4.7.1 · Stock-Market › Risk & Money Management
Intuition Ek saans mein core idea
Tum trades lose karoge. Yeh koi bug nahi hai — trading ka yeh ek feature hai. 1–2% rule kehta hai:
kisi bhi single trade mein, apna loss apne total trading capital ke 1–2% se zyada mat hone do.
Isse koi bhi single loss survivable ban jaata hai aur tum game mein itne lambe time tak rehte ho ki tumhara edge kaam kar sake.
Definition Risk per trade
Risk per trade = wo paisa jo tum lose karte ho agar trade galat ho jaaye — yaani agar price tumhara stop-loss hit kar le.
Yeh NAHI hai wo paisa jo tum trade mein lagate ho (woh position size / capital deployed hai).
Risk = (entry price − stop price) × (number of shares).
Yeh subtle trap hai: do traders dono "₹1,00,000 ki stock khareed sakte hain" lekin unka risk bilkul alag ho sakta hai, kyunki unke stop-losses alag distances par hain.
Losses tum par asymmetrically compound hote hain. Agar tum 50% lose karo, toh recover karne ke liye +50% nahi chahiye — +100% chahiye. Toh goal hai: kabhi itna bada loss mat lo ki compounding cripple ho jaaye.
Maano capital C hai, aur tumhara loss fixed fraction r (tumhara risk per trade) hai, n consecutive losing trades par. n losses ke baad capital:
C n = C ( 1 − r ) n
Yeh form kyun? Har loss remaining capital ko ( 1 − r ) se multiply karta hai — losses multiplicatively stack hote hain, additively nahi.
Ab pooch: 10 losses ki buri streak ke baad, kitna bachega?
C C 10 = ( 1 − r ) 10
r (risk/trade)
10 losses ke baad capital bacha
1%
( 0.99 ) 10 ≈ 90.4%
2%
( 0.98 ) 10 ≈ 81.7%
10%
( 0.90 ) 10 ≈ 34.9%
25%
( 0.75 ) 10 ≈ 5.6%
1–2% kyun jeet-ta hai: ek brutal 10-loss streak bhi tumhe barely dent karti hai (~18% max). 25% par, das losses wipe out kar deti hain. Chota risk survival time khareedta hai tumhare edge ke liye.
10% lose karo → chahiye 0.90 0.10 = 11.1% gain (mild).
50% lose karo → chahiye 0.50 0.50 = 100% gain (brutal).
Chota per-trade risk drawdowns ko chota rakhta hai, toh recovery easy rehti hai.
Worked example Example 1 — basic sizing
Capital C = ₹5 , 00 , 000 . Risk r = 1% . Entry P e = ₹200 , stop P s = ₹190 .
Step 1: Risk amount R = 0.01 × 5 , 00 , 000 = ₹5 , 000 .
Kyun? Yeh woh max hai jo tum apne aap ko yahan lose karne dete ho.
Step 2: Stop distance = ∣200 − 190∣ = ₹10 per share.
Kyun? Yeh tumhara per share loss hai agar trade fail ho.
Step 3: Q = 5000/10 = 500 shares.
Kyun? 500 × ₹10 = ₹5000 = R . ✓
Capital deployed = 500 × 200 = ₹1 , 00 , 000 (account ka 20%, lekin risk sirf 1% hai).
Worked example Example 2 — tighter stop = bigger position
Wahi C = ₹5 , 00 , 000 , r = 1% , entry ₹200 lekin stop ₹198 par (tight).
R = ₹5000 ; stop distance = ₹2 .
Q = 5000/2 = 2500 shares. Deployed = ₹5 , 00 , 000 (poora account!).
Bigger kyun? Tighter stop → har share kam risk karta hai → same ₹5000 risk ke liye tum zyada shares hold kar sakte ho.
Dhyan rakho: deployed capital badh gaya; tum risk limits se pehle position-size ya margin limits hit kar sakte ho. Chote allowed number se cap karo.
Worked example Example 3 — volatile stock par 2%
C = ₹2 , 00 , 000 , r = 2% , entry ₹500, stop ₹460.
R = 0.02 × 2 , 00 , 000 = ₹4000 .
Stop distance = ₹40 .
Q = 4000/40 = 100 shares. Deployed = ₹50 , 000 .
Yahan 2% kyun? Higher-conviction setup; lekin volatile stocks ko wide stops chahiye, jo Q shrink kar deta hai — rule auto-adjust karta hai size down risky stops ke liye. Yehi toh khoobsurti hai.
