Addition aur scaling coefficient-wise hoti hai (yahi wajah hai ki P2 bilkul R3 jaisa behave karta hai).
2p=4+6x−2x2.2p−q=(4−(−1))+(6−1)x+(−2−4)x2=5+5x−6x2.
Coordinate vector: 55−6.
Recall Solution 2.2
R ke upar: scalars real hain, toh z=3⋅1+(−2)⋅i se coordinates milte hain (3−2).
C ke upar: scalars complex hain, ek basis vector {1} kaafi hai — z=(3−2i)⋅1, coordinate (3−2i). Scalar field badal deta hai ki "ek step" kya count hota hai, isliye dimRC=2 lekin dimCC=1. (Dekho Fields and scalars.)
+ ke liye closed: lo u=(x1,y1,z1),v=(x2,y2,z2) jahan har ek ka coordinate-sum 0 ho. Tab
(x1+x2)+(y1+y2)+(z1+z2)=(x1+y1+z1)+(x2+y2+z2)=0+0=0. Toh u+v∈W. ✓
Scaling ke liye closed:a⋅(x,y,z)=(ax,ay,az) aur ax+ay+az=a(x+y+z)=a⋅0=0. ✓
Teeno pass ho gaye, toh Wsubspace hai. (Geometrically yeh origin se guzarne wala ek plane hai; dimW=2.)
Recall Solution 3.2
Nahi. Sabse jaldi disqualifier zero test hai: (0,0,0) deta hai 0+0+0=0=1, toh 0∈/U. Yeh akela kaafi hai (Axiom 3 U ke andar fail hota hai).
Failure ko aur clearly dikhane ke liye, closure bhi fail hoti hai: (1,0,0)∈U aur (0,1,0)∈U hain, lekin unka sum (1,1,0) ka coordinate-sum 2=1 hai, toh (1,1,0)∈/U. Figure mein, plane U (coral) origin se hata hua hai; plane W (mint) origin se guzarta hai. Sirf origin se guzarne wale planes hi subspace ho sakte hain.
Haan — yeh disguise mein ek genuine vector space hai. Maange gaye axioms check karo.
Closure: positives ka product positive hota hai; koi bhi positive number kisi bhi real power mein positive hota hai. ✓
Axiom 3 (zero vector): humein e chahiye jiske liye x⊕e=x ho, yaani x⋅e=x, toh e=1. Zero vector hai 0=1. ✓
Axiom 4 (inverse): chahiye x⊕x′=1, yaani x⋅x′=1, toh x′=1/x (positive). Isliye yahan −v ka matlab hai 1/v. ✓
Axiom 5 (scalar identity):1⊙x=x1=x. ✓
Axiom 8 (scalar sum ke upar distribute karna):(a+b)⊙x=xa+b=xaxb=(a⊙x)⊕(b⊙x). ✓
(Baaki axioms bhi similarly check ho jaate hain.) Actually map x↦lnx⊕→+ aur ⊙→ ordinary scaling mein turn karta hai, jo R ke saath ek isomorphism hai — toh dimV=1, basis {e} (kyunki lne=1).
Recall Solution 4.2
Dono identities ko ek dusre ke against khelo.
0=0+0′(kyunki 0′ ek zero hai, ise v=0 par use karo)0+0′=0′+0(Axiom 1, commutativity)0′+0=0′(kyunki 0 ek zero hai, ise v=0′ par use karo)
Chaining: 0=0′. ■ Proof mein sirf axioms use hue, toh yeh har vector space mein valid hai.
(a) Har basis vector ko differentiate karo aur {1,x,x2} mein coordinates padhko:
D(1)=0,D(x)=1,D(x2)=2x.
Columns in outputs ke coordinate vectors hain:
[D]=000100020.(b)D(p)=0 ka matlab hai p′=0, toh p constant hai: kerD={a⋅1}=span{1}, dimkerD=1.
(c) Outputs p∈P2 ke liye p′ hain; degree ≤2 ke derivatives se degree ≤1 ke saare polynomials milte hain. Toh imD=P1=span{1,x}, dimimD=2.
(d) Rank–nullity: dimkerD+dimimD=1+2=3=dimP2. ✓
Recall Solution 5.2
Orthogonality:⟨sinx,cosx⟩=∫−ππsinxcosxdx. sinxcosx=21sin2x use karke,
∫−ππ21sin2xdx=21[−2cos2x]−ππ=21⋅(−2cos2π−cos(−2π))=0.
Toh sinx⊥cosx. ✓ (Iske alawa, integrand ek odd function hai, jo 0 force karta hai.)
Norm-squared:sin2x=21−cos2x use karke,
⟨sinx,sinx⟩=∫−ππ21−cos2xdx=21[x−2sin2x]−ππ=21(2π−0)=π.
Toh ∥sinx∥=π. Yeh orthogonal functions bilkul wahi building blocks hain Fourier series ke.