4.1.26 · D3 · Maths › Calculus I — Limits & Derivatives › L'Hôpital's rule — proof using linear approximation, 0 - 0,
Yeh page drill floor hai. parent note mein rule aur uska proof banaya gaya tha; yahan hum har tarah ki problem solve karte hain jo rule ko face karni pad sakti hai, taaki koi bhi exam tumhe surprise na kar sake. Agar koi symbol naya lage, toh parent note ya Indeterminate Forms mein uski definition milegi.
Intuition "Scenario" ka matlab yahan kya hai
Ek limit ek mushkil ki shape hoti hai. 0 0 ek shape hai, ∞ − ∞ doosri, 1 ∞ teesri. Har shape ka apna pehla kadam hota hai — L'Hôpital use karne se pehle. Neeche ka matrix har shape aur uska pehla kadam list karta hai; examples phir har cell ko walk karte hain.
Neeche ki har problem is grid ka ek cell hai. "Direct" ka matlab hai L'Hôpital bina kisi setup ke apply hota hai; "Convert" ka matlab hai pehle use fraction ki shape mein reshape karna hoga.
Cell
Form
Pehla kadam (KYU)
Example
A
0 0 direct
already do zeros ka fraction hai
(1)
B
0 0 repeated
naya limit phir bhi 0 0 hai, dobara apply karo
(2)
C
∞ ∞ direct
growth race, speeds compare karo
(3)
D
0 ⋅ ∞ convert
f ⋅ g = 1/ g f likhkar convert karo
(4)
E
∞ − ∞ convert
common denominator subtraction khatam kar deta hai
(5)
F
1 ∞ (log)
ln lo, exponent neeche aa jaata hai
(6)
G
0 0 (log)
ln lo, exponent ek product ban jaata hai
(7)
H
trap: looping
rule hamesha cycle karta hai → algebra use karo
(8)
I
word problem
pehle limit khud banao, phir solve karo
(9)
J
exam twist: one-sided sign
approach ka sign decide karta hai ± ∞
(10)
Notation reminder, pehle samjho phir use karo:
x → a lim padho "jab x creep karta hai a ki taraf, expression us value ki taraf jaata hai " — dekho Limits — Definition & Laws .
f ′ ( x ) derivative hai: change ki instantaneous rate, tangent line ki slope — dekho Linear Approximation & Tangent Lines .
x → 0 + matlab x , 0 ke paas right side se jaata hai (sirf positive values); x → 0 − matlab left side se.
x → 0 lim x 3 tan x − x
Forecast: padhne se pehle guess karo — kya yeh 0 hai, ek finite nonzero number, ya ∞ ? (Upar ki subtraction hint deti hai ki numerator tiny hai, x se bhi tiny, lekin shayad x 3 se comparable.)
Form check karo. x = 0 par: tan 0 − 0 = 0 upar, 0 3 = 0 neeche. Toh 0 0 . ✔
Yeh step kyun? L'Hôpital tab tak kabhi apply nahi karte jab tak confirm na ho ki dono parts 0 hit karte hain (ya dono ∞ ).
Top aur bottom ko alag-alag differentiate karo. d x d ( tan x − x ) = sec 2 x − 1 , aur d x d x 3 = 3 x 2 . Naya limit: 3 x 2 sec 2 x − 1 .
Yeh step kyun? Parent ka proof kehta hai ratio, speeds ke ratio ke barabar hai; woh hai g ′ f ′ , quotient rule nahi .
Abhi bhi 0 0 ? 0 par: sec 2 0 − 1 = 1 − 1 = 0 , bottom 0 . Haan → dobara apply karo. d x d ( sec 2 x − 1 ) = 2 sec 2 x tan x , bottom 6 x : 6 x 2 sec 2 x tan x .
Kyun? Nayi 0 0 matlab rule reuse karne ka naya license.
Phir bhi 0 0 . Split karo: 6 x 2 sec 2 x tan x = 3 sec 2 x ⋅ x tan x . Hum jaante hain x t a n x → 1 aur sec 2 0 = 1 , toh limit = 3 1 .
Teesra L'Hôpital lagane ki jagah factor kyun? Ek jaani-pahchani limit ko pehchanna zyada saaf hota hai aur messy derivatives se bachata hai.
