4.10.10 · Maths › Advanced Topics (Elite Level)
Ek vector kisi space mein rehta hai. Geometry karne ke liye (lengths, angles, dot products) tumhe ek ruler chahiye jo bataye ki measure kaise karna hai. Woh ruler hai metric tensor g μν .
KYA karta hai: usi vector ko describe karne ke do "dialects" ke beech convert karta hai — contravariant components V μ (upper indices ke saath) aur covariant components V μ (lower indices ke saath).
KYUN chahiye: non-Cartesian / curved / Minkowski spaces mein, V μ aur V μ genuinely alag numbers ki lists hoti hain. Dot product A ⋅ B , ∑ A μ B μ NAHI hai; yeh g μν A μ B ν hai. Metric hi dot product ko coordinate-independent banata hai.
KAISE : g μν se multiply karo to lower karo, aur iske inverse g μν se raise karo.
Definition Contravariant vs covariant
Tangent space ke liye ek basis { e μ } chuno.
Contravariant components V μ : woh numbers jo V = V μ e μ mein hain (sum implied). Yeh basis ke opposite transform hote hain — basis ko chhota karo, components bade ho jaate hain.
Covariant components V μ : woh numbers jo dual/reciprocal basis se project karke milte hain. Yeh basis ke saath transform hote hain.
Plain Cartesian coordinates mein orthonormal axes ke saath dono same hote hain, isliye school mein kabhi mention nahi hote.
Intuition "Opposite" naming kyun?
Units metres se centimetres mein badlo. Ek basis vector e x ("ek unit east") chhota ho jaata hai (1 cm < 1 m). Lekin ek fixed physical displacement mein unki ginti badi ho jaati hai (300 cm vs 3 m). Components basis ke contra (ulte) vary karte hain — isliye contra variant, upper index.
g μν ≡ e μ ⋅ e ν
Yeh ek symmetric (g μν = g ν μ ) rank-2 tensor hai jo basis vectors ke har pairwise dot product store karta hai. Inverse metric g μν yeh satisfy karta hai
g μα g α ν = δ μ ν ( Kronecker delta ) .
KYUN yeh sahi object hai. V = V μ e μ ki squared length hai
∥ V ∥ 2 = V ⋅ V = ( V μ e μ ) ⋅ ( V ν e ν ) = V μ V ν ( e μ ⋅ e ν ) = g μν V μ V ν .
Har step sirf dot product ki bilinearity hai. Toh g μν uss moment humpe forced ho jaata hai jab hum components se lengths chahte hain.
Derivation.
V μ = V ⋅ e μ = ( V ν e ν ) ⋅ e μ = V ν ( e ν ⋅ e μ ) = g μν V ν .
Raising. Dono sides ko g α μ se multiply karo aur g α μ g μν = δ α ν use karo:
g α μ V μ = g α μ g μν V ν = δ α ν V ν = V α .
Mnemonic "g matching index khaata hai, naya wala deta hai"
Metric Down, Lower Down — down indices wala g lower karta hai. Up indices wala g (g μν ) raise karta hai. Repeated (summed) index hamesha ek baar up, ek baar down aata hai.
Ek baar mein ek index raise/lower karo, g se contract karke:
T μ ν = g ν α T μα , T μν = g ν β T μ β , R μν = g α β R μα ν β .
KYUN ek ek karke: g ki har application ek free index ko dummy ke saath pair karti hai, exactly usi slot ko convert karti hai.
Ek neat consistency check: lower karo phir raise karo to original wapas milna chahiye.
g μ β ( g β ν V ν ) = ( g μ β g β ν ) V ν = δ μ ν V ν = V μ . ✓
Worked example (a) Minkowski spacetime, signature
( − , + , + , + )
g μν = diag ( − 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 ) . 4-velocity components lo U μ = ( 2 , 1 , 0 , 0 ) .
U 0 = g 0 ν U ν = g 00 U 0 = ( − 1 ) ( 2 ) = − 2 . Kyun? Diagonal metric ⇒ sirf ν = 0 survive karta hai.
U 1 = g 11 U 1 = ( 1 ) ( 1 ) = 1 .
Toh U μ = ( − 2 , 1 , 0 , 0 ) . Time component ka sign flip hua — yahi indefinite metric ka poora point hai.
