4.1.20 · D3 · Maths › Calculus I — Limits & Derivatives › Derivatives of ln x and logₐ(x)
Intuition Yeh page kya hai
Parent note ne tumhe do master formulas diye. Yeh page un formulas par har tarah ka problem throw karta hai — alag bases, nested functions, negative inputs, products, variable exponents, ek real-world rate, aur ek exam trap. Agar neeche ke matrix mein koi cell exist karti hai, toh use yahan fully worked out dekhoge.
Hum sirf wahi tools use karte hain jo already proven hain:
d x d ln x = x 1 , d x d ln u = u u ′ , d x d log a x = x l n a 1 .
Yahan u ka matlab hai "log ke andar chhupa hua koi function of x ," aur u ′ uska derivative hai. Baaki sab careful bookkeeping hai.
Kuch bhi work karne se pehle, har case-class list karte hain jo is topic se aa sakti hai. Har row ek "cell" hai. Neeche ke worked examples us cell se tagged hain jise woh cover karte hain, taaki milke poora grid fill ho jaye.
#
Cell (case class)
Kya alag hai isme
Example
C1
Plain ln of a polynomial
pure chain rule u ′ / u
(a)
C2
Non-e base log a
extra ln a 1 factor
(b)
C3
Pehle simplify karo (log laws)
chain rule ki zaroorat hi nahi
(c)
C4
Negative / absolute-value input
domain, ln ∣ x ∣
(d)
C5
Product/quotient inside
log laws use karke sum ban jaata hai
(e)
C6
Variable exponent mein
logarithmic differentiation
(f)
C7
Real-world rate (word problem)
units, interpretation
(g)
C8
Exam twist / degenerate
limiting value, hidden constant
(h)
Hum aath examples se aathon cells cover karenge.
Har example ke peeche ek hi fact hai — ln x ki shape aur uska slope 1/ x . Figure dekho: height badhti hai lekin dheere dheere, aur slope triangles right jaane par flatten hote jaate hain.
Intuition Yeh shape examples ke liye kyun matter karti hai
Neeche har worked answer "inside ke upar kuch" par khatam hoga. Jab inside bada hoga, slope chhota hoga — exactly wahi flattening jo figure mein dikh rahi hai. Yeh picture apne dimaag mein rakhna sanity check ke liye: sirf isliye log derivative negative nahi hoti kyunki x bada hai; yeh zero ki taraf shrink karti hai.
f ( x ) = ln ( x 2 + 4 ) differentiate karo
Forecast: answer padhne se pehle guess karo. Yeh "inside ka derivative over the inside" hona chahiye. Inside ka derivative kya hai?
Inside identify karo: u = x 2 + 4 .
Yeh step kyun? d x d ln u = u u ′ tabhi kaam karta hai jab u clearly naam ho.
Inside differentiate karo: u ′ = 2 x .
Yeh step kyun? x 2 par power rule 2 x deta hai; constant 4 ka contribution 0 hai.
Assemble karo: f ′ ( x ) = u u ′ = x 2 + 4 2 x .
Yeh step kyun? Yeh Chain Rule hai jo ln ke liye specialise hua hai.
Verify: inside x 2 + 4 hamesha ≥ 4 > 0 hai, isliye ln sab real x ke liye defined hai — domain ki koi chinta nahi. x = 0 par slope hai 4 0 = 0 : sahi hai, kyunki x 2 + 4 wahan minimum hai (flat bottom), toh uska log bhi flat hai. ✓
g ( x ) = log 10 ( 7 x ) differentiate karo
Forecast: 7 ek constant hai jo x se multiply ho raha hai. Kya yeh answer mein bachega, ya cancel ho jaayega?
Change of base: g ( x ) = ln 10 ln ( 7 x ) .
Yeh step kyun? Hum sirf ln ka clean rule prove kar chuke hain; pehle convert karo (dekho Logarithm Laws ).
Top ko log law se split karo: ln ( 7 x ) = ln 7 + ln x , toh g ( x ) = ln 10 ln 7 + ln x .
Yeh step kyun? ln 7 ek pure constant hai — uska derivative 0 hai, toh 7 gayab ho jaayega.
Differentiate karo: g ′ ( x ) = ln 10 1 ⋅ x 1 = x ln 10 1 .
Yeh step kyun? l n 10 1 ek constant multiplier hai; sirf ln x ka slope hai.
Verify: master formula seedha use karke, d x d log 10 u = u l n 10 u ′ = 7 x l n 10 7 = x l n 10 1 . Wahi answer — 7 cancel ho gaya, exactly wahi constant-inside phenomenon. ✓
h ( x ) = ln x + 1 x 3 differentiate karo
Forecast: yeh ek quotient-plus-chain nightmare lagta hai. Log laws ise do-term sum bana dete hain. Guess karo answer mein kitne terms honge.
Log laws se expand karo: h ( x ) = ln x 3 − ln ( x + 1 ) 1/2 = 3 ln x − 2 1 ln ( x + 1 ) .
