4.6.12 · D5 · HinglishOrdinary Differential Equations

Question bankCase 2 - repeated real root — reduction of order

1,575 words7 min read↑ Read in English

4.6.12 · D5 · Maths › Ordinary Differential Equations › Case 2 - repeated real root — reduction of order

Shuru karne se pehle anchor facts yaad karo:

  • Ek repeated root tab aata hai jab discriminant ho, jisse ek root milta hai .
  • Do independent solutions hain aur , isliye .
  • Independence Wronskian se certified hoti hai.

True ya false — justify karo

ek valid general solution hai jab double root ho.
False — yeh collapse ho jaata hai mein, yaani ek hi arbitrary constant times ek function, isliye yeh sirf 1-dimensional space span karta hai aur do independent initial conditions meet nahi kar sakta.
Ek repeated root ke liye, aur har ke liye linearly independent hain.
True — unka Wronskian hai, aur kyunki ek exponential kabhi zero nahi hota, poori line pe, isliye ve independent hain.
Agar discriminant exactly zero hai, toh do characteristic roots complex hain.
False — zero discriminant ka matlab hai do real roots coincide karte hain; complex roots ke liye negative discriminant chahiye, jo Case 3 hai.
Reduction of order sirf repeated-root case mein apply ki ja sakti hai.
False — reduction of order tab bhi kaam karta hai jab tumhare paas ek solution pehle se ho; repeated-root case sirf wahi jagah hai jahan yeh clean produce karta hai.
ke saath doosre solution mein exactly multiply hona chahiye; bhi utna hi kaam karega.
False for a double root — ek double root wale second-order ODE ka solution nahi hai; sirf triple root ke liye aata hai, per Higher-order repeated roots.
, ka solution isliye hai kyunki root repeated hai.
True — plug karne pe milta hai; ka coefficient sirf tab vanish hota hai jab ho, yaani repeated case, yahi ko survive karne deta hai.
Agar tum ek repeated-root ODE ko scale karo (har coefficient ko ek nonzero constant se multiply karo), toh solution set badal jaata hai.
False — ko kisi bhi nonzero se multiply karne pe same equation rehti hai; root aur solutions unchanged rehte hain.
Limit derivation mein, jab .
True — yeh quotient do genuine solutions ka difference hai ek constant se divide karke, isliye yeh solution rehta hai, aur iska limit hai.
Ek repeated root ke liye, aur dono ke saath zero decay karte hain chahe ka sign kuch bhi ho.
False — ye sirf tab decay karte hain jab ho; agar toh dono grow karte hain, aur agar toh ye aur ban jaate hain, jo decay nahi karte.

Error dhundo

" ke roots aur hain, isliye ."
Error: hai, ek double root , nahi; sahi solution hai .
"Reduction se milta hai, isliye ."
Error: poora , ko multiply karta hai, isliye ; term ke saath bhi factor hona chahiye.
"Kyunki ka matlab hai constant hai, doosra solution sirf ek aur hai."
Error: se milta hai, jo ek linear function hai, constant nahi; naya piece term hai jo produce karta hai.
" ke liye repeated root hai."
Error: hai, isliye ; student se divide karna bhool gaya, sirf se nahi.
"Kyunki dono roots ke barabar hain, do exponentials ka Wronskian zero hai, isliye koi independent pair exist nahi karta."
Error: sirf ek exponential hai; sahi partner hai, aur aur ka Wronskian hai.
" pe apply karne se milta hai."
Error: pe term vanish ho jaata hai aur hai, isliye ; baad mein se fix hota hai.
" ka characteristic equation mein factor hota hai, jisse distinct roots milte hain."
Error: yeh mein factor hota hai, ek repeated root ; student ne constant term ka sign galat liya.

Why questions

Ek second-order ODE ko exactly do independent solutions kyun chahiye?
Iska solution set ek 2-dimensional vector space hai, isliye koi bhi solution do basis functions ka unique combination hota hai — do initial data match karne ke liye itni freedom chahiye.
Repeated-root reduction mein DONO aur terms kyun disappear ho jaate hain?
-coefficient hai kyunki ek root hai, aur -coefficient hai kyunki ; double root dono ko simultaneously hold karata hai.
Hum bas kyun nahi le sakte ek "second" root ke saath jaise Case 1 mein?
Koi doosra distinct root nahi hai — discriminant zero hai isliye dono roots same pe collapse ho jaate hain, sirf ek function bacha ke Case 1 ki recipe.
pe lagana (kisi aur factor ki jagah) missing solution kyun produce karta hai?
Reduction of order force karta hai, jiska non-constant solution linear hai; double root ki algebra ko single out karti hai, aur coalescing-roots limit ise ke roop mein confirm karta hai.
Characteristic equation method humein yahan do solutions kyun nahi deta, unlike distinct-root case mein?
Trial ODE ko ek quadratic mein convert karta hai; ek double root ek hi number hai, isliye ek hi exponential milta hai — "do coincident roots" ki geometry algebra ko ek solution short chhod deti hai.
ka sign is baat ke liye irrelevant kyun hai ki independent hain ya nahi?
Independence Wronskian ke nonzero hone pe depend karta hai, aur kisi bhi real exponent ke exponentials strictly positive hote hain, isliye koi bhi unhe dependent nahi bana sakta.
General solution automatically is ODE ke kisi bhi initial-value problem ko satisfy kyun karta hai?
Do free constants exactly do degrees of freedom dete hain, do conditions match karne ke liye; nonzero Wronskian guarantee karta hai ki resulting system solvable hai.

Edge cases

Jab repeated root ho (jaise ) toh solutions kya hain?
ke saath, aur , isliye — straight lines, phir bhi do independent functions.
Agar ho isliye equation degenerate ho ke ban jaaye, toh kya repeated-root picture ab bhi apply hoti hai?
Nahi — ODE first order mein drop ho jaata hai, ek 1-dimensional solution space hai, aur sirf ek exponential hai; poori "missing partner" story ke liye genuine second-order term chahiye.
Third-order ODE mein triple root ke liye, solution basis kya hai?
Higher-order repeated roots: multiplicity se powers through times milte hain.
Jab do nearly-equal roots aur merge hote hain, exponential solutions ke pair ka kya hota hai?
Ve nearly parallel ho jaate hain; unka normalized difference , ke paas pahunchta hai, isliye basis smoothly do exponentials se mein deform ho jaata hai.
ka long-run behaviour kya hai jab ho?
Yeh ki taraf tend karta hai, kyunki exponential decay eventually ki linear growth ko beat kar deta hai — exponential polynomial ko hara deta hai.
Jab ho lekin ho toh long-run behaviour kya hai?
linearly bina bound ke grow (ya fall) karta hai, kyunki term ko tame karne ke liye koi decaying exponential nahi hai.
Kya aur kabhi simultaneously kisi finite pe zero ho sakte hain?
Nahi — hamesha rehta hai, isliye kabhi zero nahi hota aur sirf pe vanish hota hai, jahan dono Wronskian ke through phir bhi independent hain.

Recall Har trap ki ek-line summary

Ek double root sirf ek exponential deta hai; honest fix hai, se force hota hai aur nonzero Wronskian se confirm hota hai. Constants kabhi collapse mat karo, kabhi mat chhodo, mein hamesha se divide karo, aur yaad rakho decay ke liye chahiye.

Connections