Verify: Taylor deta hai tan x = x + 3 x 3 + ⋯ , toh tan x − x ≈ 3 x 3 , aur x 3 se divide karne par 3 1 milta hai. ✔ (dekho Taylor Series )
x → 0 lim x 2 e x − 1 − x
Forecast: upar hai "e x minus uski apni linear approximation" — line hatane ke baad kya bachta hai? Value guess karo.
Form: e 0 − 1 − 0 = 0 ; bottom 0 . 0 0 ✔.
Pehla L'Hôpital: top′ = e x − 1 , bottom′ = 2 x → 2 x e x − 1 . Kyun? Wahi speed-ratio principle.
Abhi bhi 0 0 (e 0 − 1 = 0 ). Dobara apply karo: 2 e x → 2 e 0 = 2 1 .
Dobara kyun? Har nayi 0 0 rule reset kar deti hai; ruko tabhi jab determined value mile.
Verify: e x = 1 + x + 2 x 2 + ⋯ , toh e x − 1 − x ≈ 2 x 2 ; x 2 se divide karne par 2 1 . ✔
Figure dekho: isme numerator aur denominator dono ∞ ki taraf race kar rahe hain, lekin bilkul alag rates par.
x → ∞ lim e x x 2
Forecast: kaun jeetta hai — polynomial ya exponential? 0 , 1 , ya ∞ guess karo.
Form: jab x → ∞ , top → ∞ , bottom → ∞ . ∞ ∞ ✔.
Pehla L'Hôpital: e x 2 x . Abhi bhi ∞ ∞ .
Kyun? Differentiate karne se polynomial ki power har baar ek kam ho jaati hai, lekin exponential kabhi nahi shrinkta — dekho Exponential & Logarithm Growth Rates .
Doosra: e x 2 → 0 . Kyun rukein? Numerator ab ek constant hai, denominator → ∞ , toh determined 0 milta hai.
Verify: figure mein red curve e x , x 2 ko overtake karke aage nikal jaata hai — ratio x -axis ki taraf flatten ho jaata hai. Numerically x = 10 par: e 10 100 ≈ 0.0045 . ✔
x → 0 + lim x ln x
Forecast: x → 0 lekin ln x → − ∞ . Ek tug of war — kaun jeetega?
Form: 0 ⋅ ( − ∞ ) . Fraction nahi hai, toh L'Hôpital abhi tak ise touch nahi kar sakta.
Convert karo. "∞ " wala piece upar rakho: x ln x = 1/ x ln x = x − 1/2 ln x , ab ∞ − ∞ .
Yeh split kyun? ln x ko upar rakhne par ek easy derivative 1/ x milta hai; doosra split (x upar, 1/ ln x neeche) horrible denominator bana deta hai. Woh split chuno jo simplify kare.
L'Hôpital: top′ = x 1 , bottom′ = − 2 1 x − 3/2 . Ratio = − 2 1 x − 3/2 1/ x = − 2 x 1/2 = − 2 x → 0 .
Verify: x = 0.0001 par: 0.0001 ln ( 0.0001 ) = 0.01 × ( − 9.21 ) ≈ − 0.092 , already 0 ki taraf crawl kar raha hai. ✔
x → 0 lim ( sin x 1 − x 1 )
Forecast: 0 ke paas dono pieces + ∞ tak blow up karte hain. Unka difference finite ho sakta hai — guess karo.
Form: jab x → 0 + , s i n x 1 → ∞ aur x 1 → ∞ , toh ∞ − ∞ . Indeterminate.
Ek fraction mein convert karo (common denominator): x sin x x − sin x .
Kyun? Ek single fraction subtraction ko clean 0 0 mein badal deta hai (top → 0 , bottom → 0 ), jise rule kha sakta hai.
L'Hôpital: top′ = 1 − cos x , bottom′ = sin x + x cos x → sin x + x cos x 1 − cos x . Abhi bhi 0 0 .
Dobara: top′ = sin x , bottom′ = 2 cos x − x sin x → 2 cos x − x sin x sin x → 2 0 = 0 .
