Level 4 — ApplicationDNA Structure & Replication

DNA Structure & Replication

60 minutes50 marksprintable — key stays hidden on paper

Chapter 3.3 — DNA Structure & Replication

Difficulty Level: 4 — Application (novel problems, no hints) Time Limit: 60 minutes Total Marks: 50


Question 1 — Chargaff & Structure [10 marks]

A biologist isolates double-stranded DNA from an unknown organism and finds that adenine makes up 28% of the total bases.

(a) Calculate the percentage of each of the other three bases (thymine, guanine, cytosine) in this double-stranded DNA. Show your reasoning. (4)

(b) A single strand of this same DNA is then analysed separately and found to contain 32% adenine. Explain why the single-strand value can differ from the whole-molecule value, and state what constraint (if any) Chargaff's rules place on a single strand. (3)

(c) The DNA of a second organism has a much higher melting temperature. Using base-pairing chemistry, predict which base pair is more abundant in the second organism and justify your prediction. (3)


Question 2 — Meselson–Stahl (Novel Variant) [12 marks]

A student repeats the Meselson–Stahl experiment. Bacteria are grown for many generations in heavy 15N^{15}\text{N} medium, then switched to light 14N^{14}\text{N} medium at generation 0. DNA is extracted and centrifuged in a density gradient.

(a) Predict the band pattern (heavy / intermediate / light and their relative proportions) seen after 1, 2, and 3 rounds of replication. (6)

(b) The student mistakenly believed replication was conservative. State the band pattern conservative replication would predict after 1 and 2 rounds, and explain how the actual result after 1 round distinguishes semi-conservative from conservative. (4)

(c) After many further generations in 14N^{14}\text{N}, is any heavy 15N^{15}\text{N} ever fully lost from the population of molecules? Explain. (2)


Question 3 — Replication Fork Reasoning [12 marks]

Below is one strand of a DNA template at a replication fork, written left to right:

5T A C G G A T C C G T A35'-\text{T A C G G A T C C G T A}-3'

(a) Write the sequence of the newly synthesised complementary strand, clearly labelling its 55' and 33' ends. (3)

(b) DNA polymerase can only add nucleotides to a 33' end. Given a replication fork moving left to right, state whether the strand synthesised on the template above is made continuously (leading) or discontinuously (lagging). Justify with reference to strand polarity. (4)

(c) Explain why primase is essential for the synthesis of both strands, and predict how many primers (approximately) are needed on the leading strand versus the lagging strand for one replication fork. (3)

(d) A mutation disables DNA ligase. State specifically which strand's product is affected and why. (2)


Question 4 — Telomeres & the End-Replication Problem [10 marks]

A cell line derived from normal human tissue divides about 50 times and then stops. A cancer-derived line from the same tissue divides indefinitely.

(a) Explain the molecular reason (linked to lagging-strand synthesis) why linear chromosomes shorten with each division. (4)

(b) Explain the difference in telomerase activity that most likely accounts for the two cell lines' behaviour. (3)

(c) Bacteria have circular chromosomes and do not use telomerase. Explain why they do not suffer the end-replication problem. (3)


Question 5 — Proofreading & Evidence [6 marks]

(a) DNA polymerase has a 353'\to5' exonuclease activity. Explain how this contributes to replication fidelity, and why this activity acts in the 353'\to5' direction while synthesis proceeds 535'\to3'. (3)

(b) In the Hershey–Chase experiment, protein was labelled with 35S^{35}\text{S} and DNA with 32P^{32}\text{P}. Explain why these two isotopes specifically, and state which label ended up inside the infected bacteria and what this proved. (3)


Answer keyMark scheme & solutions

Question 1 [10 marks]

(a) In dsDNA, Chargaff: A = T and G = C. (1) A = 28% ⇒ T = 28%. (1) A + T = 56%, so G + C = 100 − 56 = 44%. (1) G = C = 22% each. (1) Answer: T = 28%, G = 22%, C = 22%.

(b) Chargaff's rules (A=T, G=C) apply only to double-stranded DNA because pairing is between the two strands. (1) On a single strand there is no requirement that A equals T, so a value of 32% A is perfectly possible. (1) The single strand's A pairs with the T of the complementary strand, not with T on the same strand — so no equality constraint holds within one strand. (1)

(c) Higher melting temperature ⇒ more hydrogen bonds/stronger stacking. (1) G–C pairs have three H-bonds vs A–T's two, so more energy is needed to separate them. (1) Therefore the second organism has a higher G–C content (more G≡C pairs). (1)


Question 2 [12 marks]

(a) Semi-conservative: each new molecule = one old + one new strand. (grid below)

