3.5.43 · Physics › Guidance, Navigation & Control (GNC)
Ek feedback loop tab unstable ho jaata hai jab returned signal khud ko reinforce karta hai instead of die out karne ke. Woh magic point − 1 exactly wahan hai jahan open-loop signal wapas aata hai sign flip hokar aur same size mein — perfect self-reinforcement. Nyquist plot bas loop ki response ka ek map hai har frequency par , aur hum poochhte hain: kitni baar, aur kis direction mein, woh map danger point − 1 ke around wrap karta hai? Woh winding number humein stability batata hai bina roots solve kiye.
Definition Closed-loop stability
Unity-feedback system ke liye jisme open-loop transfer function L ( s ) = G ( s ) H ( s ) hai, closed-loop transfer function hai
T ( s ) = 1 + L ( s ) G ( s ) .
Closed-loop poles woh ==zeros of 1 + L ( s ) == hain (characteristic equation 1 + L ( s ) = 0 ke roots). System stable hai iff koi bhi RHP mein nahi hai (right-half plane).
Definition Nyquist criterion (encirclement form)
Maano
P = ==open-loop poles of L ( s ) in the RHP== ka number,
N = Nyquist plot of L ( j ω ) dwara ==point − 1 ke clockwise encirclements== ka number,
Z = closed-loop poles in the RHP ka number.
Toh
Z = N + P
Closed-loop system stable hai iff Z = 0 , yaani iff N = − P (plot ko − 1 ko exactly P baar counter-clockwise encircle karna chahiye).
Characteristic equation hai 1 + L ( s ) = 0 , yaani L ( s ) = − 1 . Toh ek closed-loop pole wahan hota hai jahan open-loop L ka value − 1 hota hai. Yeh study karna ki L kaise behave karta hai − 1 ke relative wahi hai jaisa 1 + L ko 0 ke relative study karna.
Ab F ( s ) = 1 + L ( s ) set karo aur C ko Nyquist contour banaao — poora imaginary axis s = j ω jo RHP mein ek infinite semicircle se closed hota hai (clockwise). Yeh contour poore RHP ko enclose karta hai.
F ke enclosed zeros = Z (unstable closed-loop poles — jo hum count karna chahte hain).
F ke enclosed poles = RHP mein L ke poles = P .
Origin ke around 1 + L ke clockwise encirclements = N .
Lekin 1 + L ka 0 encircle karna L ke − 1 encircle karne ke identical hai (bas 1 left shift karo). Isliye:
N = Z − P ⇒ Z = N + P .
Yahi poora criterion hai — seedha angle changes count karne se nikal aata hai.
L ( j ω ) ko ω : 0 + → ∞ ke liye sketch karo.
ω : − ∞ → 0 − ke liye reflect karo (real axis ke baare mein mirror image, kyunki L ( − j ω ) = L ( j ω ) ).
Contour close karo (big semicircle ka map — usually strictly proper L ke liye origin par shrink ho jaata hai).
− 1 ke net clockwise encirclements N count karo.
L ke poles se P find karo.
Z = N + P compute karo. Stable iff Z = 0 .
Worked example Example 1 — Stable, no RHP open-loop poles
L ( s ) = ( s + 1 ) ( s + 2 ) 2 .
P se kyun start karein? Poles − 1 , − 2 par: dono LHP mein ⇒ P = 0 .
Low freq: L ( 0 ) = 2/2 = 1 (positive real axis par). Kyun? ω = 0 set karo.
High freq: magnitude → 0 , phase → − 180° (do poles × − 90° ). Kyun? Har pole asymptotically − 90° add karta hai.
Plot + 1 se fourth quadrant se hote hue origin tak swing karta hai — woh kabhi − 1 ke around wrap nahi karta , isliye N = 0 .
Z = N + P = 0 + 0 = 0 → stable. ✓
Worked example Example 3 — Unstable open-loop plant made stable
L ( s ) = s − 1 K (s = + 1 par ek RHP pole, isliye P = 1 ).
Stability ke liye hum chahte hain Z = 0 ⇒ N = Z − P = − 1 : humein − 1 ka ek counter-clockwise encirclement chahiye.
L ( j ω ) = j ω − 1 K = 1 + ω 2 K ( − 1 − j ω ) . ω = 0 par: L = − K . Jaise ω → ∞ : → 0 .
Plot ek circle hai jo negative real axis par − K se guzarta hai. Agar K > 1 , point − 1 andar hota hai aur ek baar counter-clockwise encircle hota hai ⇒ N = − 1 , Z = 0 → stable. Agar K < 1 , koi encirclement nahi ⇒ Z = 1 → unstable.
Yeh ulta kyun lagta hai lekin sahi hai: ek unstable plant ko itna strong feedback chahiye jo curve ko − 1 ke around sahi tarike se wrap kare — encirclement hi stabilizing bookkeeping kar raha hai.