Common mistake "Risk = wo paisa jo maine invest kiya"
Sahi kyun lagta hai: agar tumne ₹1,00,000 laaye aur stock theoretically zero ho sakti hai, toh ₹1,00,000 hi max loss hai.
Fix: practice mein tum stop-loss par exit karte ho, ₹0 par nahi. Real risk = shares × stop distance, jo usually capital deployed ka ek tiny slice hota hai. "Invested amount" se sizing karna tumhe bahut kam size dilwata hai, ya worse, koi stop hi nahi hota.
Common mistake "Main stop widen kar lunga taaki stopped out na ho jaaun"
Sahi kyun lagta hai: wider stop = fewer premature exits = safer lagta hai.
Fix: risk 1% rakhne ke liye, wider stop position ko chota force karta hai. Agar stop widen karo aur same shares rakho, tumhara risk silently 3–4% jump kar jaata hai. Hamesha Q = R / distance re-solve karo.
Common mistake "Ek great trade — is baar 20% risk karta hoon"
Sahi kyun lagta hai: high conviction; bada win deserve lagta hai.
Fix: tum winners aur losers mein advance mein fark nahi kar sakte. Ek 20% loss ko recover karne ke liye 25% gain chahiye; unki streak account khatam kar deti hai (table dekho). Edge sirf bahut saare trades mein pay karta hai — tumhe unhe trade karne ke liye survive karna hoga.
Recall Feynman: 12-saal ke bacche ko samjhao
Socho tumhare paas 100 gold coins hain aur tum ek betting game khel rahe ho jisme tum kaafi achhe ho lekin perfect nahi. Agar tum har round mein apne almost saare coins lagate ho, toh ek unlucky round mein tum broke ho jaate ho — game over. Toh uski jagah tum sirf 1 ya 2 coins per round lagate ho. Even agar tum 10 baar haaro, tumhare paas abhi bhi ~80 coins bache hain aur tum tab tak khelna jaari rakh sakte ho jab tak tumhari skill jeette nahi. 1–2% rule bas yahi hai: "itna chota bet lagao ki buri streak tumhe game se bahar na kar sake."
"Risk small, live long — 1 to 2, that's all you throw."
Aur sizing ke liye: R.S.D. = Risk ÷ Stop Distance = Shares.
Kya "risk per trade" invested money hai ya stop par lost money? Kyun?
Risk amount se shares formula derive karo.
50% loss ko recover karne ke liye 100% gain kyun chahiye?
Tighter stop — position size upar jaata hai ya neeche? Kyun?
"Risk per trade" kya measure karta hai? Wo paisa jo tum lose karte ho agar price stop-loss hit kare, = shares × stop-distance — capital deployed NAHI.
1–2% rule state karo. Ek single trade par total trading capital ka 1–2% se zyada kabhi risk mat karo.
Rule se position size ka formula? Q = (r·C) / |P_e − P_s|, jahan r risk fraction hai, C capital, P_e entry, P_s stop.
Risk amount ko stop distance se kyun divide karo? Kyunki shares × stop-distance = loss if stopped out; use allowed risk ke equal karne se share count milta hai.
2% risk par 10 losses ke baad bacha capital? (0.98)^10 ≈ 81.7%.
Fraction L ka loss recover karne ke liye chahiye gain? g = L/(1−L); e.g. 50% loss ke liye 100% gain chahiye.
Agar stop widen karo lekin risk 1% rakho, size ka kya hoga? Position size shrink hoti hai (kam shares) kyunki ab har share zyada risk karta hai.
25% risk per trade fatal kyun hai? (0.75)^10 ≈ 5.6% — 10-loss streak account almost wipe kar deti hai.
Stop-Loss Placement — P s provide karta hai jo stop distance fix karta hai.
Position Sizing — Q = R / distance ka direct application.
Risk-Reward Ratio — per-trade risk ke saath pair hota hai expectancy define karne ke liye.
Drawdown and Recovery — asymmetry jo chote risk ko justify karti hai.
Kelly Criterion — ek formal optimum; 1–2% ek safe "fractional Kelly" hai.
Trading Psychology — chota risk emotions (aur revenge trades) ko control mein rakhta hai.
Q equals rC over stop distance
entry minus stop times shares
Position size / capital deployed
Multiplicative loss model
Drawdown recovery asymmetry