Yeh step kyun? ln B A = ln A − ln B aur ln A p = p ln A ek mushkil log ko do aasaan logon mein badal dete hain (Logarithm Laws ).
Term by term differentiate karo:
h ′ ( x ) = 3 ⋅ x 1 − 2 1 ⋅ x + 1 1 .
Yeh step kyun? Ab har term plain ln hai; doosra d x d ln ( x + 1 ) = x + 1 1 use karta hai.
Tidy karo: h ′ ( x ) = x 3 − 2 ( x + 1 ) 1 .
Yeh step kyun? Sirf cosmetic — sum ke roop mein chhodo, yeh already clean hai.
Verify: original ka domain x > 0 hai (chahiye x 3 > 0 aur x + 1 > 0 ). x = 1 par: h ′ ( 1 ) = 3 − 4 1 = 4 11 = 2.75 . Reasonable aur positive — function wahan increasing hai. ✓
p ( x ) = ln ∣ x ∣ differentiate karo, aur p ′ ( − 2 ) evaluate karo
Forecast: negative number ka ln undefined hai — lekin ln ∣ x ∣ x < 0 ke liye theek hai. Kya tumhare khayaal mein slope formula left side par sign flip karta hai?
x > 0 ke liye: ∣ x ∣ = x , toh p ( x ) = ln x aur p ′ ( x ) = x 1 .
Yeh step kyun? Positive side par koi absolute value ki chinta nahi.
x < 0 ke liye: ∣ x ∣ = − x , toh p ( x ) = ln ( − x ) . Chain rule u = − x , u ′ = − 1 ke saath:
p ′ ( x ) = u u ′ = − x − 1 = x 1 .
Yeh step kyun? Do minus signs cancel ho jaate hain — slope dono sides par 1/ x hai.
Combine karo: p ′ ( x ) = x 1 sabhi x = 0 ke liye.
Yeh step kyun? Ek tidy rule poora domain cover karta hai minus forbidden point x = 0 .
Verify: p ′ ( − 2 ) = − 2 1 = − 0.5 . Neeche figure mein mirror-image branch dikhti hai; left side par curve x ke 0 ki taraf badhne par girta hai, toh negative slope sahi hai. ✓
ln ∣ x ∣ ka x = − 2 par koi derivative nahi kyunki logs ko positives chahiye."
Kyun sahi lagta hai: tumhe bataya gaya tha ki ln ko x > 0 chahiye. Sach yeh hai: argument ∣ − 2 ∣ = 2 positive hai ; absolute value domain fix kar deta hai. Sirf x = 0 exclude hai. Fix: derivative x 1 har x = 0 ke liye valid hai.
q ( x ) = ln ( x 2 e 3 x ) differentiate karo
Forecast: tum product ko chain-rule kar sakte ho, ya log law se split kar sakte ho. Kaun mein kam steps hain?
Split karo: q ( x ) = ln x 2 + ln e 3 x = 2 ln x + 3 x .
Yeh step kyun? ln ( A B ) = ln A + ln B , aur ln e 3 x = 3 x kyunki ln e ko undo karta hai (inverse of exp ).
Differentiate karo: q ′ ( x ) = 2 ⋅ x 1 + 3 = x 2 + 3.
Yeh step kyun? Ab dono terms elementary hain; chain rule ki bilkul zaroorat nahi.
Verify (messy route se): u = x 2 e 3 x ke saath, u ′ = 2 x e 3 x + x 2 ⋅ 3 e 3 x = e 3 x ( 2 x + 3 x 2 ) . Phir u u ′ = x 2 e 3 x e 3 x ( 2 x + 3 x 2 ) = x 2 2 x + 3 x 2 = x 2 + 3 . Bilkul same — log laws ne algebra bachaa liya. ✓
x > 0 ke liye y = ( 2 x ) x differentiate karo
Forecast: exponent variable hai, toh na power rule na a x rule akele kaam karta hai. Kaun sa tool exponent ko neeche kheenchta hai? Logs. Dekho Logarithmic Differentiation .
Dono sides ka ln lo: ln y = x ln ( 2 x ) .
Yeh step kyun? ln A p = p ln A variable exponent x ko ek aisi product mein laata hai jise hum differentiate kar sakte hain.
Right side simplify karo: ln ( 2 x ) = ln 2 + ln x , toh ln y = x ln 2 + x ln x .
Yeh step kyun? Pehle split karna product rule ko aasaan banata hai.
Dono sides differentiate karo (left par Implicit Differentiation ):
y y ′ = ln 2 + ( ln x + x ⋅ x 1 ) = ln 2 + ln x + 1.
Yeh step kyun? Left side: d x d ln y = y y ′ (chain rule). Right: x ln x par product rule.
y ′ ke liye solve karo: y ′ = ( 2 x ) x ( ln 2 + ln x + 1 ) .
Yeh step kyun? y = ( 2 x ) x se multiply karo wapas.
