Worked examples — Integrating factors for non-exact equations
4.6.7 · D3· Maths › Ordinary Differential Equations › Non-exact equations ke liye Integrating Factors
Yeh page Integrating factors for non-exact equations ki "shooting range" hai. Hum tumhare upar har tarah ki problem chalate hain — clean -factors, clean -factors, woh trap jahan tumhe beech mein switch karna padta hai, ek already-exact equation (degenerate case), ek limiting/undefined case, ek word problem, aur ek exam twist — aur hum har ek ko end tak solve karte hain, phir verify bhi karte hain.
Shuru karne se pehle: yahan sab kuch parent note ke ek test aur do formulas par tika hua hai. Main unhe seedhe shabdon mein dobara bolunga taaki koi symbol bina samjhe naa aaye.
Recall Teen tools jinpar hum rely karte hain
Exactness test. Equation ko ki tarah likho. Yahan hai "woh cheez jo step ko right mein multiply karti hai" aur hai "woh cheez jo step ko upar multiply karti hai". Equation exact hoti hai jab — yaani "M ka -slope, N ke -slope ke barabar hai". ( ka matlab: ko freeze karo, dekho kitni tez ke badhne se change hota hai.) -factor test: agar mein koi nahi bachta, toh ise kaho aur rakho. -factor test: agar mein koi nahi bachta, toh ise kaho aur rakho. Pehle figure mein aane wali hai ek picture ki " kya fix karta hai".
Scenario matrix
Is topic ki har problem in cells mein se kisi ek mein aati hai. Neeche ke worked examples un cells ke saath tagged hain jo woh hit karte hain, aur milke yeh sabhi ko cover karte hain.
| # | Cell (scenario class) | Kya khaas baat hai | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Already exact () | degenerate case: , koi fixing nahi chahiye | Ex 1 |
| B | Clean -factor | ratio apna kho deta hai | Ex 2 |
| C | Clean -factor | pehla ratio abhi bhi rakhta hai; switch karo aur jeet lo | Ex 3 |
| D | Sign trap in the -numerator | vs — purana sign carry nahi karna | Ex 4 |
| E | Neither pure- nor pure- (limiting/failure) | dono ratios dono letters rakhte hain — kya karein | Ex 5 |
| F | Word problem (real units) | model → identify karo → solve → units check karo | Ex 6 |
| G | Linear ODE in disguise | ek special -factor hai | Ex 7 |
| H | Exam twist: negative/zero regions | ka sign, domain jahan undefined hai | Ex 8 |

Cell A — already exact (degenerate case)
Cell B — clean -factor
Cell C — pehla ratio rakhta hai, switch karo aur jeet lo
Cell D — sign trap
Cell E — na pure- na pure- (limiting/failure case)
par single-variable factor se koshish karo. Forecast: kya tumhe ya exist karne ki umeed hai? "Neither" predict karo aur dekho kyun.
Step 1 — test. , . , . Exact nahi.
Step 2 — -test. — DONO letters hain. ✗ -test. — bach jaata hai. ✗ Yeh kyun hota hai? Koi bhi ratio ek variable mein collapse nahi hota, isliye koi single-variable exist nahi karta. Yeh Cell E hai, honest failure case.
Step 3 — iske bajaaye kya karein. Tumhe ya toh ki form ka factor guess karna hoga ya koi aur shape, ya phir bilkul alag method par jaana hoga. Yeh mention kyun? Taaki tum kabhi aise formula par forever grind naa karo jo apply hi nahi ho sakta. Jaldi failure recognize karna ek skill hai.
Escape route (bonus). ki tarah rewrite karo — yeh hamare topic ka nahi hai, lekin homogeneous-type substitution handle kar leta hai. Lesson wahi rehta hai: Cell E ka matlab parent ke dono formulas genuinely kuch nahi dete.
Verify (ki dono ratios sachchi mein dono letters rakhte hain): par -ratio hai lekin par yeh hai — value fixed par ke saath badli, prove karta hai ki yeh akele ka function nahi. ✓
Cell F — real units wala word problem
, jahan (metres) ek position coordinate hai aur (metres) ek equipotential trace karne wale particle ka doosra position coordinate hai. Curves ki family dhundho aur dimensional consistency check karo. Forecast: exact hai ya nahi? Dono slopes peek karo.
