HOW — scratch se derive karo:f′(x)=limh→0h(x+h)n−xn.
Numerator expand karo:
(x+h)n−xn=xn+nxn−1h+(2n)xn−2h2+⋯+hn−xn.h se divide karo:
h(x+h)n−xn=nxn−1+har term mein h hai(2n)xn−2h+⋯+hn−1.h→0 lo: brace mein har term mein h hai, toh woh mar jaata hai.
f′(x)=nxn−1.
HOW — derive karo:
Maano y=xp/q⇒yq=xp (dono integer exponents). Dono sides ko
x ke w.r.t. differentiate karo (left side pe chain rule use karo — jo khud Stage 1 ka consequence hai):
qyq−1dxdy=pxp−1.Ye step kyun? Left side: dxdyq=qyq−1dxdy. Solve karo:
dxdy=qp⋅yq−1xp−1.y=xp/q substitute karo, toh yq−1=xp(q−1)/q=xp−p/q:
dxdy=qpxp−1−(p−p/q)=qpxp/q−1.n=p/q ke saath: dxdy=nxn−1. ✓
Positive-integer proof mein kaun sa theorem kaam aata hai?
Binomial theorem jo (x+h)n expand karta hai.
(x+h)n−xn expand karke h se divide karne ke baad, h→0 pe kaun sa term bachta hai?
nxn−1 wala term (baaki sab mein h ka factor hota hai).
Binomial proof n=1/2 ya n=−3 ke liye kyun kaam nahi karta?
Un exponents se ek infinite series milti hai, na ki finite cancellable expansion.
Negative integers ke liye rule prove karne ki trick?
x−m=1/xm likho, common denominator lo, positive-integer result reuse karo.
Rational p/q ke liye rule prove karne ki trick?
y=xp/q set karo, power q se raise karo taaki yq=xp mile, phir implicitly differentiate karo.
yq ko x ke w.r.t. differentiate karne se kya milta hai?
qyq−1dxdy (chain rule).
dxdx?
2x1.
Kya dxd2x=x2x−1 hai?
Nahi — ye galat rule hai; dxd2x=2xln2.
dxdx−2?
−2x−3.
Recall Feynman: 12-saal ke bachche ko samjhao
Socho ek tower hai blocks ka jahan har level x times wide hai, n levels oonchi — woh hai
xn. Agar tum x ko thoda sa bada karo, tower kitni tezi se badhega? Answer hai: tumhe
n copies milenge ek-level-chote towers (xn−1) ke, kyunki n levels mein se har ek
"feel" karta hai us stretch ko. Isliye tum n ko aage slide karte ho aur height ek se ghata dete ho. Roots ke liye
(jaise x) hum ek flip-game khelate hain: isko square karo taaki root khatam ho, easy rule use karo, phir
flip back karo.