Verify: note karo ln 2 + ln x = ln ( 2 x ) , toh y ′ = ( 2 x ) x ( ln ( 2 x ) + 1 ) — same shape jaise parent ka x x ( ln x + 1 ) , log ke andar x → 2 x ke saath. x = 1 par: y = 2 1 = 2 aur y ′ = 2 ( ln 2 + 0 + 1 ) = 2 ( ln 2 + 1 ) ≈ 3.386 . ✓
Worked example Ek quiet zone ki loudness decibels mein
L ( I ) = 10 log 10 ( I 0 I ) hai, jahan I sound intensity hai aur I 0 ek fixed reference hai. L ka I ke saath rate of change kitna hai? I = 100 I 0 par evaluate karo.
Forecast: zyada intensity matlab zyada loudness — lekin log ka matlab hai har extra unit of I kam add karta hai. Guess karo: kya d I d L I badhne par grow karega ya shrink karega?
Rewrite karo: L = 10 ( log 10 I − log 10 I 0 ) ; doosra term constant hai.
Yeh step kyun? log 10 I 0 ka derivative zero hai — sirf log 10 I vary karta hai.
Master rule d I d log 10 I = I l n 10 1 use karke differentiate karo:
d I d L = 10 ⋅ I l n 10 1 = I l n 10 10 .
Yeh step kyun? Base-10 log l n 10 1 factor laata hai (Cell C2 ka lesson).
I = 100 I 0 par evaluate karo: d I d L = 100 I 0 ln 10 10 = 10 I 0 ln 10 1 .
Yeh step kyun? Value plug karo aur I 0 ko symbolic rakhho (yeh intensity ke units ke saath ek fixed constant hai).
Verify: units hain decibels per unit intensity , aur answer 1/ I ki tarah shrink karta hai — exactly figure s01 se wahi flattening. Louder sounds ko same decibel gain ke liye intensity ka bada jump chahiye, isliye decibels logarithmic hain. Numerically 100 l n 10 10 ≈ 0.04343 dB per unit (I 0 = 1 leke). ✓
d x d log a x find karo aur batao kya hota hai jab base a → 1 + .
Forecast: formula hai x l n a 1 . Jab a 1 ki taraf slide karta hai toh ln a kya karta hai? Yahi trap hai.
Master formula: d x d log a x = x ln a 1 .
Yeh step kyun? Seedha change of base se; fixed a ke liye ln a ek constant hai.
Degenerate limit: jab a → 1 + , ln a → 0 + , toh x ln a 1 → + ∞ .
Yeh step kyun? 0 ki taraf shrink hoti cheez se divide karne par slope blow up ho jaata hai.
Interpret karo: log 1 x undefined hai — isliye parent note demand karta hai a = 1 . Derivative ka diverge karna forbidden base ko signal karta hai.
Yeh step kyun? Calculus boundary par warn karta hai: infinite slope matlab function khud collapse ho gaya.
Verify: doosra special base a = e sanity check karo: ln e = 1 deta hai x ⋅ 1 1 = x 1 , plain ln recover ho gaya (parent §3). Aur a = 2 par x = 1 par 1 ⋅ l n 2 1 ≈ 1.4427 milta hai. Dono finite aur correct; sirf a = 1 misbehave karta hai. ✓
Recall Har problem kaun sa cell hit karta hai? (right side cover karo)
d x d ln ( x 2 + 4 ) ::: C1 — plain chain rule, answer x 2 + 4 2 x .
d x d log 10 ( 7 x ) ::: C2 — extra l n 10 1 , answer x l n 10 1 .
d x d ln x + 1 x 3 ::: C3 — pehle split karo, answer x 3 − 2 ( x + 1 ) 1 .
d x d ln ∣ x ∣ ::: C4 — x 1 sabhi x = 0 ke liye.
d x d ln ( x 2 e 3 x ) ::: C5 — x 2 + 3 .
d x d ( 2 x ) x ::: C6 — ( 2 x ) x ( ln ( 2 x ) + 1 ) .
log a x a → 1 par kyun break karta hai? ::: C8 — ln a → 0 , slope → ∞ , base 1 forbidden.
Mnemonic One-line strategy picker
"Split, name, blow-up." Split karo log laws se jab product/quotient/power ho (C3, C5); inside ko u name karo raw chain rule ke liye (C1); boundary par blow-up / hidden constants dekho (C2, C8).
Chain Rule — C1, C4 ka engine.
Logarithm Laws — C3, C5 ko sums mein badalta hai.
Logarithmic Differentiation — C6 ka eklauta raasta.
Implicit Differentiation — C6 mein d x d ln y ke andar use hota hai.
Derivative of e^x and a^x — C5 mein ln e 3 x simplify karne wala inverse fact.
Standard Limit (1+t)^{1/t} → e — woh foundation jis par parent ka 1/ x tika hai.
Parent topic — woh master formulas jo yeh page exercise karta hai.