2.2.18 · D5 · HinglishFluid Mechanics

Question bankNavier-Stokes equations — derivation from Newton's second law for fluid

2,440 words11 min read↑ Read in English

2.2.18 · D5 · Physics › Fluid Mechanics › Navier-Stokes equations — derivation from Newton's second la


Symbol glossary (pehle yeh padho)

Neeche har trap mein wohi kuch symbols baar baar aate hain. Har ek ka matlab seedhi bhasha mein kya hai, ek picture ke saath anchor karke taaki kuch bhi undefined na rahe.

Figure — Navier-Stokes equations — derivation from Newton's second law for fluid

Sahi hai ya galat — justify karo

Steady flow () ka matlab hai ki har fluid particle ka acceleration zero hai.
Galat — ek particle phir bhi convective term ke through accelerate kar sakta hai, jaise ek patta narrow hoti nadi mein drift karte waqt speed up karta hai, bhale hi har fixed point pe flow kabhi nahi badalti. (Convective-acceleration figure dekho.)
Agar fluid ke andar pressure bahut bada ho lekin uniform ho, toh woh fluid blob pe bada net force produce karta hai.
Galat — uniform pressure sabhi faces pe equally push karta hai aur cancel ho jata hai; sirf gradient (blob ke across ek difference) net force density deta hai, isliye ki value motion ke liye irrelevant hai.
Viscous force density tab vanish hoti hai jab fluid tez move kar rahi ho.
Galat — yeh tab vanish hoti hai jab velocity field linear ya uniform ho (zero curvature ), speed se regardless; tez uniform flow mein koi viscous force nahi, jabki slow curved flow mein badi ho sakti hai.
Setting Navier–Stokes mein hydrostatic pressure result deta hai.
Galat — deta hai Euler's equation (); hydrostatics tabhi milti hai jab additionally bhi set karo.
Convective term velocity mein linear hai.
Galat — yeh nonlinear hai (velocity apne aap ke gradient ko multiply karti hai); yahi ek term turbulence aur fluid dynamics ki zyaadatar mushkil ka kaaran hai.
Rest mein fluid mein, pressure force density aur gravity force density dono zero hoti hain.
Galat — dono generally nonzero hoti hain aur balance karti hain: ( upar ke saath, yeh padha jata hai ). Zero net force ka matlab nahi ki individual force densities vanish ho jaayein.
Viscosity hamesha fluid ko slow kar deti hai.
Galat — viscosity momentum ko diffuse karti hai; yeh utni hi aasani se ek slow layer ko tez kar sakti hai usse faster layer ke saath drag karke. Yeh velocity differences remove karti hai, speed per se nahi.
Navier–Stokes equation energy conservation ka statement hai.
Galat — yeh momentum conservation hai, yani per unit volume. Energy ek alag (derivable) balance hai.
Compressible gas ke liye divergence hamesha zero hona chahiye.
Galat — incompressibility hai. Ek gas jo compress ya expand ho rahi hai uska hoga; density phir space aur time mein vary karti hai, aur yahi sound waves ko exist karne deta hai.

Error dhundho

"Fluid acceleration hai, bilkul mechanics mein ki tarah."
Error — ek field ke liye particle ek naye location pe move karta hai jahan alag hota hai, isliye tumhe convective term add karna padta hai: sahi acceleration hai .
"Pressure flow drive karta hai, isliye force density hai."
Error — dimensionally aur physically galat; force per volume ke liye blob ke across pressure ka difference chahiye, jo gradient hai (units ). Ek single value (units ) force density nahi ho sakti.
"Newton's law of viscosity hai , isliye viscous force density hai."
Error — sirf poore viscous stress tensor ka ek component hai, jo yahan valid hai kyunki humne simple shear choose ki. Saath hi ek stress hai (force per area); net force density element ke across stress ka difference hai, jo ek aur derivative add karta hai, aur incompressible flow ke liye deta hai.
"Hum har term se drop karte hain kyunki element chhota hai."
Error — hum isliye drop karte hain kyunki likhne ke baad yeh dono sides ka common factor hai; chhotaapan fields ko differentiable treat karne ko justify karta hai, cancellation ko nahi.
"Term material derivative ke andar hona chahiye kyunki gravity moving blob pe act karti hai."
Error — gravity ek body force hai jo ke force side pe baithti hai; material derivative sirf acceleration () side se belong karta hai.
"Continuity ek extra assumption hai jise hum gases ke liye ignore kar sakte hain."
Error — incompressibility constraint hai jo viscous term ko simplify karne ke liye use hoti hai; compressible gases ke liye yeh fail hoti hai, vary karta hai, aur ek extra term bulk viscosity ko involve karte hue appear hota hai. Yeh optional bookkeeping nahi hai.
" aur same cheez hain."
Error — pehla hai (velocity dotted into the gradient) pe acting (ek vector, convective acceleration); doosra hai ( ka divergence, ek scalar) se times. Bilkul alag operations hain.

