5.5.2 · Stock-Market › Portfolio Theory
Intuition The big picture
Jab aap do stocks hold karte hain, toh sirf yeh nahi dekhna ki har ek akele kitna uchhalti hai, balki dono saath mein kaise uchhalti hain — yeh bhi dekhna padta hai. Agar dono ek saath upar-neeche jaayein, toh dono hold karne se koi protection nahi milti. Agar ek zig kare aur doosri zag, toh dono ek doosre ko smooth out karti hain.
Covariance do assets ke saath milke move karne ki direction aur raw size measure karta hai.
Correlation covariance ko ==re-scale karke − 1 aur + 1 ke beech laata hai== taaki kisi bhi pair ke saath compare kar sako.
Yahi diversification ka engine hai — yahi poori wajah hai ki ek portfolio apne parts se kam risky ho sakta hai.
Intuition Feynman-style motivation
Variance batata hai ki ek stock kitna uchhal-kudh karta hai. Lekin ek portfolio ka risk pairs par depend karta hai. Do calm-dikhne wale stocks jo hamesha saath move karte hain ek wild portfolio bana sakte hain; do jumpy stocks jo opposite direction mein move karte hain ek calm portfolio bana sakte hain. Covariance/correlation woh missing ingredient hai jo "har stock ka risk" ko "poori basket ka risk" mein convert karta hai.
Do random returns X aur Y ke liye, covariance hai unke apne means se deviations ka average product :
Cov ( X , Y ) = E [ ( X − μ X ) ( Y − μ Y ) ]
jahaan μ X = E [ X ] , μ Y = E [ Y ] .
Positive → dono apne means se ek saath upar/neeche jaate hain.
Negative → jab ek apne mean se upar hota hai, doosra neeche jaata hai.
Zero → koi linear co-movement nahi.
Yeh idea se shuru karo ki "kya deviations ka sign agree karta hai?"
X ka apne centre se deviation: d X = X − μ X .
Y ka deviation: d Y = Y − μ Y .
Inhe multiply karo. Agar dono positive ya dono negative hain, toh d X d Y > 0 . Agar sign disagree kare, toh d X d Y < 0 . Toh product ka sign literally record karta hai "same direction ya opposite."
Tendency summarise karne ke liye saare outcomes pe average lo:
Cov ( X , Y ) = E [ d X d Y ] .
Sample version (n historical data points se), jo aap actually compute karte hain:
Cov ( X , Y ) = n − 1 1 ∑ i = 1 n ( x i − x ˉ ) ( y i − y ˉ )
n − 1 kyun? Humne data ko do baar use kiya — ek baar x ˉ estimate karne ke liye, ek baar deviations ke liye — toh humne ek degree of freedom "use up" kar liya; n − 1 se divide karna resulting downward bias ko correct karta hai.
Intuition Woh problem jo covariance chhod jaata hai
Covariance ki value returns ke units/scale par depend karti hai. 0.003 ka covariance — kya yeh bada hai? Tum nahi bata sakte, kyunki yeh "dono kitna saath move karte hain" aur "har ek kitna volatile hai" ko mix kar deta hai. Hum ek pure co-movement score chahte hain jisme se scale hata diya gaya ho.
Definition Correlation (Pearson)
ρ X Y = σ X σ Y Cov ( X , Y )
jahaan σ X = Var ( X ) , σ Y = Var ( Y ) . Yeh dimensionless hai aur hamesha [ − 1 , + 1 ] mein rehta hai.
Standard deviations se divide karo taaki standardised variables milein Z X = ( X − μ X ) / σ X (mean 0, variance 1). Tab ρ X Y = E [ Z X Z Y ] .
Yeh hamesha-nonnegative quantity consider karo:
E [ ( Z X − Z Y ) 2 ] ≥ 0.
Expand karo: E [ Z X 2 ] − 2 E [ Z X Z Y ] + E [ Z Y 2 ] = 1 − 2 ρ + 1 ≥ 0 ⇒ ρ ≤ 1.
Similarly E [( Z X + Z Y ) 2 ] ≥ 0 se ρ ≥ − 1 milta hai. Isliye − 1 ≤ ρ ≤ 1 . (Yeh Cauchy–Schwarz inequality ka disguised form hai.)
Worked example 1 — Raw data se Covariance
Do stocks, 3 periods. Returns (%): X = [ 2 , 4 , 6 ] , Y = [ 5 , 3 , 1 ] .
x ˉ = ( 2 + 4 + 6 ) /3 = 4 . Kyun? Deviations se pehle centre chahiye.
y ˉ = ( 5 + 3 + 1 ) /3 = 3 .
Deviations: X : [ − 2 , 0 , 2 ] , Y : [ 2 , 0 , − 2 ] .
Products: ( − 2 ) ( 2 ) = − 4 , ( 0 ) ( 0 ) = 0 , ( 2 ) ( − 2 ) = − 4 . Sum = − 8 .
Cov = n − 1 − 8 = 2 − 8 = − 4 . n − 1 = 2 kyun? Sample estimate hai.
Negative → dono opposite direction mein move karte hain — diversification ke liye great.
Worked example 2 — Ise correlation mein convert karo
Same data. Var ( X ) = 2 ( − 2 ) 2 + 0 2 + 2 2 = 2 8 = 4 ⇒ σ X = 2 . Symmetry se σ Y = 2 .
ρ = σ X σ Y Cov = 2 ⋅ 2 − 4 = − 1.
Exactly − 1 kyun? Y ek perfect straight-line decreasing function hai X ka (y = − x + const ), toh co-movement perfectly negative hai.
