4.1.22 · D5 · HinglishCalculus I — Limits & Derivatives
Question bank — Implicit differentiation — technique, applications
4.1.22 · D5· Maths › Calculus I — Limits & Derivatives › Implicit differentiation — technique, applications
True or false — justify
Ek differentiated equation mein har -term ke saath ka factor hota hai.
True — Chain Rule ke according, wali kisi bhi cheez ko ke w.r.t. differentiate karne par "toll" milta hai, kyunki ki ke respect mein inside-rate-of-change hai, nahi.
Ek implicit equation hamesha exactly ek function define karta hai.
False — do branches define karta hai (upper aur lower semicircle); implicit differentiation quietly us whichever branch ko handle karta hai jis par tumhara point hai, kyunki mein ke sign se correct sign aa jaata hai.
Agar tum equation ko explicitly ke liye solve kar sako, toh implicit differentiation alag derivative deta hai.
False — kyunki dono methods same curve describe karte hain, toh har point par unhe same slope dena hi chahiye; implicit answer bas mixed form mein likha hota hai. Circle ki top branch par, mein substitute karne par exactly milta hai — wohi explicit derivative — toh dono line-for-line agree karte hain.
Formula curve par har jagah kaam karta hai.
False — jahan hoga wahan fail ho jaata hai (division by zero); precisely wahi pe tangent vertical hoti hai aur Implicit Function Theorem ko ka function guarantee nahi karta.
Ek true equation ko ke w.r.t. differentiate karne par woh true equation reh jaata hai.
True — dono sides ki equal functions hain, toh unke derivatives bhi equal hain; isi wajah se hum dono sides ko ek saath differentiate kar sakte hain, constants aur sab kuch.
ki tangent line par se slope milti hai.
False — par se divide karna padega; tangent vertical hai (undefined slope), jo formula blowing up karke dikhata hai, koi number dene ki jagah.
Logarithmic differentiation implicit differentiation se alag rule hai.
False — Logarithmic Differentiation is implicit differentiation hai jo par apply hota hai; left side par sirf par chain-rule toll hai.
Ek implicit curve ka second derivative final answer mein legitimately contain kar sakta hai.
False — ko sirf position ka function hona chahiye, taaki tum ek point plug karke number pa sako; lekin koi independent quantity nahi hai — woh khud known expression hai. ko chhodna matlab tumhara answer secretly abhi bhi ek unevaluated derivative contain karta hai, toh woh ka usable function nahi hai abhi — use substitute karna hi use ek banata hai.
Spot the error
"." — kya galat hai?
Chain-rule toll missing hai; ek function of hai, toh hoga, nahi. Ye sirf isliye jaisa lagta hai kyunki dono squares hain.
"." — kya galat hai?
do functions ka product hai, toh Product Rule lagega: . ko "ek lump" maanna dono terms ko throw away kar deta hai.
"." — kya galat hai?
Constant ki rate of change zero hoti hai, toh ; equation ka balance exactly isliye preserve hota hai kyunki constants vanish ho jaate hain.
" ke liye, pehle ke liye solve karo, phir differentiate karo." — kya galat hai?
Tum ko closed form mein ke liye solve nahi kar sakte, toh differentiate karne ke liye koi explicit cheez hai hi nahi; implicit differentiation hi ek available route hai.
"." — kya galat hai?
Outer chain rule sirf aadha hua hai — tumhe se multiply karna hoga, jo deta hai . Inside ka function hai, toh uska derivative nahi hai.
" bhi valid hai." — kya galat hai?
ki range, yaani , par hota hai, toh sirf positive root correct hai: , domain par valid (dekho Derivatives of Inverse Functions).
", power rule use karo: ." — kya galat hai?
Power rule ko constant exponent chahiye; yahan exponent variable hai, toh rule apply nahi hota. Pehle log lo: , jisse milta hai.
" milne ke baad, step bachane ke liye pehle plug in karo solve karne se pehle." — kya galat hai?
Tum point pehle plug in kar sakte ho, lekin isolate karna abhi bhi zaroori hai: se milta hai; isolation skip karna undetermined chhod deta hai.
Why questions
ko toll factor kyun milta hai lekin ko nahi?
Kyunki hum ke respect mein differentiate kar rahe hain: apne aap ke saath rate par change hota hai (), jabki rate par change hota hai, jo ek unknown hai jise hum solve kar rahe hain.
Implicit differentiation "branches se free" kyun hai?
Hum curve ko aur mein split nahi karte; ek single formula automatically point ki -value ke sign se sahi sign carry karta hai, dono branches ek saath cover karta hai (neeche branch figure dekho).

ke hold karne ke liye kyun zaroori hai?
matlab curve locally vertical hai, toh ko wahan ka function nahi likha ja sakta (Implicit Function Theorem); zero se division algebra ka warning hai ki vertical tangent hai.
ke liye differentiate karne se pehle log kyun lete hain?
exponents ko multipliers mein aur products ko sums mein convert karta hai (), ek aisi case ko jo koi elementary rule cover nahi karta, ek aise product mein badal deta hai jo Product Rule handle kar sakta hai.
Arcsin derivative formula lookup ki jagah implicit differentiation se kyun obtain karte hain?
Hum formula derive karte hain: set karke aur implicitly differentiate karne se woh general machine milti hai jo har inverse-function derivative produce karta hai — result yaad karna skip kar deta hai ye samajhna ki par woh kyun hai.
Related rates mein ki jagah kyun use karte hain?
Related Rates mein dono aur time ke functions hain, toh hum ke w.r.t. differentiate karte hain; phir har variable toll deta hai ( ya ) — same chain-rule logic, alag independent variable.
Tangent slope milte hi normal line ka slope immediately kyun mil jaata hai?
Normal tangent ke perpendicular hoti hai, toh uska slope hai (dekho Tangent and Normal Lines); implicit differentiation supply karta hai chahe nahi likhi ja sake.
Edge cases
Jab tangent vertical ho, kya report karta hai?
Woh blow up ho jaata hai (denominator ), jo correct signal hai ki slope undefined/vertical hai, koi mistake nahi — geometry aur algebra agree karte hain (upar vertical-tangent figure dekho).
Agar par bhi ho (agar aisa point curve par hota) toh ka kya hoga?
milega, ek indeterminate form jo ek singular point flag karta hai (jaise folium of Descartes ka origin par crossing), jahan ek se zyaada tangents exist kar sakti hain aur simple formula fail ho jaata hai.
ke liye, log lene se pehle kyun assume karna padta hai?
aur sirf ke liye real-valued hain (usual sense mein); non-positive base ka undefined hai, toh logarithmic method us domain tak restricted hai.
Circle par, abhi bhi par behave kyun karta hai?
par (points ) tangent vertical hai aur locally ka function nahi hai, toh aur dono wahan undefined hain — denominator mein ise explicit kar deta hai.
Agar equation ho, toh implicit differentiation kya deta hai?
Steps formally tak chal jaate hain, lekin equation ke koi real solutions nahi hain, toh koi real curve nahi aur hence koi real tangent nahi — derivative trust karne se pehle hamesha check karo ki locus nonempty hai.
Agar kisi point par dono aur ho, toh se slope kya hoga?
Slope exactly hoga — horizontal tangent — jo perfectly valid hai; sirf zero denominator () trouble karta hai, zero numerator nahi.