Norm: U μ U μ = ( − 2 ) ( 2 ) + ( 1 ) ( 1 ) + 0 + 0 = − 3. Coordinate-independent length, timelike vectors ke sahi sign convention ke saath.
Worked example (b) 2D polar coordinates
Line element d s 2 = d r 2 + r 2 d θ 2 ⇒ g μν = ( 1 0 0 r 2 ) , toh g μν = ( 1 0 0 1/ r 2 ) .
Covariant V μ = ( V r , V θ ) diya, raise karo:
V r = g r r V r = V r .
V θ = g θ θ V θ = V θ / r 2 . 1/ r 2 kyun? θ -basis vector e θ ki length r hai, 1 nahi; metric usse correct karta hai.
Worked example (c) Off-diagonal metric
g μν = ( 1 1 1 2 ) , V μ = ( 3 , 1 ) .
V 1 = g 1 ν V ν = g 11 V 1 + g 12 V 2 = ( 1 ) ( 3 ) + ( 1 ) ( 1 ) = 4.
V 2 = g 21 V 1 + g 22 V 2 = ( 1 ) ( 3 ) + ( 2 ) ( 1 ) = 5.
Dono terms kyun include kiye? Off-diagonal g 12 = 0 components ko couple karta hai — cross terms ko ignore nahi kar sakte .
V μ aur V μ same list hain, bas alag likhe gaye hain."
Kyun sahi lagta hai: Cartesian orthonormal coordinates mein g μν = δ μν , toh woh hain equal — yahi sabka pehla experience hota hai.
Fix: woh equal hote hain sirf tab jab g = 1 . Polar, Minkowski, ya kisi bhi curved space mein woh alag numbers hote hain. Hamesha pehle metric check karo.
Common mistake Dot product
= ∑ μ A μ B μ .
Kyun sahi lagta hai: jaana-pahchana Euclidean formula.
Fix: invariant hai A μ B μ = g μν A μ B ν . Summed pair ek up, ek down hona chahiye. Do ups (ya do downs) valid contraction nahi hai.
g μν se raise karna.
Kyun sahi lagta hai: "metric index gymnastics karta hai, toh sab ke liye use karo."
Fix: down-indexed g μν lower karta hai; raise karne ke liye tumhe inverse g μν chahiye. Yeh tab tak different hote hain jab tak g apna khud ka inverse na ho.
Recall Feynman: 12-saal ke bache ko samjhao
Socho ek treasure map stretchy rubber pe bana hai. Treasure kahan hai yeh batane ke liye tum ya toh steps ginoge ("3 east, 2 north") ya describe karoge ki yeh har direction ke saath kitna align karta hai. Flat un-stretched map pe dono descriptions same numbers dete hain. Lekin agar rubber ek direction mein zyada stretched hai, toh dono descriptions alag hogi — aur tumhe ek choti "stretch table" (the metric) chahiye ek ko doosre mein translate karne ke liye. Index lower karna = stretch table use karo; raise karna = undo table use karo.
Recall Active recall checkpoint
g μν ko basis vectors ke terms mein define karo.
V μ = g μν V ν bina dekhe derive karo.
Inverse metric kyun indices raise karta hai?
diag ( − 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 ) aur U μ = ( 2 , 1 , 0 , 0 ) ke liye, U μ nikalo.
Metric tensor g μν kaise define hota hai? Basis vectors ka dot product, g μν = e μ ⋅ e ν ; ek symmetric rank-2 tensor.
Index lower karne ka formula? V μ = g μν V ν .
Index raise karne ka formula? V μ = g μν V ν , jahan g μν inverse metric hai.
g μν aur g μν ke beech defining relation?g μα g α ν = δ μ ν (yeh matrix inverses hain).
V μ aur V μ generally alag kyun hote hain?Woh equal hote hain sirf jab g μν = δ μν (orthonormal Cartesian); warna metric non-trivial hai aur components ko rescale/mix karta hai.
A aur B ka invariant dot product?A μ B μ = g μν A μ B ν (ek up, ek down index sum hua).
Minkowski ( − , + , + , + ) mein, time index lower karne se kya hota hai? Sign flip ho jaata hai: V 0 = − V 0 .
Polar metric aur V θ se V θ ? g θ θ = r 2 , g θ θ = 1/ r 2 , toh V θ = V θ / r 2 .
Dot product A.B = g_mu_nu A^mu B^nu