Worked example 3 — Diversification payoff
σ A = σ B = 20% , equal weights w = 0.5 .
Agar ρ = + 1 : σ P 2 = 0.25 ( 0.04 ) + 0.25 ( 0.04 ) + 2 ( 0.25 ) ( 1 ) ( 0.04 ) = 0.04 ⇒ σ P = 20% . Koi benefit nahi.
Agar ρ = 0 : σ P 2 = 0.01 + 0.01 + 0 = 0.02 ⇒ σ P = 14.1% . Risk drop karta hai.
Agar ρ = − 1 : σ P 2 = 0.01 + 0.01 − 0.02 = 0 ⇒ σ P = 0% . Risk khatam!
Yeh step kyun important hai: yeh dikhata hai ki correlation, individual risks nahi, diversification gain control karta hai.
Common mistake "High covariance matlab strong relationship."
Kyun sahi lagta hai: bada number sunne mein stronger link lagta hai. Catch: covariance units/volatility se scale hota hai, toh ek bahut bada covariance do bahut volatile-lekin-weakly-related stocks se aa sakta hai. Fix: standardise karo → strength judge karne ke liye correlation use karo; covariance sirf portfolio-variance arithmetic ke liye use karo.
Common mistake "Correlation of 0 matlab assets independent hain."
Kyun sahi lagta hai: independent cheezein "saath move nahi karni chahiye." Catch: ρ = 0 sirf linear relationship ko khatam karta hai. Ek U-shaped (nonlinear) dependence ka ρ = 0 ho sakta hai phir bhi fully dependent ho. Fix: yaad rakho ρ sirf linear co-movement measure karta hai.
Common mistake "Correlation 1 se exceed kar sakta hai agar stocks super linked hain."
Kyun sahi lagta hai: stronger = bada number. Catch: Cauchy–Schwarz bound prove karta hai ki ∣ ρ ∣ ≤ 1 . Agar aap ρ = 1.3 compute karo, toh arithmetic error hai. Fix: recheck karo; ± 1 ceiling/floor hai.
Common mistake Sample ke liye covariance mein
n se divide karna instead of n − 1 .
Kyun sahi lagta hai: "average = count se divide karo." Catch: aapne mean usi data se estimate kiya, jisse estimate low-biased ho jaata hai. Fix: samples ke liye n − 1 use karo (Bessel's correction); n sirf full population ke liye.
Recall Ek 12-saal ke bachche ko explain karo (Feynman)
Do doston ko see-saw par imagine karo. Covariance poochtha hai: jab ek upar jaata hai, kya doosra bhi upar jaata hai, ya neeche? Positive number = dono saath upar jaate hain; negative = ek upar, doosra neeche. Lekin covariance mein strange units hote hain, toh yeh kehna mushkil hai ki yeh "bahut zyada" hai ya nahi. Correlation wahi idea hai lekin fairly score kiya gaya − 1 se + 1 tak: + 1 = perfect same-direction team, − 1 = perfect opposite see-saw, 0 = koi pattern nahi. Investing mein, aap aise doston chahte ho jo tab zig kare jab baaki zag kare — kyunki jab ek stock drop kare, doosra aapki basket ko wapas utha le.
"Co-VARY = kya woh VARY karte hain saath mein? Correlation = SCALED score (−1 to +1)."
Aur diversification ke liye: "Rho low, risk low."
Covariance kya measure karta hai? Do variables ke means se deviations ka average product — unke co-movement ki direction aur raw magnitude.
Covariance ki definition formula? Cov ( X , Y ) = E [( X − μ X ) ( Y − μ Y )] .
Covariance ka computational form? Cov ( X , Y ) = E [ X Y ] − μ X μ Y .
Correlation ko covariance se kaise define karte hain? ρ X Y = Cov ( X , Y ) / ( σ X σ Y ) .
Correlation coefficient ki range? − 1 ≤ ρ ≤ + 1 .
σ X σ Y se divide kyun karte hain?Units/scale remove karne ke liye, jo ek dimensionless, comparable strength score deta hai jo ± 1 se bounded ho.
Kya ρ = 0 independence imply karta hai? Nahi — yeh sirf linear relationship ko rule out karta hai; nonlinear dependence phir bhi exist kar sakti hai.
Two-asset portfolio variance formula? σ P 2 = w A 2 σ A 2 + w B 2 σ B 2 + 2 w A w B ρ A B σ A σ B .
Sabse zyada diversification benefit kaunsa correlation deta hai? Sabse zyada negative (ρ = − 1 portfolio variance ko 0 tak le ja sakta hai).
Sample covariance mein n − 1 kyun use karte hain? Bessel's correction — mean data se estimate kiya gaya tha, toh ek degree of freedom lost ho jaata hai; downward bias correct karta hai.
∣ ρ ∣ ≤ 1 prove karne wali inequality?Cauchy–Schwarz, standardised variables ke saath E [( Z X ± Z Y ) 2 ] ≥ 0 ke zariye.
Variance and Standard Deviation — building blocks σ X , σ Y .
Diversification — negative correlation risk kyun reduce karta hai.
Portfolio Variance — jahaan covariance directly enter karta hai.
Efficient Frontier — correlation frontier ki curve ko shape karta hai.
Beta and CAPM — beta = Cov ( R i , R m ) / Var ( R m ) .
Cauchy–Schwarz Inequality — woh math jo ρ ko bound karta hai.
Variance risk of one stock
Downward bias / lost degree of freedom