4.2.10 · D1 · Maths › Calculus II — Integration › Partial fractions — linear, repeated, irreducible quadratic
Ek badi mushkil polynomial fraction asal mein kuch simple fractions ko ek common denominator par add karke bani thi — aur addition reversible hai, isliye hum use un-add karke wapas unhi simple pieces mein tod sakte hain. Neeche har ek symbol do mein se ek sawaal ka jawaab deta hai: "woh simple pieces kya the?" ya "main har simple piece ko integrate kaise karunga?"
Isse pehle ki tum partial fractions ki machine par trust karo, tumhe har woh symbol samajhna hoga jo woh silently assume karti hai. Hum unhe ek-ek karke, bilkul scratch se build karte hain, har ek ek picture ke saath anchored hai.
Ek polynomial terms ka sum hota hai, jahan har term ek number ka x ke kisi whole-number power se product hota hai: jaise x 2 − x − 2 ya 3 x + 1 . Degree woh sabse bada power hai jo appear karta hai. Toh x 2 − x − 2 ki degree 2 hai; 3 x + 1 ki degree 1 hai; akela number jaise 7 ki degree 0 hai.
Degree ko "graph kitna curvy ho sakta hai" ki tarah socho: degree 1 ek seedhi line hai, degree 2 mein ek bend hai (ek parabola), aur zyada degree wale aur zyada wiggle karte hain.
Definition Rational function
Ek rational function ek polynomial ko doosre polynomial se divide karna hai: Q ( x ) P ( x ) . Yahan P (upar, numerator ) aur Q (neeche, denominator ) dono polynomials hain. Letters P aur Q sirf names hain — P upar ke particular polynomial ke liye, Q neeche ke ke liye.
deg
deg P ka shorthand hai "P ki degree". Toh deg ( 3 x + 1 ) = 1 . Hum deg P < deg Q likhte hain yeh kehne ke liye ki "upar wala neeche wale se kam curvy hai".
Intuition "Proper" kyun matter karta hai
Figure dekho. Jab upar ki degree neeche se choti ho (deg P < deg Q ), toh fraction x ke bahut bada hone par 0 ki taraf shrink karta hai — yeh proper hai. Jab upar utna hi curvy ya zyada curvy ho (deg P ≥ deg Q ), toh fraction bina bound ke badhta hai — yeh improper hai, aur koi bhi sum of shrinking proper pieces kabhi iske barabar nahi ho sakta. Yahi wajah hai ki recipe pehle proper input maangti hai.
Ek polynomial ko factor karna matlab hai usse chote polynomials ke product ke roop mein likhna, jaise x 2 − x − 2 ko ( x − 2 ) ( x + 1 ) mein todna. Product mein har piece ek factor hai. (Dekho Factoring polynomials over the reals .)
Ek polynomial ka root woh value of x hai jo usse 0 banata hai. ( x − 2 ) ka root x = 2 hai, kyunki x = 2 plug karne par 2 − 2 = 0 milta hai. Roots aur factors ek hi cheez ke do nazariye hain: ( x − a ) ek factor hai tabhi jab x = a ek root ho.
Definition Linear vs. quadratic factor
Ek linear factor ki degree 1 hoti hai: ( x − a ) . Iska graph zero par ek baar cross karta hai (ek root).
Ek quadratic factor ki degree 2 hoti hai: x 2 + b x + c . Yeh zero par do baar cross kar sakta hai, ek baar touch kar sakta hai, ya kabhi nahi.
Definition The discriminant
x 2 + b x + c ke liye discriminant yeh number hai b 2 − 4 c . Yeh ek sawaal ka jawaab deta hai: kya yeh quadratic real number line par zero ko hit karta hai?
b 2 − 4 c > 0 : do real roots → yeh do linear pieces mein factor ho jaata hai.
b 2 − 4 c = 0 : ek repeated real root.
b 2 − 4 c < 0 : koi real roots nahi → yeh irreducible hai (real linear factors mein nahi toda ja sakta).
Worked example Discriminant in action
x 2 + 1 mein b = 0 , c = 1 hai, toh discriminant = 0 2 − 4 ( 1 ) = − 4 < 0 → irreducible (axis ko kabhi nahi chhoota; figure mein pink curve dekho). Lekin x 2 − 5 x + 6 mein 25 − 24 = 1 > 0 → yeh ( x − 2 ) ( x − 3 ) ke roop mein factor hota hai, isliye isko apna quadratic template rakhne ki ijazat nahi hai.
Definition Repeated factor aur exponent
k
( x − a ) k ka matlab hai factor ( x − a ) ko k baar khud se multiply karna. Chhota raised number k ek exponent hai: ( x − 1 ) 2 = ( x − 1 ) ( x − 1 ) . Graphically, ek repeated root woh jagah hai jahan curve axis ko touch karta hai aur seedha cross karne ki bajaye wapas mud jaata hai.
