4.6.7 · Maths › Ordinary Differential Equations
Ek "fixer" jise tum ek stubborn ODE se multiply karte ho taaki woh exact ban jaye, aur phir tum use potential functions se solve kar sako.
Hum ek first-order ODE ko differential form mein likhte hain:
M ( x , y ) d x + N ( x , y ) d y = 0.
Definition Exact equation
Equation M d x + N d y = 0 exact hai agar koi potential F ( x , y ) exist kare jiske saath
∂ x ∂ F = M , ∂ y ∂ F = N .
Tab solution simply F ( x , y ) = C hota hai.
Intuition WHY exactness matters
Agar M d x + N d y ek total differential d F = F x d x + F y d y hai, tab ODE kehta hai
d F = 0 , yaani F solution curves ke saath nahi badalta — isliye F = C . ODE solve karna
sirf F dhundhne tak collapse ho jaata hai. Poora game yeh hai: kya main left side ko ek perfect differential ki tarah likh sakta hoon?
Exactness test. Kyunki mixed partials commute karte hain (F x y = F y x smooth F ke liye):
M y = F x y = F y x = N x .
Isliye:
Exact ⟺ M y = N x .
Agar M y = N x , toh koi F exist nahi karta aur hum phanse hain... jab tak hum poori equation ko kisi
function μ ( x , y ) se multiply na karein, jise integrating factor kehte hain:
μ M d x + μ N d y = 0.
Iske solution curves SAME hain (humne sirf kisi nonzero cheez se multiply kiya), lekin ab hum demand karte hain ki yeh
exact ho.
Intuition WHY yeh allowed hai
M d x + N d y = 0 ko μ = 0 se multiply karne se woh jagah nahi badlati jahan expression zero hai —
solution set identical hai. Hum μ choose karne ke liye free hain taaki form nice (exact) ho jaye, jaise tum
ek fraction ko clever 1 se multiply karte ho.
Multiplied equation ki exactness ke liye zaroori hai
∂ y ∂ ( μ M ) = ∂ x ∂ ( μ N ) .
Dono sides ko product rule se expand karo:
μ y M + μ M y = μ x N + μ N x .
Rearrange karo:
N μ x − M μ y = μ ( M y − N x )
Yeh μ ke liye ek PDE hai — generally original ODE jitna hi mushkil! Trick yeh hai ki guess karo ki
μ sirf ek hi variable par depend karta hai, jo ek term ko khatam kar deta hai.
Tab μ y = 0 , μ x = μ ′ . PDE ban jaati hai
N μ ′ = μ ( M y − N x ) ⟹ μ μ ′ = N M y − N x .
Intuition WHY ek variable
μ ( x ) ke exist karne ke liye, right side sirf x par depend karni chahiye — warna μ μ ′
(jo x ka function hai) ko kisi aisi cheez ke barabar hona padega jisme y ho. Yahi consistency check hai.
Symmetry se (μ x = 0 ):
− M μ ′ = μ ( M y − N x ) ⟹ μ μ ′ = M N x − M y .
Recall Forecast-then-verify
μ calculate karne se pehle: predict karo ki kaun sa case apply hoga — check karo ki N M y − N x se
y hatt jaata hai ya nahi, ya M N x − M y se x hatt jaata hai ya nahi. Textbook problems mein inme se ek usually kaam karta hai.
M d x + N d y = 0 ki tarah likho.
Test karo: kya M y = N x hai? Agar haan, toh step 5 par jaao.
N M y − N x compute karo → x ka function hai? μ ( x ) use karo. Warna
M N x − M y compute karo → y ka function hai? μ ( y ) use karo.
μ se multiply karo. Ab exact hai.
F dhundho: F x = M ∗ ko x mein integrate karo, unknown ϕ ( y ) add karo, y mein differentiate karo, N ∗ se match karo.
Solution: F ( x , y ) = C .
Solve karo ( 3 x y + y 2 ) d x + ( x 2 + x y ) d y = 0.
Yahaan M = 3 x y + y 2 , N = x 2 + x y .
M y = 3 x + 2 y , N x = 2 x + y . Kyun? M ko y ke saath differentiate karo, N ko x ke saath.
Exact nahi kyunki 3 x + 2 y = 2 x + y .
N M y − N x = x 2 + x y ( 3 x + 2 y ) − ( 2 x + y ) = x ( x + y ) x + y = x 1 .
Yeh step kyun? Numerator factor aur cancel ho jaata hai ( x + y ) se, aur sirf ek pure-x function bachta hai — isliye
Case 1 kaam karta hai.
μ = exp ( ∫ x 1 d x ) = e l n x = x .
Multiply karo: M ∗ = 3 x 2 y + x y 2 , N ∗ = x 3 + x 2 y .
