4.3.17 · D5 · HinglishCalculus III — Sequences & Series

Question bankMaclaurin series of eˣ, sin x, cos x, ln(1+x), (1+x)ⁿ — derive all

1,738 words8 min read↑ Read in English

4.3.17 · D5 · Maths › Calculus III — Sequences & Series › Maclaurin series of eˣ, sin x, cos x, ln(1+x), (1+x)ⁿ — deri


True or false — justify

Ek Maclaurin series hamesha us function ke barabar hoti hai jisse woh bani hai
False. Yeh function ke barabar sirf apne interval of convergence ke andar hoti hai; bahar, polynomial diverge kar jaati hai jabki function bilkul theek-thaak finite hoti hai (dekho jo se par milta hai). Figure s01 dekho — partial sums ke paas curve se chipki rehti hain aur phir alag ho jaati hain.
Har infinitely-differentiable function apni Maclaurin series ke barabar hoti hai ke paas
False. (jahan ) ke par saare derivatives zero hain, isliye uski Maclaurin series hai, lekin function nonzero hai — series sirf analytic functions ke liye sahi hoti hai. Figure s03 dikhata hai kyun: graph axis ke khilaf itni tezi se flatten ho jaata hai ki koi bhi polynomial detect nahi kar sakti.
ki series har real ke liye converge karti hai
True. Denominator kisi bhi fixed ke liye eventually se zyada badh jaata hai, isliye terms kaafi tezi se tak shrink ho jaate hain — radius of convergence infinite hai.
mein koi odd-power terms nahi hain kyunki woh addition ke dauran cancel ho jaate hain
False. Cancel karne ko kuch nahi hota — ke odd derivatives par literally hote hain (, etc.), isliye woh coefficients pehle se hi zero janam lete hain.
mein denominators hain
False. Woh factorials hain; chota dikhne wala bas likha hua hai, ek aasaan misread.
hamesha ek infinite series hota hai
False. ko term counter maan lo, to numerator mein factor aa jaata hai jab ho kisi non-negative integer ke liye, isliye baad ke saare zero ho jaate hain aur series terminate kar jaati hai — yahi ordinary binomial theorem hai.
Maclaurin series aur Taylor series alag-alag formulas hain
False. Maclaurin exactly Taylor series hai centre ke saath; same machinery, special base point.
Maclaurin series ko truncate karna hamesha ek over-estimate deta hai
False. Error ka sign agle term ke sign par depend karta hai. ke liye ke saath terms alternate karte hain, isliye partial sum oopar ya neeche ho sakta hai is baat par depend karte hue ki tum kahan ruke.

Spot the error

", isliye constant term hai."
Galat. Constant term hai; koi leading nahi hai. Series term se shuru hoti hai: .
"Ek Maclaurin series ke coefficients bas par derivatives hote hain: ."
miss ho gaya. Yahan upar di gayi definition se ka weight hai. Kyunki , surviving term hota hai, jisse milta hai.
""
Sign error. Geometric series ko ratio ke saath use karne par alternating signs milte hain: . All-plus wala version hai.
""
Quadratic term ka sign galat hai. Coefficient hai, isliye yeh hai — negative kyunki se negative ho jaata hai.
"Kyunki finite hai, main ise series mein plug karke compute kar sakta hoon."
Function value exist karti hai, lekin series sirf ke liye converge karti hai. par polynomial diverge kar jaati hai; tumhe ek alag centre ya identity chahiye hogi. Figure s02 is interval ko number line par dikhata hai.
" to ."
Sign placement galat hai. substitute karo: , jo alternate karta hai. Sirf odd terms ka sign badalta hai, har term uniformly nahi.
" ko term by term differentiate karne par milna chahiye; check karte hain: — lekin se shuru hota hai, contradiction."
Koi contradiction nahi: , isliye hi hai. Sine series ko differentiate karne par cosine series sahi tarike se reproduce hoti hai.

Why questions

Har derivative ko se divide kyun karte hain?
Kyunki ; divide kiye bina, piece ki jagah contribute karta, isliye hum compensate karte hain taaki coefficients derivatives se cleanly match karein.
rakhne par ek time mein ek coefficient kaise isolate ho jaata hai?
Har woh term jo abhi bhi contain karti hai, vanish ho jaati hai (), sirf us particular derivative ka constant term bachta hai — ek clean one-equation-one-unknown extraction.
"sabse clean" series derive karne kyun hai?
Kyunki , isliye par har derivative ke barabar hai; saare numerators same hain, sirf bachta hai.
mein sirf odd powers kyun hote hain?
ek odd function hai (), aur sirf odd-power monomials usi symmetry ko share karte hain; even-power coefficients zero hone chahiye taaki woh symmetry preserve ho sake.
ko repeated differentiation ki jagah geometric series integrate karke kyun derive karte hain?
Kyunki already ek known geometric series hai; ise term-by-term integrate karna logarithm ke higher derivatives compute karne se kaafi zyada clean hai.
series par converge kyun karti hai lekin par nahi?
par yeh alternating harmonic series ban jaati hai ( tak converge karti hai); par yeh negative harmonic series ban jaati hai, jo diverge karti hai — ko reflect karte hue. Figure s02 mein closed/open endpoints dekho.
Teen series , , ko combine karne par Euler's formula kyun milta hai?
mein substitute karne par terms parity ke hisaab se split ho jaate hain: real even-power terms rebuild karte hain aur imaginary odd-power terms rebuild karte hain, jisse milta hai.
Series [[L'Hôpital & limits via series|]] jaisi limit problems ko kyun speed up karti hain?
ki jagah rakho; phir turant mil jaata hai, koi repeated differentiation nahi chahiye.

Edge cases

jaisi kisi polynomial ki Maclaurin series kya hogi?
Woh polynomial khud hi hogi — ek finite series. Uske higher derivatives vanish ho jaate hain, isliye degree se aage ke saare coefficients zero hain; woh already "apni khud ki" series hai.
Boundary par, kya binomial series ke liye abhi bhi kaam karti hai?
finite hai aur series wahan ke liye converge karti hai, lekin endpoints par convergence delicate hoti hai aur ke sign par depend karti hai; safe interior guarantee hai (figure s02 mein shaded band).
mein jab ho to kya hota hai?
Function constant hai; series apne pehle term tak collapse ho jaati hai (yaad karo ka weight hai, aur yahan sirf bachta hai) aur aage ke saare coefficients zero hain — terminating integer case ke saath consistent.
Kya ki series sahi predict karti hai?
Haan. rakhne par har power term zero ho jaata hai, sirf constant bachta hai — built-in sanity check ki constant coefficient , ke barabar hota hai.
(bina ke) ki Maclaurin "series" kya hai?
Iski par centre ki hui koi series nahi hai: par undefined hai, isliye wahan koi derivatives exist nahi karte. Yahi wajah hai ki hum expand karte hain, mushkil ko par shift karte hue.
Agar bada ho lekin function well-behaved ho — maano ?
Series phir bhi converge karegi (infinite radius), lekin tumhe kaafi saare terms chahiye honge kyunki sirf tabhi shrink hona shuru hota hai jab ho; convergence guaranteed hai, necessarily fast nahi.

Recall Ek-line self-test

Upar ke saare answers cover karo aur teen jo tumhe sabse mushkil lage unhe dobara argue karo. Agar tumhara justification "kyunki formula yahi kehta hai" hai, to tumne ek aisa trap dhundha hai jo abhi tak defuse nahi hua — derivation note par wapas jao.