4.5.44 · D5 · HinglishLinear Algebra (Full)
Question bank — Subspaces — four fundamental subspaces of a matrix
4.5.44 · D5· Maths › Linear Algebra (Full) › Subspaces — four fundamental subspaces of a matrix
Shuru karne se pehle, do words jo hum baar baar use karte hain:
- hai — matlab rows (har output coordinate ke liye ek) aur columns (har input coordinate ke liye ek). To inputs mein entries hoti hain, outputs mein entries hoti hain.
- = row reduction ke baad pivots ki sankhya — dekho Rank of a Matrix aur RREF and Pivots.
True ya false — justify karo
Har claim ya to sahi hai ya subtly galat. Batao kaun sa hai, aur kyun.
Null space ek subspace hai ka.
True — ka matlab hai , aur mein entries hain (har column ke liye ek), isliye yeh input space mein rehta hai.
Column space ek subspace hai ka.
False — outputs mein entries hoti hain, isliye . Sirf row space aur null space mein rehte hain.
Agar ka sirf solution hai, to invertible hai.
Tabhi, jab square ho. Trivial null space ka matlab hai columns independent hain; ek square matrix ke liye yeh invertibility force karta hai, lekin ek tall () matrix ka ho sakta hai bina invertible hue.
Kisi bhi matrix ka row space aur column space same set hote hain.
False — unki dimension same hoti hai , lekin jabki , isliye jab tak na ho unhe compare bhi nahi kiya ja sakta. Dimension barabar, ghar alag.
Ek matrix jiska rank hai, uske null space ki dimension hai.
True — . Count columns () se karo, kabhi rows se nahi.
mein zeros ki ek row add karne se chaaron subspaces ki dimensions unchanged rehti hain.
, , ke liye True; ek zero row row space mein kuch nahi jorti aur rank nahi badlata, isliye ki dimension bhi rehti hai. Sirf 1 se badhta hai kyunki badh gaya.
Har vector jo ki saari rows ke saath orthogonal hai woh mein hota hai.
True — har row se orthogonality ka matlab hai har row-dot-, yaani sabhi ke liye, yaani . Yahi null space ki definition hai, aur yeh hai — dekho Orthogonal Complements.
Agar hai to ka exactly ek solution hai.
False — sirf kam se kam ek solution guarantee karta hai. Uniqueness ke liye chahiye; warna koi bhi null-space vector add karke bhi par pahuncha ja sakta hai. Dekho Solving Ax=b.
Left null space mein woh inputs hain jo zero par bheje jaate hain.
False — ; ye output-space vectors hain jo har column se orthogonal hain, aur woh directions mark karte hain jahan se unsolvable ho jaata hai.
Galti dhundho
Har line mein ek plausible-sounding claim hai jisme ek hidden mistake hai. Use naam do.
" ek subspace hai ka kyunki yeh ek straight line hai."
Galat — yeh origin miss karta hai: par milta hai. Ek line ko zero-vector rule satisfy karne ke liye se guzarna chahiye.
"Kyunki row rank = column rank hai, isliye row space column space ke barabar hai."
Equal dimension aur equal set ka confusion hai. Row rank column rank counts ke baare mein statement hai; spaces alag dimensions mein hote hain jab tak square na ho (aur tab bhi necessarily coincide nahi karte).
" hai rank ke saath, isliye ."
Galat subtraction — left null space use karta hai: . Plain null space use karta hai: .
" nikalne ke liye main RREF ke pivot columns leta hoon, kyunki woh independent hain."
Pivot columns original ke lo, RREF ke nahi. Row operations column space badal deti hain, isliye RREF columns galat set span karte hain; sirf pivot positions transfer hoti hain.
" aur orthogonal complements hain."
Yeh alag spaces mein rehte hain ( vs ) isliye complements nahi ho sakte. Sahi pairs hain ( mein) aur ( mein).
" ka rank mein nonzero rows ki sankhya ke barabar hai."
