply continues. Predict what happens to the level of RuBP and of the 3-carbon compound. Explain. (3)
(d) State how many turns of the Calvin cycle and how many molecules of ATP and NADPH are required to produce one molecule of glucose. (2)
Question 4 — Comparing plant types in a novel environment (12 marks)
Three plants — a C3 grass, a C4 grass, and a CAM succulent — are grown together in a hot, dry, high-light desert with occasional rainfall.
(a) Explain, with reference to their biochemistry, why the C4 grass is expected to outperform the C3 grass in this environment during the day. (4)
(b) Describe how the CAM succulent avoids water loss while still fixing carbon, and identify the key difference between CAM and C4 spatial/temporal separation. (4)
(c) At dawn in cool, moist conditions early in the season, the C3 grass grows fastest of the three. Suggest why the C3 strategy can be advantageous here. (2)
(d) Explain how RuBisCO's dual function makes photorespiration more likely in the C3 grass at midday, and how the C4 grass minimises this. (2)
Question 5 — Quantitative limiting-factor analysis (8 marks)
An investigator measures photosynthetic rate (mm³ min⁻¹) in a pondweed under different conditions:
| Condition | Light intensity | (%) | Temp (°C) | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Low | 0.04 | 20 | 10 |
| 2 | High | 0.04 | 20 | 22 |
| 3 | High | 0.40 | 20 | 40 |
| 4 | High | 0.40 | 30 | 65 |
| 5 | High | 0.40 | 40 | 12 |
(a) Compare conditions 1 and 2 to identify the limiting factor at low light. Explain. (2)
(b) In condition 3, what has become the new limiting factor compared with condition 2? Justify. (3)
(c) Account for the sharp fall in rate between conditions 4 and 5. (3)
Answer keyMark scheme & solutions
Question 1 (10 marks)
(a) — 1 mark for correct reactants/products, 1 mark for showing 12 H₂O in (net 6 produced). (Simplified accepted for 1.)
(b) The will be labelled with (1). Reason: oxygen gas comes from the photolysis of water in the light-dependent reactions () (1), so oxygen atoms in O₂ originate from water, not CO₂ (1).
(c) The appears in the carbohydrate (and in the H₂O produced) (1). CO₂ is fixed in the Calvin cycle by RuBisCO; its oxygen atoms are incorporated into the 3-carbon acids/sugars (1), and some appear in the water released during the cycle — never in O₂ gas (1).
(d) Twelve water molecules are consumed (as the electron/H⁺ source in photolysis) and six are regenerated during carbon fixation/condensation (1); writing both sides shows water is both a reactant and a product, which the isotope experiment (b/c) confirms (1).
Question 2 (10 marks)
(a) Highest rates at ~430 nm (blue) and ~670 nm (red) (1); these correspond to the two absorption peaks of chlorophyll a (and b) (1); light absorbed here drives the light reactions and O₂ release most efficiently (1).
(b) Between 500–550 nm (green/yellow) the small non-zero rate is due to accessory pigments (carotenoids, chlorophyll b) absorbing some of this light and passing energy to the reaction centre (2). (Also acceptable: not all wavelengths perfectly monochromatic / scattering.)
(c) Rate at 430 and 670 nm would remain high (chlorophyll a still present) (1); the rate in the green–yellow (500–550) region would fall closer to zero because the accessory pigments harvesting that light are absent (1); overall the graph becomes more sharply "two-peaked" with a deeper trough (1).
(d) An absorption spectrum shows light absorbed by all pigments, some of which is lost as heat/fluorescence or not transferred efficiently, whereas the action spectrum shows only wavelengths that actually drive photosynthesis (1); hence they broadly match (both peak in blue/red) but differ in the green region and peak heights (1).
Question 3 (10 marks)
(a) Glycerate-3-phosphate (GP / 3-PGA) (1); enzyme RuBisCO (ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase) (1).
(b) CO₂ combines with the 5-C acceptor RuBP to form an unstable 6-carbon intermediate (1) which immediately splits into two 3-carbon molecules of GP (1); the 6-C compound is too unstable to accumulate, so the 3-C GP is the first stable product (1).
(c) In darkness, the light reactions stop, so ATP and NADPH are no longer made (1). GP cannot be reduced to triose phosphate, and RuBP cannot be regenerated (1). Therefore GP (the 3-C compound) rises/accumulates and RuBP falls (it keeps being consumed by continuing carboxylation but is not remade) (1).
(d) 6 turns of the cycle (1); requiring 18 ATP and 12 NADPH per glucose (1).
Question 4 (12 marks)
(a) At high light and temperature the C3 grass suffers high photorespiration because RuBisCO fixes O₂ when CO₂ is low (stomata partly closed in heat) (1). The C4 grass fixes CO₂ first with PEP carboxylase into a 4-C acid in mesophyll cells (1), which has no oxygenase activity and high CO₂ affinity (1); CO₂ is then concentrated in bundle-sheath cells so RuBisCO works efficiently with little photorespiration → higher net gain (1).
(b) The CAM succulent opens stomata at night to fix CO₂ (via PEP carboxylase) into malic acid stored in vacuoles, keeping stomata closed by day to reduce transpiration (1) for reducing water loss (1). By day the malate releases CO₂ for the Calvin cycle behind closed stomata (1). Key difference: CAM separates the two carboxylations in time (night vs day), whereas C4 separates them in space (mesophyll vs bundle-sheath cells) (1).
(c) In cool, moist conditions photorespiration is low and water is not limiting, so the extra ATP cost of the C4/CAM CO₂-concentrating mechanisms is not justified (1); the simpler, energetically cheaper C3 pathway then gives faster growth (1).
(d) RuBisCO can bind either CO₂ or O₂; at midday high temperature and closed stomata lower internal CO₂ and raise O₂, favouring the oxygenase reaction (photorespiration) in the C3 grass (1). The C4 grass keeps CO₂ concentration high around RuBisCO in bundle-sheath cells, so oxygenation is suppressed (1).
Question 5 (8 marks)
(a) Raising light (1→2) raises rate from 10 to 22 (1); therefore light was the limiting factor at low light — increasing it increased the rate while other factors stayed constant (1).
(b) Comparing condition 2→3, only CO₂ was increased (light already high) and rate rose 22→40, so CO₂ concentration was now limiting (1); because at high light the plant could use extra CO₂, showing light was no longer the limit (1); rate is now capped by CO₂ availability (1).
(c) Between 30 °C and 40 °C the rate collapses (65→12) (1); the high temperature denatures the enzymes (e.g. RuBisCO, ATP synthase) (1), so their active sites change shape and catalysis fails despite ample light and CO₂ (1).
[
{"claim":"Photosynthesis equation is balanced (12 H2O form): C=6, H=24, O=30 both sides",
"code":"C_l=6; H_l=24; O_l=2*6+12; C_r=6; H_r=12+2*6; O_r=6+6+2*6; result=(C_l==C_r) and (H_l==H_r) and (O_l==O_r)"},
{"claim":"Six turns of Calvin cycle needed per glucose",
"code":"carbons_per_turn=1; carbons_needed=6; turns=carbons_needed/carbons_per_turn; result=(turns==6)"},
{"claim":"18 ATP and 12 NADPH required per glucose (3 ATP + 2 NADPH per turn * 6 turns)",
"code":"turns=6; ATP=3*turns; NADPH=2*turns; result=(ATP==18) and (NADPH==12)"},
{"claim":"Light is limiting between conditions 1 and 2 (only light changed, rate rose)",
"code":"rate1=10; rate2=22; only_light_changed=True; result=only_light_changed and (rate2>rate1)"}
]