2.1.18 · D4 · HinglishAnalytical Mechanics

ExercisesAction-angle variables — integrable systems

3,226 words15 min read↑ Read in English

2.1.18 · D4 · Physics › Analytical Mechanics › Action-angle variables — integrable systems

Shuru karne se pehle, ek symbol ko clear kar lete hain jis par sabka dhyaan atakta hai. Loop symbol ka matlab hai: us poori band curve ke around ko add karo jo motion phase space mein trace karti hai — jis plane ka horizontal axis (position) aur vertical axis (momentum) hai. Is plane ko phase space kehte hain. Ek bounded, repeating motion wahan ek closed loop banati hai — Figure s01 dekho: orange curve aisi hi ek loop hai, shaded interior area hai, aur teal arrow batata hai ki state us loop ke around kis direction mein chalti hai.

Figure — Action-angle variables — integrable systems

Figure s01 — ka matlab. Shaded region enclosed area hai; ise se divide karne par action milta hai. Neeche ke har exercise ka dil yehi hai: "yeh area nikalo, phir differentiate karo."


Level 1 — Recognition

L1.1 — Ek picture se action padh lena

Recall Solution

WHAT: literally loop se enclosed geometric area hai — symbol ka poora content yehi hai (exactly Figure s01 mein shaded region). WHY: Green's theorem se . Radius ke circle ka area hai, toh Koi calculus nahi chahiye — "action = area / " ki pehchaan hi yahan poori skill hai.

L1.2 — Kaun sa contour? (aur knife-edge case)

Recall Solution

(i) Critical energy se neeche → libration. Angle , ke beech jhoolti hai aur reverse karti hai — round-trip contour hai (usual 2 ka factor aata hai). (ii) Critical energy se upar → rotation. Yahan badhta rehta hai aur kabhi reverse nahi karta, toh ek period hai (pendulum ek poora chakkar lagaane ke baad same physical state par wapas aata hai, ek baar traverse hoke). (iii) Exactly critical energy par → separatrix, ek infinite-period edge case. Knife-edge energy par pendulum finite time mein ka chakkar pura nahi karta: woh unstable top () ki taraf asymptotically creep karta hai aur wahan pahunchne mein infinitely lamba waqt laata hai, isliye aur . Phase space mein yeh curve separatrix kehlaati hai — yeh libration region (andar closed ovals) aur rotation region (bahar open waves) ke beech ki boundary hai, aur yeh genuinely periodic orbit bilkul nahi hai. Action-angle variables theek isi par break down karte hain (frequency zero ho jaati hai), aur yehi reason hai ki perturbation theory separatrices ke paas sabse mushkil hoti hai.


Level 2 — Application

L2.1 — Linear-force (SHO) oscillator ka action, scratch se

Recall Solution

Step A — nikalo. solve karo ke liye: . Step B — ellipse pehchano. ko se divide karo: yeh ek ellipse hai jiske semi-axes ke along aur ke along hain. Step C — area / . Ellipse area . Isliye Step D — differentiate. ✔ Frequency bina koi trajectory solve kiye nikal aayi.

L2.2 — Rescaled oscillator

Recall Solution

Pehle definition ka connection: L2.1 ke se compare karne par dikhata hai ki potential coefficient hai hi ; yeh spring ki fixed property hai, jabki spring par latak rahe mass par depend karta hai. L2.1 se, . double karne par . (a) — loop same energy par guna zyada area enclose karta hai (bhaari ⇒ har par zyada momentum). (b) — slower, as expected for a heavier bob.

L2.3 — Particle in a box, frequency bina orbit ke

Recall Solution

Step A: , magnitude mein constant hai (walls ke beech koi force nahi). Step B — the loop. Phase space mein orbit ek rectangle hai (Figure s02 dekho): top edge (daayein chalti, ), bottom edge (baayein chalti, ). Dono legs contribute karti hain: Step C: . Invert karo: . Step D: jahan ; period . ✔ Bilkul round-trip bounce time.

Figure — Action-angle variables — integrable systems

Figure s02 — box orbit phase space mein ek rectangle hai. Orange (rightward) aur teal (leftward) edges mein se har ek area enclose karti hai; milke dete hain . Yeh picture hi wajah hai ki 2 ka factor unavoidable hai.


Level 3 — Analysis

L3.1 — Anharmonic well

Recall Solution

WHAT/WHY — brute force ki jagah scaling. Hume -dependence chahiye, toh ek substitution use karo jo saare 's ko integral ke bahar nikal de. Pehle contour fix karo. Motion libration hai: dono turning points ke beech chalti hai jahan , yaani jahan . Closed loop hai. Substitute karo , toh aur . Jab , se tak jaata hai, naya variable , se tak jaata hai; round-trip (wahan aur wapas) ise double karta hai. Phir Yahan sirf ek fixed positive number hai: dimensionful constants times definite integral (ek plain number, ke ek hump ke neeche ka area), aur return leg ke liye extra factor 2 ke saath. Isme koi energy dependence nahi hai, aur yehi poori baat hai. Toh , yaani . Differentiate karo: . Interpretation: SHO ke unlike (jiska energy-independent hai kyunki well quadratic hai), ek steeper well higher-energy orbits ko zyada tezi se squeeze karta hai ⇒ higher frequency. ki yeh energy-dependence exactly woh hai jo anharmonic systems ko non-isochronous banati hai.