Nahi — nonzero rows row reduction to echelon form ke baad count karo, raw matrix mein nahi. Original rows dependent ho sakti hain (jaise row 2 row 1) aur phir bhi dono nonzero ho sakti hain.
"Agar ke do columns identical hain, to rank drop hota hai lekin null space trivial rehta hai."
Contradiction — identical columns dependent hain, isliye ek nonzero combination deta hai (un do columns par rakho). Woh vector mein hai, isliye .
Why questions
Mechanism se jawab do, restatement se nahi.
Ek subspace mein zero vector kyun hona zaruri hai?
Scalar multiplication ke under closure force karta hai: koi bhi aur scalar lo, to . Ek nonempty closed set origin se bach nahi sakti.
hamesha kyun hold karta hai?
pivot columns independent row-space directions dete hain aur free variables independent null directions dete hain; saath mein yeh saare input coordinates partition karte hain — yeh hai Rank–Nullity Theorem.
automatically ke columns ka combination kyun hota hai?
Kyunki : har input entry column ko scale karta hai. Isliye reachable outputs exactly hain.
se "for free" kyun aata hai?
ki har entry ek row ko ke saath dot karna hai. set karne ka matlab hai har row-dot-, isliye har row se perpendicular hai aur isliye unke pure span yaani row space se bhi.
Chaaron dimensions ki solvability aur uniqueness kyun determine karte hain?
Solvable (dimension batata hai reachable set kitna bada hai); unique (dimension batata hai kitne free directions add ho sakte hain). Solving Ax=b inhe saath baandhta hai.
Left null space least squares mein kyun useful hai?
Ek projection ka residual mein land karta hai; use wahan force karna exactly normal equation hai — dekho Least Squares & Projections.
Edge cases
Boundary aur degenerate inputs — reader ko koi unseen scenario mat dikhne do.
Zero matrix : uske chaaron subspaces kya hain?
, isliye , , (sab kuch crush ho jaata hai), (kuch bhi reachable nahi hai).
Ek invertible matrix: chaaron describe karo.
, isliye aur dono null spaces hain. Kuch crush nahi hota, har output reachable hai — machine ek perfect bijection hai.
Ek single row vector (so ): har subspace kaisa dikhta hai?
; (output space mein ek full line), , plane hai (dim ), kyunki .
Ek single column vector (so ): chaaron subspaces?
; ( mein ek line), (), , mein woh plane hai jo ke orthogonal hai, dim .
Kya null space aur left null space dono ho sakte hain ek non-square matrix ke liye?
Nahi — aur dono nahi ho sakte jab tak na ho, jo ek square (invertible) matrix force karta hai. Ek rectangular matrix mein hamesha kam se kam ek nontrivial null space hota hai.
Ek wide matrix jiska full row rank hai: kaun sa subspace forced nontrivial hai?
ki dimension hai, isliye infinitely many inputs kisi bhi reachable par map karte hain; lekin aur , isliye har output reachable hai.
Ek tall matrix jiska full column rank hai: kaun sa subspace forced nontrivial hai?
ki dimension hai, isliye kuch outputs unreachable hain (least-squares territory); lekin , isliye koi bhi solvable unique hai.
Agar hai, to kya orthogonality pairings phir bhi valid hain?
Haan — trivially aur yeh tak sum karte hain; Fundamental Theorem is degenerate case mein bhi hold karta hai jahan ek partner poora space hota hai.
Recall Ek-line self-test
Answers cover karo aur "Spot the error" block mein race karo: agar tum har ek mein mistake das second se kam mein naam de sako, to tumne input/output ( vs ) aur dimension (, , ) split internalize kar li hai.
Connections
- Subspaces — four fundamental subspaces of a matrix — woh parent jise yeh bank drill karta hai.
- Rank of a Matrix — woh number jis par har trap depend karta hai.
- Rank–Nullity Theorem — ka bookkeeping.
- Orthogonal Complements — kyun pairs perpendicular hain.
- Solving Ax=b — solvability aur uniqueness traps.
- RREF and Pivots — jahan se pivots (aur pivot-column error) aati hain.
- Least Squares & Projections — left-null-space ka application.