  • After 1 round: all molecules intermediate (¹⁵N/¹⁴N hybrid). → 100% intermediate. (2)
  • After 2 rounds: 4 molecules: 2 intermediate + 2 light → 50% intermediate, 50% light. (2)
  • After 3 rounds: 8 molecules: 2 intermediate + 6 light → 25% intermediate, 75% light (1:3). (2)

(b) Conservative prediction:

  • After 1 round: 50% heavy + 50% light (no intermediate). (1)
  • After 2 rounds: 25% heavy + 75% light. (1) The actual result after 1 round is a single intermediate band with no fully heavy or fully light DNA. (1) Conservative replication requires a heavy band to persist after 1 round; its absence, plus the single intermediate band, rules out conservative and supports semi-conservative. (1)

(c) The two original ¹⁵N strands are never destroyed — they are conserved intact within two molecules, becoming a vanishingly small fraction but never fully eliminated. (2) [So heavy strands persist, though intermediate density becomes undetectable.]


Question 3 [12 marks]

(a) Template: 5'-TACGGATCCGTA-3' Complement (antiparallel): 3'-ATGCCTAGGCAT-5', equivalently 5'-TACGGATCCGTA-3'...

Careful: complement of each base, written antiparallel: Template 5'-T A C G G A T C C G T A-3' New strand runs antiparallel: 3'-A T G C C T A G G C A T-5' (1 for correct bases, 1 for complement A↔T/G↔C, 1 for correct 5'/3' labelling). (3)

(b) The template is read 3'→5' by polymerase; synthesis is 5'→3'. The template above is written 5'→3' left-to-right. With the fork opening left→right, this template's 3' end is on the right, so polymerase moves right→left — against the fork direction ⇒ this strand is made discontinuously = lagging strand. (2 for conclusion, 2 for polarity justification.) (4)

(c) Primase lays down a short RNA primer providing a free 3'-OH, because DNA polymerase cannot initiate synthesis de novo — it can only extend an existing 3' end. (1) Leading strand needs ~1 primer (continuous). (1) Lagging strand needs many primers (one per Okazaki fragment). (1)

(d) The lagging strand product is affected. (1) Ligase seals the nicks between Okazaki fragments; without it the fragments remain unjoined, so the lagging strand stays fragmented. (1)


Question 4 [10 marks]

(a) On the lagging strand, synthesis requires an RNA primer at the extreme 3' end of the template. (1) When the terminal primer is removed, there is no upstream 3'-OH for polymerase to extend into that gap. (1) So the very end cannot be filled. (1) Each round the daughter strand is therefore shorter at the 5' end → chromosome shortens (end-replication problem). (1)

(b) Normal somatic cells have little/no telomerase, so telomeres shorten each division until a limit (senescence) after ~50 divisions (Hayflick limit). (1.5) Cancer cells reactivate telomerase, which extends telomeres and prevents critical shortening, allowing unlimited division. (1.5)

(c) Bacterial chromosomes are circular — there are no free ends. (1) Replication proceeds around the loop and the last primer's gap can be filled by extension from adjacent DNA and sealed by ligase. (1) Hence no terminal shortening occurs. (1)


Question 5 [6 marks]

(a) When polymerase inserts a mismatched base, the 3'→5' exonuclease removes the incorrect nucleotide from the newly made 3' end. (1) It must act 3'→5' because the error is at the growing 3' end, which is where the mismatch just occurred. (1) Removing it allows correct re-synthesis, greatly lowering the error rate (proofreading). (1)

(b) Sulfur (³⁵S) is present in protein (in cysteine/methionine) but essentially absent from DNA; phosphorus (³²P) is abundant in the DNA backbone but absent from protein. (1) This lets the two molecules be tracked separately. (1) The ³²P (DNA) entered the bacteria, while ³⁵S (protein) stayed outside, proving DNA is the genetic material. (1)


[
  {"claim":"Chargaff Q1: T=28, G=C=22 sum to 100 with A=28","code":"A=28; T=A; GC=100-A-T; G=GC/2; C=GC/2; result=(T==28 and G==22 and C==22 and A+T+G+C==100)"},
  {"claim":"Meselson-Stahl semi-conservative after 3 rounds: 2 intermediate, 6 light of 8","code":"gens=3; total=2**gens; inter=2; light=total-inter; result=(total==8 and inter==2 and light==6 and light/inter==3)"},
  {"claim":"After 2 rounds semi-conservative: 50% intermediate 50% light","code":"total=2**2; inter=2; light=total-inter; result=(inter/total==Rational(1,2) and light/total==Rational(1,2))"},
  {"claim":"Complement bases count: template TACGGATCCGTA has 12 bases and A-count of complement equals template T-count","code":"tem='TACGGATCCGTA'; comp={'A':'T','T':'A','G':'C','C':'G'}; new=''.join(comp[b] for b in tem); result=(len(tem)==12 and new.count('A')==tem.count('T'))"}
]