L3.2 — Degenerate / limiting case: free particle on a ring

Recall Solution

WHY 2 ka factor nahi: rotation ka matlab hai monotonically se badhta hai; contour ek baar traverse hoti hai, wahan-aur-wapas nahi. Yahan action equals momentum — ek special symmetric case (yeh "" temptation ka honest version hai). Phir aur Angle-variable frequency actual angular velocity ke barabar hai, jaisa uniform circular motion ke liye hona chahiye.


Level 4 — Synthesis

L4.1 — Box ka Bohr–Sommerfeld spectrum

Recall Solution

Set up: . ke saath, yeh hai , toh . Energy: . Compare: yeh exact answer se bilkul match karta hai — box un rare cases mein se hai jahan semiclassical quantization exact hai (koi zero-point offset nahi, kyunki walls hard hain). SHO se contrast karo, jahan Bohr–Sommerfeld deta hai : smooth turning points se aata hai (Maslov correction), jo hard walls ke liye absent hai.

L4.2 — Adiabatic invariance: dheere-dheere simatat hua box

Recall Solution

Key idea: slow ⇒ fixed rehta hai. L2.3 se, , toh . constant rakhke: Sanity check: box squeeze karna () energy raise karta hai — particle speed up hoti hai, exactly ek approaching wall se bounce karne waali ball ki tarah jo speed gain karti hai. Agar , toh .


Level 5 — Mastery

L5.1 — Non-isochronous winding on a 2-torus

Recall Solution

Torus surface ko ek unit square mein unroll karke dekho jiske left/right edges glued hain aur top/bottom edges glued hain (Figure s03). par ek point slope ki seedhi line mein chalta hai; jab ek edge chodta hai toh opposite edge se re-enter karta hai. (a) Rational ratio ⇒ closed orbit. Likho , ek common base rate ke saath. State tab repeat hoti hai jab dono angles ke whole multiples se advance ho jaayein: ko ek chakkar ke liye time chahiye, ko . Common period woh chota sa hai jis par aur integers ke liye. Sabse chhota: deta hai . Curve ke 3 loops aur ke 2 loops ke baad close hoti hai — ek (3,2) torus knot (Figure s03 ka left panel). (b) Irrational ratio ⇒ kabhi close nahi hoti. Koi integers satisfy nahi karte , toh orbit kabhi exactly repeat nahi hoti; bajaaye iske woh forever wind karti hai aur poori torus surface ko densely fill karti hai (quasi-periodic motion — Figure s03 ka right panel). (c) KAM link (ek line): KAM theorem kehta hai ki integrable system mein small perturbations ke under, sufficiently irrational frequency ratios waale tori survive karte hain (deform hote hain par bane rehte hain), jabki rational ya near-rational ratios waale pehle chaos mein toot jaate hain.

Figure s03 — unrolled 2-torus par winding. Left: rational ratio ek finite knot mein close hota hai. Right: irrational ratio kabhi close nahi hota aur points ko poore square par densely spray karta hai. Yeh visual KAM story ka dil hai.

L5.2 — Kepler-style radial action (open synthesis)

Recall Solution

Invert karo. set karo. Phir , toh , milta hai Frequency ke liye differentiate karo. Kyunki sirf sum par depend karta hai, dono frequencies barabar hain: Matlab: matlab radial aur angular motions ek frequency share karte hain — orbit exactly ek radial oscillation per revolution ke baad close hoti hai ⇒ ek closed ellipse (koi precession nahi). Kepler problem ki yeh "accidental" degeneracy isi wajah hai ki sirf (aur ) potentials closed orbits dete hain — woh gehri wajah jisse planetary ellipses dheere-dheere rotate nahi karti. Quantization finish karo (Bohr–Sommerfeld). Semiclassically har action ka integer multiple hai: radial quantum number aur angular wala likho, toh sum ek single principal quantum number hai (). substitute karo: Coulomb coupling ke saath yeh exactly hydrogen spectrum hai . Upar jo degeneracy humne nikali woh is fact ka classical shadow hai ki hydrogen levels sirf par depend karte hain (alag se par nahi) — woh celebrated -degeneracy.


Recall Quick self-test (cloze)

Action phase-space area divided by == hoti hai. Libration ke liye 2 ka factor aata hai kyunki loop wahan aur wapas jaata hai; rotation ke liye contour ek baar traverse hoti hai. Exactly critical pendulum energy par orbit separatrix hai, jiska period infinite== hai (frequency ). Frequency ==differentiating == se milti hai (yaani ). Ek quantity jo slow parameter changes ke under conserved hoti hai use adiabatic invariant kehte hain, aur conserved cheez ==== hai (energy nahi). -torus par, ek irrational frequency ratio orbit ko torus ko densely fill karta hai (quasi-periodic); Diophantine ratio woh hoti hai jo fractions se approximate karna mushkil ho aur isliye perturbation survive karta hai.


Connections

  • Parent topic — Action-angle variables
  • Bohr–Sommerfeld quantization — L4.1 aur Kepler/hydrogen spectrum
  • Adiabatic invariants — L4.2, kyun slow change ke under frozen hota hai
  • Liouville–Arnold theorem aur KAM theorem — L5.1 torus winding aur Diophantine survival
  • Hamiltonian mechanics, Canonical transformations, Generating functions, Hamilton–Jacobi equation, Poisson brackets — recipe ke peeche ki machinery