Exact check karo: M y ∗ = 3 x 2 + 2 x y , N x ∗ = 3 x 2 + 2 x y . ✓
F dhundho: F = ∫ ( 3 x 2 y + x y 2 ) d x = x 3 y + 2 1 x 2 y 2 + ϕ ( y ) .
ϕ ( y ) kyun? x ke saath integration ka "constant" y par depend kar sakta hai.
F y = x 3 + x 2 y + ϕ ′ ( y ) ko N ∗ = x 3 + x 2 y ke barabar hona chahiye, isliye ϕ ′ ( y ) = 0 .
x 3 y + 2 1 x 2 y 2 = C .
Solve karo y d x + ( 2 x − y e y ) d y = 0.
M = y , N = 2 x − y e y . M y = 1 , N x = 2 . Exact nahi.
Case 1 try karo: N M y − N x = 2 x − y e y − 1 — abhi bhi x hai. ✗
Case 2 try karo: M N x − M y = y 2 − 1 = y 1 — pure y . ✓
μ = exp ( ∫ y 1 d y ) = y .
Multiply karo: M ∗ = y 2 , N ∗ = 2 x y − y 2 e y .
Check karo: M y ∗ = 2 y , N x ∗ = 2 y . ✓
F = ∫ y 2 d x = x y 2 + ϕ ( y ) . Phir F y = 2 x y + ϕ ′ ( y ) = 2 x y − y 2 e y , isliye
ϕ ′ ( y ) = − y 2 e y . Integration by parts se: ϕ = − e y ( y 2 − 2 y + 2 ) .
x y 2 − e y ( y 2 − 2 y + 2 ) = C .
Common mistake Multiply karne ke baad exactness re-test karna bhool jaana
Kyun sahi lagta hai: "Maine μ ka formula use kiya, toh ab exact hoga hi." Fix: formula tabhi kaam karta hai jab ratio genuinely single-variable function ho. Hamesha
M y ∗ = N x ∗ verify karo — ek quick sanity check jo arithmetic slips pakad leta hai.
x -formula use karna tab bhi jab ratio mein abhi bhi y ho
Kyun sahi lagta hai: tum blindly pehle N M y − N x compute karte ho. Fix: agar us ratio mein
y bacha ho, μ ( x ) exist nahi kar sakta ; y -test M N x − M y par switch karo. Numerator mein sign flip hoti hai — purani sign mat carry karo.
∫ M d x ke "constant" ko sach mein constant maanna
Kyun sahi lagta hai: single-variable integration mein constant sirf C hota hai. Fix: yahaan doosra variable frozen hai, isliye "constant" koi bhi function ϕ ( y ) ho sakta hai. Use drop karne se F ka y -only piece kho jaata hai (jaise upar wala − e y ( … ) term).
y -case numerator ki sign
μ μ ′ = M N x − M y hai, na ki M M y − N x . Kyun sahi lagta hai:
x -case ko mirror karna. Fix: yeh − M μ ′ = μ ( M y − N x ) se aata hai; minus doosri taraf jaata hai.
M y over N , N ext over M "
x -factor mein N M y − N x use hota hai (N se divide, x ka function chahiye — doosra letter).
y -factor mein M N x − M y use hota hai (M se divide, sign flip hoti hai).
Recall Feynman: explain to a 12-year-old
Ek pahadi socho jahan height F hai. Aise chalna ki teri height kabhi na badle matlab contour line par chalna — yahi solution hai. Kuch "chalne ke rules" (M d x + N d y ) kisi real pahadi ki contour ko bilkul trace nahi karte. Integrating factor μ aise magic glasses pehanne jaisa hai jo map ko rescale karte hain jab tak rule ek real pahadi se match na kare. Jab match ho jaata hai, tum bas contour padh lo:
"height C par raho."
M d x + N d y = 0 exact kab hoti hai?Jab M y = N x ho (tab ek potential F exist karta hai jisme F x = M , F y = N ho).
Exactness solution F = C kyun deti hai? Kyunki M d x + N d y = d F hai, aur d F = 0 ka matlab hai F solutions ke saath constant hai.
PDE jo integrating factor μ ko satisfy karni chahiye? N μ x − M μ y = μ ( M y − N x ) .
x -only integrating factor ke liye condition kya hai?N M y − N x sirf x ka function ho.
x -only factor ka formula kya hai?μ ( x ) = exp ∫ N M y − N x d x .
y -only factor ke liye condition aur formula kya hai?M N x − M y sirf y ka function ho; μ ( y ) = exp ∫ M N x − M y d y .
μ se multiply karna legitimate kyun hai?Yeh woh jagah nahi badlaata jahan expression zero hai (same solution curves), sirf form badlata hai.
μ se multiply karne ke baad kya karna zaroori hai?M y ∗ = N x ∗ re-verify karo, phir partial integration se F dhundho.
N mu_x - M mu_y = mu M_y-N_x