Hum strong induction ko aise hi accept nahi karte — hum ise ordinary induction se derive karte hain. Yahi "derivation-from-scratch" ka poora point hai.
Toh strong induction koi naya axiom nahi hai — yeh ordinary induction hai jo "cumulative" statement Q pe apply hoti hai.
What extra information does strong induction assume compared to ordinary induction?
Yeh P(k)saarek ke liye assume karta hai jahan n0≤k<n, sirf P(n−1) nahi.
Why can strong induction be derived from ordinary induction?
Ordinary induction ko Q(n) = "P(k) saare k≤n ke liye true" pe apply karo; iska single-step hypothesis strong hypothesis ke barabar hota hai.
How many base cases do you need if the inductive step uses P(n−2)?
Kam se kam do, taaki step kabhi kisi undefined/unproven predecessor ko reference na kare.
In the prime-factorisation proof, why is ordinary induction insufficient?
Composite n=ab mein a,b<n hain lekin zaruri nahi =n−1; poori history chahiye, immediate predecessor nahi.
Is the strong induction hypothesis allowed to include k=n?
Nahi — strictly k<n; P(n) wahi hai jo tumhe prove karna hai.
Are strong and ordinary induction logically equivalent?
Haan; ek dusre ko imply karta hai.
Recall Feynman: 12-year-old ko explain karo
Socho ek staircase chadh rahe ho. Normal induction: ek step tak pahunchne ke liye bas usi ke theek neeche wale step pe khade rehna hai. Lekin kuch steps bade hote hain — step 10 tak pahunchne ke liye shayad tumhe steps 6 aur 8 se push off karna pade. Strong induction kehta hai: "Mujhe ek saath apne neeche ke saare steps pe khade hone ka haq hai, phir upar jaata hoon." Jab tak neeche ke kuch steps shuruaat mein solid hain, tum infinite staircase ki choti tak pahunch sakte ho.