4.9.14 · D4 · HinglishProbability Theory & Statistics

ExercisesTransformations of random variables — change-of-variable technique

1,765 words8 min read↑ Read in English

4.9.14 · D4 · Maths › Probability Theory & Statistics › Transformations of random variables — change-of-variable tec

Woh pieces yaad karo jo tum baar baar reuse karoge:

  • hai inverse map — yeh jawab deta hai "kaun sa tha jisne yeh produce kiya?"
  • hai Jacobian, local stretch factor (dekho Jacobian Determinant).
  • Har answer mein (a) uska support batana zaroori hai (jahaan reh sakta hai) aur (b) woh integrate to 1 kare.

L1 · Recognition

Recall Solution 1.1

Kya hai: ek affine map jisme . Formula kyun laagoo hota hai: strictly increasing hai, isliye yeh one-to-one hai — ek hi branch. Invert karo: . Jacobian: , magnitude . density ko dilute karta hai kyunki axis ko factor se stretch karne par same mass teen gune length mein phail jaata hai.

Recall Solution 1.2

Yahan hai. use karke normal density ke saath yeh standard normal ban jaata hai: . Dekho Normal Distribution. Yeh exactly standardisation hai: mean ghatao, standard deviation se divide karo.


L2 · Application

Recall Solution 2.1

Monotonic hai? strictly increasing hai → ek branch. Range: , toh support hai . Invert: . Jacobian: ( ke liye positive). Yeh standard log-normal hai. Extra Jacobian hai, yeh optional nahi hai.

Recall Solution 2.2

par increasing hai; range . Invert: . Jacobian . Kyunki on : Check: ✓ Density ki taraf badhti hai — square root lene se chhote alag alag ho jaate hain aur bade ke paas pack ho jaate hain.


L3 · Analysis

Recall Solution 3.1

Neeche figure ka fold support par dikhata hai. Aise padho: vertical axis par ek height lo, horizontal line kheeencho, aur dekho kitni baar yeh blue parabola ko hit karti hai support ke andar dashed lines aur ke beech mein. Yellow line par do baar hit karti hai ( aur dono support ke andar), jabki red line par curve ko support ke andar ek baar hit karti hai (green dot par) kyunki doosra root left of ho jaata hai (red ✗, bahar). Yahi wajah hai ki density ke do alag pieces hain.

Figure — Transformations of random variables — change-of-variable technique
par decreasing aur par increasing hai. Range: . ke roots: , lekin sirf woh roots count hote hain jo ke andar hon.

  • ke liye: dono aur mein hain (yellow line). Do branches.
  • ke liye: support ke bahar gir jaata hai (red ✗), toh sirf bachta hai. Ek branch.

Jacobian per branch: , aur jahan bhi defined ho. Total mass check:

Recall Solution 3.2

Do roots , dono full support mein. even hai, isliye dono equally contribute karte hain: Yeh chi-square with 1 degree of freedom hai.


L4 · Synthesis

Recall Solution 4.1

CDF directly use karo (yahan densities se zyada clean hai): Beech ka step dono sides par apply karta hai — legal hai kyunki increasing hai isliye "" preserve hota hai. Kyunki par uniform hai, for . ke saath: Toh ka exactly CDF hai. Isliye ek computer sirf uniform generator se koi bhi distribution produce kar sakta hai.

Recall Solution 4.2

CDF invert karo: . Toh . Kyunki bhi Uniform hai, tidy form bhi kaam karta hai. Change-of-variable se density check (, , ): Exactly .


L5 · Mastery

Recall Solution 5.1

Linear map invert karo: . Inverse ka Jacobian matrix banao: Determinant map ka area-scaling factor hai — yeh rotate-and-scale areas ko half karta hai. Support: map poore plane ka linear bijection hai, toh saare par range karta hai (jahaan transported nonzero ho); ke par supported hone par yeh full hai.

Recall Solution 5.2

Joint density . Inverse substitute karo. Pehle exponent expand karo, cross-terms dhyan se: cross-terms exactly cancel ho jaate hain — yehi cheez aur ko cleanly separate hone deti hai. Ab integrate out karo: kyun: standard Gaussian integral use karo ke saath, jo deta hai . Isliye Yeh hai (variance ). MGF cross-check: har ka hota hai; independence MGFs ko multiply karta hai, jo deta hai , yani ka MGF. ✓ (Dekho Expectation and LOTUS ki MGFs kyun multiply hote hain.)