Verify: Taylor: x − sin x ≈ 6 x 3 aur x sin x ≈ x 2 , ratio ≈ 6 x → 0 . ✔
x → 0 + lim ( cos x ) 1/ x 2
Forecast: base → 1 , exponent → ∞ . Ek 1 ∞ — answer 1 hai, e hai, ya 1 se kam kuch?
Form: cos 0 = 1 , exponent 1/ x 2 → ∞ . 1 ∞ — indeterminate kyunki "1 -ish ko bahut bade power par raise karna" kuch bhi ho sakta hai.
ln lo. Maano y = ( cos x ) 1/ x 2 , tab ln y = x 2 ln ( cos x ) .
ln kyun? Exponents differentiation ke liye tab tak invisible hote hain jab tak ln unhe neeche product/quotient mein na kheeche — parent Example (5) dekho.
ln y ki form: ln ( cos 0 ) = ln 1 = 0 , x 2 = 0 se divide: 0 0 . L'Hôpital: top′ = cos x − sin x = − tan x , bottom′ = 2 x → 2 x − tan x → − 2 1 (tan x / x → 1 use karke).
Log undo karo. ln y → − 2 1 ⇒ y → e − 1/2 = e 1 .
Exponentiate kyun? Humne ln y solve kiya tha; original limit e ( l n y ) hai.
Verify: e − 1/2 ≈ 0.6065 . x = 0.1 par: ( cos 0.1 ) 100 = ( 0.995004 ) 100 ≈ 0.6062 . ✔
x → 0 + lim x x
Forecast: base → 0 (0 ki taraf kheechta hai), exponent → 0 (1 ki taraf kheechta hai). Kaun jeetta hai?
Form: 0 0 — indeterminate tug of war.
ln lo. y = x x ⇒ ln y = x ln x . Yeh Cell D hai, form 0 ⋅ ( − ∞ ) .
Convert & solve. x ln x = 1/ x ln x , form ∞ − ∞ . L'Hôpital: − 1/ x 2 1/ x = − x → 0 .
1/ x split kyun? Wahi reason jaise Example 4 mein — ln x ka easy derivative upar rakhta hai.
Log undo karo. ln y → 0 ⇒ y → e 0 = 1 .
Verify: x = 0.01 par: 0.0 1 0.01 = e 0.01 l n 0.01 = e − 0.046 ≈ 0.955 , 1 ki taraf climb kar raha hai. ✔
x → ∞ lim x x 2 + 1
Forecast: bade x ke liye, x 2 + 1 ≈ x . Value guess karo.
Form: ∞ ∞ ✔ — toh L'Hôpital allowed hai, lekin dekho kya hota hai.
L'Hôpital try karo: top′ = x 2 + 1 x , bottom′ = 1 → x 2 + 1 x . Yeh original ka reciprocal hai — dobara apply karne par wapis flip ho jaata hai. Infinite loop.
Loop kyun hota hai? Rule require karta hai ki RHS limit exist kare aur simplify ho ; yahan kabhi simplify nahi hota.
Algebra se theek karo. Root ke andar x se divide karo: x x 2 + 1 = x 2 x 2 + 1 = 1 + x 2 1 → 1 = 1 .
Yahan algebra rule se behtar kyun hai? Factoring woh hidden structure reveal karta hai jise derivative chupaata raha.
Verify: x = 1000 par: 1000001 /1000 ≈ 1.0000005 . ✔
Common mistake "Rule hamesha kaam karta hai"
Galat belief: agar form ∞ ∞ hai, L'Hôpital marte raho.
Yeh sahi kyun lagta hai: form check pass ho gaya. Fix: agar ratio cycle kare ya simplify na ho, toh RHS limit reach nahi ho rahi — ruko aur algebra use karo .
Worked example Continuous compounding
Ek bank annual rate r deta hai lekin saal mein n baar compound karta hai, toh $1 ek saal baad ( 1 + n r ) n ban jaata hai. Kya hoga jab compounding continuous ho jaaye, n → ∞ ?
Forecast: infinite compounding — kya tumhara dollar ∞ tak explode hoga, ya kisi finite number par settle karega?
Limit set up karo. Hum chahte hain n → ∞ lim ( 1 + n r ) n .
Kyun? "Continuous" = compounding steps ki sankhya → ∞ ; woh hi limit hai.