Common mistake "Encirclements of the origin"
Kyun sahi lagta hai: humne ise 1 + L se origin ke around derive kiya. Fix: hum L plot karte hain, 1 + L nahi , isliye shifted critical point − 1 hai. − 1 ke around wraps count karo.
Common mistake "Any encirclement means unstable"
Kyun sahi lagta hai: P = 0 systems ke liye, N > 0 ka matlab hai unstable. Fix: stability hai Z = 0 , yaani N = − P . Agar plant mein RHP poles hain (P > 0 ), toh tumhe CCW encirclements chahiye . Sign aur count dono matter karte hain.
Common mistake CW / CCW sign of
N confuse karna
Fix: Yahan standard convention — Nyquist contour clockwise traverse hota hai, aur N clockwise encirclements ko positive count karta hai. Ek CCW wrap N < 0 hai.
Common mistake Imaginary axis par poles bhool jaana
Kyun sahi lagta hai: tum ω = 0 plug karte ho aur blow up ho jaata hai. Fix: contour ko j ω -axis pole ke right ki taraf ek tiny semicircle se indent karo taaki woh RHP ke bahar rahe; woh arc plot par ek large sweep mein map hoti hai.
Recall Test yourself (answers chhupao)
Closed-loop poles kaunsi equation define karti hai? → 1 + L ( s ) = 0 .
Point − 1 kyun? → kyunki L = − 1 woh equation solve karta hai.
Count formula batao. → Z = N + P .
Ise kaunsa principle underlie karta hai? → Cauchy's argument principle.
N , P terms mein stable condition? → N = − P (taaki Z = 0 ).
Recall Feynman: ek 12-saal ke bachche ko explain karo
Socho tum ek canyon mein chilla rahe ho. Agar echo wapas kamzor aati hai, awaaz mar jaati hai — safe. Lekin agar echo bilkul utni hi tej aur usi direction mein wapas aati hai jis direction mein tumne push kiya tha , toh woh stack up hoti hai aur louder aur louder hoti jaati hai — yahi instability hai. Nyquist plot ek treasure-map hai isi baat ka ki echo tumhari awaaz ki har pitch par kaise behave karti hai. Map par ek "danger X" hai jise − 1 kehte hain. Hum poore map ka edge walk karte hain aur count karte hain ki khinchi hui line us X ke around kitni baar loop karti hai, aur kis direction mein spin karti hai. Woh count humein batata hai ki echo explode karegi ya nahi — aur humein actually ise phatte hue sunna nahi pada.
"Z = N + P" → "Z ombies N eed P oles" : unstable (zombie) closed-loop poles Z aate hain N yquist wraps plus P lant ke RHP poles se. Aur danger point hai minus one — "echo flipped aur full-strength."
Argument Principle (Cauchy) — mathematical engine.
Bode Plot & Gain/Phase Margins — margins, plot ke along − 1 se distances hain.
Routh–Hurwitz Criterion — RHP roots count karne ka algebraic alternative.
Root Locus — closed-loop poles ko gain K ke against track karta hai.
Feedback Control Basics — jahan se T = G / ( 1 + L ) aata hai.
Stability Margins in GNC Loops — attitude/autopilot loops mein application.
Nyquist: hum encirclements kis point ke count karte hain? Point − 1 + 0 j ke.
Nyquist count formula? Z = N + P , jisme Z =RHP closed-loop poles, N =CW encirclements of − 1 , P =RHP open-loop poles.
− 1 special kyun hai?Characteristic eq 1 + L = 0 ⇒ L = − 1 ; closed-loop poles wahan hote hain jahan open-loop L equals − 1 .
Nyquist kaunsa theorem deta hai? Cauchy's argument principle: closed contour ki image, origin ke around Z − P baar wind karti hai.
N , P terms mein stability condition?N = − P taaki Z = 0 .
Agar P = 0 aur plot − 1 encircle nahi karta, stable? Haan: N = 0 ⇒ Z = 0 .
Unstable plant P = 1 ko kya chahiye? − 1 ka ek counter-clockwise encirclement (N = − 1 ).
1 + L ki jagah L kyun plot karte hain?1 + L around 0 equals L around − 1 ; hum L plot karte hain, isliye critical point shift hokar − 1 ho jaata hai.
j ω -axis par pole kaise handle karein?Contour ko right ki taraf ek small semicircle se indent karo (pole ko RHP ke bahar rakho).
− 1 ka ek CW encirclement kya signify karta hai (P=0)?Ek closed-loop pole RHP mein cross ho gaya → instability.
Closed-loop T(s) = G / (1+L)
Characteristic eqn 1+L(s)=0
Poles in RHP means unstable
Cauchy Argument Principle
Nyquist contour encloses RHP
N = CW encirclements of -1
Z = closed-loop RHP poles