Exercises — Finite element method — nodes, elements, stiffness matrix
3.6.18 · D4· Physics › Spacecraft Structures & Systems Engineering › Finite element method — nodes, elements, stiffness matrix
Yeh page parent topic ke liye ek self-test ladder hai. Har problem mein sirf wohi ideas use hoti hain jo wahan build ki gayi hain: 1D bar element stiffness , shape functions, assembly, aur boundary conditions. Kuch bhi naya assume nahi kiya gaya — agar koi symbol aata hai, toh woh parent mein define kiya gaya tha.
Poore note mein, ek bar element sirf axial displacement carry karta hai: degree of freedom (DOF) per node. Parent se reuse hone wale symbols:
- = Young's modulus (material ki stiffness, pascals mein).
- = cross-section area.
- = element length.
- = ek bar ki "spring constant". Units: force / length (N/m).
- = node ka axial displacement. = node par lagaya gaya axial force.

Upar ka figure hamare reference structure hai jo zyaadatar problems mein use hoga: numbered nodes ke beech bars (springs) ki ek chain, jisme sabse baaya node wall se pin kiya gaya hai.
Level 1 — Recognition
Problem 1.1
Ek single bar ke liye element stiffness matrix likho jisme (aluminium), , ho. ki numeric value do.
Recall Solution 1.1
. Numerator: N. m se divide karo: Toh
Problem 1.2
Ek -node, -bar structure ko assemble karke yeh mila hai: Kaun sa node do elements se connect hota hai, aur sirf matrix padhke tum yeh kaise jaante ho?
Recall Solution 1.2
Diagonal entry count karta hai ki node par kitni total stiffness khinchti hai. Nodes aur ka diagonal hai (ek-ek bar); node ka diagonal hai (do bars add up hote hain). Toh node 2 dono elements se connect hota hai. Off-diagonal type ke zeros yeh bhi batate hain ki node aur node directly connected nahi hain (unke beech koi bar nahi).
Level 2 — Application
Problem 2.1
Ek single aluminium bar ( N/m, Problem 1.1 se) node par fixed hai aur node par N se khaincha ja raha hai. aur stress nikalo agar ho.
Recall Solution 2.1
Fixed node matlab . Sirf free DOF (node ) rakho: Strain (parent Step 2, ke saath): . Stress (Hooke, parent Step 3): Pa MPa. Cross-check: Pa. ✓ Dekho stress & strain.
Problem 2.2
Do identical bars series mein, har ek , nodes ––. Node fixed, load node par. Reduced system reproduce karo aur solve karo.
Recall Solution 2.2
Global matrix se row/column (fixed) delete karo: Row 1: . Row 2: , aur . Physical check: series mein do springs free end par double stretch karte hain. ✓
Level 3 — Analysis
Problem 3.1
Do bars series mein lekin alag stiffnesses ke saath: element A () nodes – ke beech, element B () nodes – ke beech. Node fixed, load node par. Assemble karo, phir solve karo.
Recall Solution 3.1
Element A DOFs (1,2) par, element B DOFs (2,3) par. Node ko dono diagonals milte hain: Reduce karo (node 1 drop karo): Row 1: . Row 2: . Substitute karo: Yahi series-spring rule hai: total flexibility = flexibilities ka sum. Aur . Sanity check: agar , toh , — Problem 2.2 se match karta hai. ✓
Problem 3.2
Dikhao ki single free-free bar ka un-reduced singular hai aur zero-determinant ko physically interpret karo.
Recall Solution 3.2
Zero determinant matlab ka koi inverse nahi: ka ya toh koi solution nahi ya infinitely many hain. Physically, koi support nahi hone par, dono nodes ko same amount se slide karna () zero strain produce karta hai () aur isliye zero force — yeh ek rigid-body translation hai jisme energy nahi lagti. Vector null-space direction hai. Boundary conditions exactly isi mode ko khatam karne ke liye exist karti hain (parent ka doosra [!mistake]).