Why questions

Fluid acceleration ko particle ke saath follow karte hue kyun track karna padta hai na ki ek fixed point pe?
Kyunki ek matter ke baare mein law hai (usi blob of mass ke baare mein), aur woh blob move karta hai; ek fixed point dekhne se alag alag particles us se guzarte hain. Isliye material derivative .
Viscous force density velocity ka second spatial derivative kyun hoti hai?
Ek face pe stress pehla derivative hai ; net force density blob ke across us stress ka difference hai, jo ek derivative ka derivative hai — ek second derivative . (Viscous-diffusion figure dekho: force profile ki curvature se aati hai.)
Pressure force gradient ke neeche kyun point karti hai ( sign)?
Fluid high pressure se low pressure ki taraf push hota hai; increasing ki taraf point karta hai, isliye force density hai, decreasing pressure ki taraf pointing. (Pressure-gradient figure dekho.)
Plane Poiseuille flow mein parabolic velocity profile kyun appear hoti hai?
Steady, unidirectional flow jisme pressure gradient hai, -equation reduce hoti hai boundary-value ODE pe no-slip ke saath. Ek baar integrate karo: . Dobara integrate karo: . apply karo ; apply karo . Isse downward parabola milta hai , dono walls pe zero aur centre pe maximum.
Reynolds number woh ratio kyun hai jo decide karta hai ki convective ya viscous term dominant hai?
Har term ki size estimate karo typical speed aur length use karke. Inertial term scale karta hai ; viscous term scale karta hai . Unka ratio hai . Bada → inertia (aur turbulence) jeetta hai; chhota → viscosity sab smooth kar deti hai. Note karo density essential hai; isse drop karna galat dimensions deta hai.
Gravity ko per unit volume treat kyun kar sakte hain bina har molecule ka weight track kiye?
Continuum picture mein blob ka mass hai, isliye uska weight hai; volume se divide karne par body-force density milti hai (units ) uniformly.
Navier–Stokes par Euler mein reduce kyun hoti hai, hydrostatics mein nahi?
Viscosity remove karna sirf friction term delete karta hai; fluid phir bhi move aur accelerate kar sakta hai, isliye inertia aur convective terms survive karte hain — yahi precisely inviscid flow equation hai, rest equation nahi.

Edge cases

Uniform flow ( const everywhere) ke liye viscous force density ka kya hota hai?
, isliye koi viscous force nahi — koi velocity difference nahi matlab layer-on-layer drag nahi, bhale hi fluid move kar raha ho.
Poiseuille flow ke exact centreline pe, kya viscous force density zero hai?
Shear stress (first derivative) wahan zero hai kyunki velocity maximum hai, lekin viscous force density nonzero aur everywhere constant hai — force supply karne wali curvature hai, slope nahi.
Solid wall pe bilkul (no-slip condition), fluid velocity kya hai aur pressure gradient ko kya balance karta hai?
Velocity wall pe zero hai, isliye koi acceleration nahi aur koi inertia nahi; pressure gradient puri tarah viscous term se balance hoti hai, isliye wall friction wahan sabse zyada hoti hai jahan profile sabse steep hoti hai.
Agar fluid rest mein hai, toh Navier–Stokes ke kaun se terms survive karte hain?
Sirf bachta hai — har velocity-dependent term (unsteady, convective, viscous) vanish ho jaata hai, hydrostatics recover hoti hai ( upar ke saath).
Bahut bade Reynolds number ki limit mein walls se door, kaun sa term typically negligible hota hai?
Viscous term inertia ke comparison mein chhota ho jaata hai, isliye flow approximately Euler flow jaisi behave karti hai — siwaaye walls ke paas thin boundary layers ke jahan viscosity hamesha matter karti hai.
Genuinely steady lekin curved flow ke liye (jaise constant pattern par bend ke aaspas flow), kya acceleration zero hai?
Nahi — lekin ka direction path ke saath change hota hai, isliye ek centripetal-style acceleration provide karta hai; steady ka matlab kabhi static nahi hota.
Equation kya predict karti hai agar tum (massless fluid) try karo?
Dono inertia side aur gravity term vanish ho jaate hain, chhod ke — ek degenerate massless balance; physically unrealistic, yeh signal karta hai ki density woh "matter" carry karta hai jo Newton's law ko chahiye. (Isse bhi blow up ho jaata hai.)
Ek compressible gas mein, kya sound (acoustic) wave exist kar sakti hai, aur kaun sa term isse possible banata hai?
Haan — sound density aur pressure ka ek chhota oscillation hai. Iske liye chahiye (fluid locally compress/expand hota hai), isliye yeh incompressible model ke bahar rehta hai; momentum equation ka varying- continuity equation ke saath coupling hi wave ko carry karta hai.
Kya bulk viscosity kabhi incompressible flow ko affect karti hai?
Nahi — bulk-viscosity term ke proportional hai, aur incompressibility force karti hai, isliye yeh bilkul drop ho jaata hai. Yeh sirf compressible motions jaise shock waves aur sound absorption ke liye matter karta hai.

Recall Ek-line self-audit

Agar upar koi bhi answer tumhe surprise kare, toh aage badhne se pehle parent note mein sirf usi ek term ko re-derive karo. Traps teen jagah cluster hote hain ::: material derivative (acceleration side), vs confusion, aur viscous term mein first-vs-second derivative.