Form: base → 1 , exponent → ∞ : 1 ∞ (Cell F). ln lo: ln y = n ln ( 1 + n r ) , form ∞ ⋅ 0 .
Convert: ln y = 1/ n ln ( 1 + r / n ) , 0 0 . n mein L'Hôpital: top′ = 1 + r / n − r / n 2 , bottom′ = − n 2 1 . Ratio = 1 + r / n r → r .
Log undo karo. ln y → r ⇒ y → e r .
Exponentiate kyun? Dollar ki value y hai, ln y nahi.
Verify: r = 1 ke saath yeh parent ka Example (5) hai, jo deta hai e 1 = e ≈ 2.71828 . Units: dollars per dollar (dimensionless growth factor). ✔
x → 0 ± lim x 3 sin x — dono sides treat karo
Forecast: yeh 0 0 hai, lekin answer ek single number nahi ho sakta. Dono sides kyun disagree kar sakti hain?
Form: sin 0 = 0 , 0 3 = 0 : 0 0 ✔.
L'Hôpital: 3 x 2 cos x . Ab top → cos 0 = 1 = 0 , bottom → 0 + (kyunki x 2 > 0 x ke kisi bhi sign ke liye).
Bottom ka sign kyun note karein? 3 x 2 hamesha positive hai, toh fraction + tiny + 1 = + ∞ hai dono sides se.
Both-sided conclusion: x → 0 lim x 3 sin x = + ∞ .
Twist kyun matter karta hai: agar denominator x 3 hota bina L'Hôpital step ke, toh uska sign flip ho jaata (x 3 < 0 left, > 0 right) — lekin ek differentiation ke baad denominator x 2 ban gaya, jo sign-blind hai. Har step ke baad sign hamesha recheck karo.
Contrast case. x → 0 lim x 2 sin x ke liye: L'Hôpital deta hai 2 x cos x , aur 2 x ka sign flip hota hai: → + ∞ right se, → − ∞ left se → two-sided limit exist nahi karta .
Verify: x = ± 0.01 par: sin ( 0.01 ) / ( 0.01 ) 3 ≈ 0.01/1 0 − 6 = 1 0 4 > 0 dono sides. ✔ Aur sin ( 0.01 ) / ( 0.01 ) 2 ≈ + 100 , jabki sin ( − 0.01 ) / ( − 0.01 ) 2 ≈ − 100 — opposite signs confirm karte hain ki koi two-sided limit nahi hai. ✔
Recall Answers cover karo
L'Hôpital se pehle tumhe hamesha kya karna chahiye? ::: Confirm karo ki form 0 0 ya ∞ ∞ hai.
lim x → ∞ x 2 / e x = ? ::: 0 (exponential kisi bhi polynomial ko beat karta hai).
lim x → 0 + x x = ? ::: 1 .
lim x → 0 + ( cos x ) 1/ x 2 = ? ::: e − 1/2 .
Jab rule loop kare (Example 8), toh kya karo? ::: Chhod do aur algebra use karo.
lim x → 0 sin x / x 2 kyun exist nahi karta jabki sin x / x 3 deta hai + ∞ ? ::: L'Hôpital ke baad denominators hain 2 x (sign flip hota hai) vs 3 x 2 (hamesha positive).
Mnemonic Paanch pehle kadam
"Direct, Repeat, Convert, Log, ya Algebra." Is order mein pucho: kya pehle se hi 0 0 /∞ ∞ hai? ek step ke baad bhi? fraction chahiye (0 ⋅ ∞ , ∞ − ∞ )? ln chahiye (1 ∞ , 0 0 , ∞ 0 )? ya loop ho raha hai (algebra use karo)?
L'Hôpital's rule — proof using linear approximation, 0 - 0, ∞ - ∞, other indeterminate forms (index 4.1.26) — parent: rule aur uska proof.
Indeterminate Forms — matrix mein listed trouble ki saaton shapes.
Taylor Series — har "Verify" leading terms ke zariye yahan hai.
Exponential & Logarithm Growth Rates — Examples 3, 4, 6, 7 growth races hain.
Limits — Definition & Laws — one-sided limits aur ± ∞ (Example 10).
Linear Approximation & Tangent Lines — f ′ / g ′ sahi ratio kyun hai.