Parent note mein repeated factors ko fractions ka poora stack diya jaata hai (x − a A 1 + ( x − a ) 2 A 2 + … ). Neeche Section 6 mein explain kiya gaya hai ki ek term kabhi kaafi kyun nahi hota.
Definition Unknown numerators
Letters A , B , C , … un numbers ke placeholders hain jo hum abhi nahi jaante . Partial fractions jawaab ko in unknowns se bhare ek template ke roop mein likhta hai, phir unhe solve karta hai. Subscripts jaise A 1 , A 2 sirf ek hi "family" ke kai unknowns ko number karte hain (ek repeated factor ke powers). Ek linear top B x + C ka matlab hai "koi unknown number B times x , plus koi unknown number C ".
∑
j = 1 ∑ m ka shorthand hai "inhe add karo, j ko 1 , 2 , … , m tak chalate hue". Toh ∑ j = 1 3 ( x − a ) j A j = x − a A 1 + ( x − a ) 2 A 2 + ( x − a ) 3 A 3 . Yeh ek lamba sum likhne ka sirf ek compact tarika hai.
Ek baar fraction split ho jaaye, toh har piece teen standard results mein se KISI EK se integrate hota hai. Yahan bataya gaya hai ki har tool kyun use hota hai, koi doosra nahi .
Definition Integral sign aur
d x
∫ f ( x ) d x poochta hai: "kaun sa function f ( x ) ko apni rate of change ke roop mein rakhta hai?" d x x ko woh variable naam deta hai jiske against hum integrate kar rahe hain. Trailing + C arbitrary constant hai (kisi bhi constant ki rate of change zero hoti hai, isliye differentiation ke liye yeh invisible hai).
Definition Substitution — glue tool
Integration by substitution hume integrand ke ek chunk ko single letter u rename karne deta hai, u mein integrate karta hai, phir wapas rename karta hai. Parent note iska use karta hai jab woh likhta hai ∫ x 2 + 1 x d x = 2 1 ln ( x 2 + 1 ) : u = x 2 + 1 set karo, toh upar ka x d x 2 1 d u ban jaata hai, poori cheez ko upar wale log integral mein badal deta hai.
Definition Completing the square
Completing the square x 2 + b x + c ko ( x + 2 b ) 2 + d 2 — ek perfect square plus ek bacha hua constant — ke roop mein rewrite karta hai. Kyun? Arctan tool ko exact shape ( stuff ) 2 + ( constant ) 2 chahiye. Completing the square kisi bhi irreducible quadratic ko us shape mein force kar deta hai taaki Tool 3 fire kar sake.
Intuition Numerator ki degree denominator se ek kam hoti hai
Ek common denominator par, ek single fraction ke top ki degree uske bottom se ek neeche tak hi ja sakti hai. Ek linear bottom ( x − a ) (degree 1 ) sirf ek constant top A (degree 0 ) allow karta hai. Ek quadratic bottom (degree 2 ) ek linear top B x + C (degree 1 ) allow karta hai. Yeh ek rule parent note mein har template generate karta hai — aur yahi wajah hai ki ek repeated factor ko missing freedom recover karne ke liye saare lower powers chahiye.
Discriminant tells irreducible
Khud ko test karo — har line jawaab reveal karti hai.
deg P < deg Q ka words mein kya matlab hai, aur split karne se pehle yeh kyun hold karna chahiye?Numerator denominator se kam curvy hai (proper); tabhi shrinking simple pieces uske barabar sum ho sakti hain.
x 2 + b x + c irreducible kab hota hai?Jab discriminant b 2 − 4 c < 0 ho (koi real roots nahi — parabola axis ko kabhi nahi chhoota).
x 2 − 5 x + 6 ka discriminant kya hai, aur yeh tumhe kya batata hai?25 − 24 = 1 > 0 , toh yeh ( x − 2 ) ( x − 3 ) mein factor hota hai — do linear pieces ki tarah treat karo, quadratic ki tarah nahi.
Ek quadratic factor ko numerator B x + C kyun milta hai, sirf A kyun nahi? Ek top apne bottom se ek degree neeche tak ja sakti hai; degree-2 bottom ek degree-1 top allow karta hai.
Kaun sa integral log deta hai, aur kyun? ∫ x − a 1 d x = ln ∣ x − a ∣ , kyunki ln defined hi us function ke roop mein hai jiska rate of change x 1 hai.
∫ ( x − a ) − 2 d x log ki jagah − ( x − a ) − 1 kyun deta hai?Log sirf exponent − 1 se aata hai; baaki har power ordinary power rule use karta hai.
Arctan kaam karne se pehle quadratic ko kaunsi shape mein force karna padta hai, aur kaise? ( x + 2 b ) 2 + d 2 , completing the square ke zariye, taaki square + const 1 match ho.
arctan kya jawaab deta hai?"Kaunse angle ki yeh tangent hai?" — yeh ek square + const 1 piece ko angle mein convert karta hai.
A 1 , A 2 mein subscript kya record karta hai?Ek repeated factor ke kaunse power se har unknown belong karta hai.