Level 4 — Synthesis
Problem 4.1
Ek stepped rocket strut: bar A (, , ) phir bar B (, , ), GPa, series mein, nodes ––. Node fixed, N node par. , , aur har bar mein stress nikalo. Kaun sa bar zyada stressed hai?
Recall Solution 4.1
N/m. N/m. Problem 3.1 ke results use karo: m. . m. Bar A mein stress: , Pa MPa. Bar B mein stress: , Pa MPa. se cross-check: dono mein same internal force N flow karta hai (series). Bar A: Pa ✓. Bar B: Pa ✓. Bar B zyada stressed hai — patalee wali section. Isliye cutouts aur thin walls design drive karte hain; dekho buckling.
Problem 4.2
Ek single free-free bar of mass ke liye — isko ek element ki tarah discretise karo jisme har node par lumped mass ho. Bina poori modal machinery ke, singular stiffness se argue karo ki free-free bar mein zero-frequency (rigid-body) mode kyun hota hai, phir batao ki ek free unconstrained 3D structure mein kitne rigid-body modes hote hain.
Recall Solution 4.2
Natural frequency satisfy karti hai (dekho modal analysis). Rigid-translation vector deta hai (Problem 3.2 ke null space se), isliye , jo force karta hai . Zero-frequency mode = motion jisme koi elastic restoring force nahi = rigid-body mode. Free 3D space mein ek unconstrained body mein 6 rigid-body modes hote hain: 3 translations + 3 rotations. Ek supported structure ka valid analysis boundary conditions ke zariye inhe sab remove karta hai.
Level 5 — Mastery
Problem 5.1
Wall se ek single free node tak teen bars ek parallel bundle ki tarah arranged hain: nodes sab wall se fixed hain () aur har ek apne bar ke zariye ek common free node se connected hai, stiffnesses same axis ke along act kar rahi hain. Node par load lagaya gaya hai. Reduced equation assemble karo aur nikalo. Phir ke liye evaluate karo.
Recall Solution 5.1
Har bar shared free node ke diagonal mein contribute karta hai (teeno node ko khinchte hain). Fixed nodes drop out ho jaate hain. Single free DOF: Parallel springs ki stiffnesses add hoti hain — compare karo Problem 3.1 ke series result se jisme flexibilities add hui thi. ke liye: — bundle ek bar se teen guna stiff hai, isliye teen guna kam deflect hoti hai.
Problem 5.2
Convergence reasoning. Ek tapered bar (area linearly shrink ho raha hai length ke over) ko ek constant-area bar se model kiya gaya hai jiska area hai (average). End load ke under exact tip displacement hai: One-element FEM estimate aur uska percent error compute karo. Phir batao ki h-refinement kya karega.
Recall Solution 5.2
One-element model: , toh Ruko — like for like compare karo ko unit maanke. FEM coefficient ; exact coefficient . Percent error . Yeh bahut bada hai: ek single average-area element ek strong taper ko badly mis-model karta hai kyunki hamara linear shape function constant strain force karta hai, lekin ek tapered bar mein strain patalee end ki taraf badhti hai. h-refinement (bahut chhote bars mein split karna, har ek ka area almost constant) har element ki constant-strain assumption ko locally valid banata hai; summed displacement par converge karta hai. Dekho numerical methods aur, temperature-driven area/property changes ke liye, thermal analysis.
Recall Quick self-quiz
Single bar stiffness barabar hoti hai? ::: Assembled ka kisi node par diagonal entry kya batata hai? ::: wahan milne wali bars ki total stiffness (number/strength) Un-constrained singular kyun hoti hai? ::: rigid-body motion zero strain energy cost karti hai → zero-determinant null space Series springs combine hoti hain add karke? ::: flexibilities () Parallel springs combine hoti hain add karke? ::: stiffnesses () Free 3D body mein kitne rigid-body modes hote hain? ::: 6 (3 translations + 3 rotations) Linear bar element sirf kaisa strain represent kar sakta hai? ::: constant strain