Jab aap x→a ko g(x)f(x) mein plug karte hain aur 00 ya ∞∞ milta hai, toh expression indeterminate hai — value sirf form se determine nahi hoti. Compare karo:
Yeh "Feynman / derivation-from-scratch" wala view hai. 00 case lo jahan f(a)=g(a)=0 ho (continuity se define karo unhe).
Step 1 — Near a linearise karo. Kisi point ke paas, ek differentiable function apni tangent line jaisi dikhti hai:
f(x)≈f(a)+f′(a)(x−a),g(x)≈g(a)+g′(a)(x−a).Yeh step kyun? Derivatives ki poori power yahi hai ki curve apni tangent line hai first order par — error (x−a) se bhi tezi se vanish ho jaati hai.
Step 2 — f(a)=g(a)=0 use karo. Constant terms mar jaate hain:
g(x)f(x)≈g′(a)(x−a)f′(a)(x−a)=g′(a)f′(a).Yeh step kyun?(x−a) factors shared "smallness" hain. Yeh cancel ho jaate hain, ratio of speeds bach jaata hai.
Linear-approximation argument secretly assume karta hai ki f′,g′ continuous hain. Airtight proof Cauchy MVT use karta hai: f,g ke liye [a,x] par ek c∈(a,x) hota hai jahan
g(x)−g(a)f(x)−f(a)=g′(c)f′(c).f(a)=g(a)=0 ke saath yeh g(x)f(x)=g′(c)f′(c) ban jaata hai. Jaise x→a hota hai, c squeeze hokar a par aa jaata hai, toh limits match karti hain. Yeh kyun stronger hai: derivatives ki continuity ki zaroorat nahi.
Kon si do forms par directly apply kar sakte ho? ::: 00 aur ∞∞.
Kya tum quotient rule use karte ho? ::: Nahi — numerator aur denominator ko alag-alag differentiate karo.
00 ko kaise handle karte ho? ::: ln lo, 0⋅∞ mein convert karo, phir 0/0 mein.
Conclusion hold karne ke liye kya true hona chahiye? ::: f′/g′ ki limit exist karni chahiye (ya ±∞ honi chahiye).
Recall Feynman: 12-saal ke bacche ko explain karo
Do ghonge ek hi line se start karte hain aur hum poochhte hain "thodi der baad kaun aage hoga?" Kyunki dono ne zero se start kiya, sirf ek cheez decide karti hai — kaun kitna tezi se chhalta hai — wahi slope hai, derivative hai. Toh unke tiny distances compare karne ki jagah (jo dono practically zero hain — confusing!), hum sirf unki speeds compare karte hain. Yahi swap, distances → speeds, L'Hôpital's rule hai.