Step 1 — naam lo aur test karo. , . , . Already exact (word problem ke andar Cell A pattern). Yeh step kyun? Real models often purpose se exact banaye jaate hain; dhundne se pehle hamesha test karo.
Step 2 — banao. .
Step 3 — dimensional check (sahi tarike se kiya). Dono aur metres mein hone par, term ki units hain aur ki units hain — yeh match karte hain, toh sum dimensionally sound hai jahan in . Yeh kyun matter karta hai: agar ke dono terms ki alag units hoti toh tumhe pata chal jaata ki algebra mein koi galti hui — ek free error-catcher. (Isliye maine dono variables metres mein chunhe instead of seconds aur degrees mix karne ke, jo artificial rescaling force karta.)
Verify: . ✓
Cell G — linear ODE disguise mein
ko integrating factor use karke solve karo, aur ise ek special -factor ki tarah dekho. Forecast: ek first-order linear ODE ka hamesha hota hai. Compute karne se pehle guess karo.
Step 1 — differential form mein rakho. Sab kuch ek side move karo: . Toh , . Yeh step kyun? machinery use karne ke liye humein layout chahiye.
Step 2 — -test. , . — pure . ✓ Yeh guaranteed kyun hai: linear ke liye yeh ratio hamesha exactly hota hai, isliye -factor formula reproduce karta hai. Dekho Linear first-order ODEs.
Step 3 — .
Step 4 — multiply karo, re-test karo. , . . ✓
Step 5 — . .
Verify: ke saath, ; phir . ✓ ( se match karta hai)
Cell H — exam twist: monomial factor, signs, zeros
solve karo, phir batao ki integrating factor kahan undefined ya zero hai. Forecast: dono single-variable tests fail honge — toh hum monomial dhundhte hain. Padhne se pehle guess karo.
Step 1 — test. , . , . Exact nahi.
Step 2 — single-variable tests dono fail karte hain. ( hai); ( hai). Dono fail → try karo. Yeh step kyun? Jab dono single-variable tests fail hon (Cell E symptom), monomial guess often ek exam problem rescue kar leta hai.
Step 3 — ke liye systematic matching. ke saath, , likho aur exactness impose karo. Compute karo: Ab like power-terms match karo (equation ka parser): terms aur terms ko alag-alag agree karna chahiye. "Like terms match" kyun? Do polynomials tabhi equal hote hain jab har matching monomial ka coefficient equal ho — yeh ek exactness equation ko ek chhoti linear system mein convert kar deta hai.
Step 4 — system solve karo. Pehle se: . Doosre se: . Solve karo: pehle ko se multiply karo, doosre ko se: aur ; subtract karo: , phir . Toh — koi guessing nahi, equations ne force kiya.
Step 5 — multiply karo, re-test karo. , . , . Equal ✓
Step 6 — banao. .
Step 7 — kahan khatam hota hai. axes aur par zero hai. Un lines par se multiply karna information destroy kar deta hai (hum zero se multiply kar rahe the), isliye koi bhi solution branch jo kisi axis par lie kare use alag se check karna padega — exam ke hidden marks.
Verify: . ✓
Coverage check
Cell A — already exact / degenerate ::: Ex 1 (aur Ex 6, ek exact word problem) Cell B — clean -factor, ratio apna kho deta hai ::: Ex 2 () Cell C — pehla ratio rakhta hai, -test par switch karo ::: Ex 3 () Cell D — -numerator mein sign trap ::: Ex 4 () Cell E — koi single-variable exist nahi karta (failure case) ::: Ex 5 Cell F — genuine units check ke saath word problem ::: Ex 6 Cell G — linear ODE ek special -factor ke roop mein ::: Ex 7 (), links Linear first-order ODEs Cell H — monomial factor aur axes jahan ::: Ex 8 ()
Scenario matrix ke sabhi eight cells mein ab fully worked, verified examples hain. ✓
Connections
- Integrating factors for non-exact equations — parent method jise yeh examples drill karte hain
- Exact differential equations — Cell A yahi hai, unchanged
- Total differentials and potential functions — har " banana" step
- Linear first-order ODEs — Ex 7 ka
- Separable equations — Cell E mein fallback
- Mixed partial derivatives (Clairaut's theorem) — exactness test kyun kaam karta hai
- Conservative vector fields — conservative-field ki picture hai